Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Allison Bailey v Stonewall - Employment Tribunal hearing Thread 17

1000 replies

ickky · 03/06/2022 15:32

The Tribunal started on 25th April, witness testimony concluded on the 26th May. Closing arguments for council will be on the 20th June. I don't know if the existing links and pins will work. I will email nearer the time to check.

If you would like to view online you need to send a request for access.
Send an email to

[email protected]

The subject heading of the email request should read

“MEDIA OR PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST – Case number 2202172/2020 - Ms A Bailey – 20th June 2022.

Then ask for the pin for the online access.

You will be contacted with instructions on how to observe the hearing.

When joining the live tribunal please choose a non inflammatory/offensive name, everyone can see it in the chat - This is a court room, please behave accordingly.

The court chat function is there for official court purposes, not for observers, please don't use it unless you have a technical issue.

On the first page underneath where you put your screen name, select the video and mic that are not crossed out (top option), this is the courts vid and mic.
On the next page select NONE on the drop down windows for vid and mic, these are your own video and mic.

You must be muted so as to not disturb the hearing.

There is also live tweeting from

twitter.com/tribunaltweets

Abbreviations:

AB: Allison Bailey, claimant
BC: Ben Cooper QC, barrister for AB
SW = Stonewall Equality Limited (respondent 1)
IO = Ijeoma Omambala QC, senior counsel - barrister for SW
RW = Robin White junior counsel to SW - assisting IO
GC = Garden Court Chambers Limited (respondent 2) (GCC would be a better abbreviation)
AH = Andrew Hochhauser QC, senior counsel - barrister for GC
JR = Jane Russell junior counsel to GC - assisting AH
RM= Rajiv Menon QC & SH = Stephanie Harrison QC (jointly respondent 3 along with all members of GC except AB)
EJ = Employment Judge Goodman hearing the case
Panel = any one of the three panel members (EJ and two lay members)

Thread 1 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4529887-Allison-Bailey-v-Stonewall-Employment-Tribunal-hearing?

Thread 2 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4542466-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-2

Thread 3 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4545725-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-3

Thread 4 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4546945-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-4

Thread 5 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4548160-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-5

Thread 6 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4550451-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-6

Thread 7 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4551757-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-7

Thread 8 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4552521-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-8

Thread 9 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553181-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-9

Thread 10 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553754-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-10

Thread 11 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555145-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-11

Thread 12 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555687-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-12

Thread 13 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556235-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-13

Thread 14 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556407-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-14

Thread 15 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556803-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-15

Thread 16 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4557036-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-16

Allison Bailey - claimant (4-9, 11-13 May)

Witnesses for the claimant:

Dr Nicola Williams - Fair Play for Women (29 April)
Dr Judith Green - A Woman's Place (29 April)
Kate Barker - LGB Alliance (3 May)
Lisa-Marie Taylor - FiLiA (4 May)

Witnesses for the respondents:

Stephen Lue - barrister for GCC (3-4 May)
Zainab Al-Farabi - ex Stonewall (10 May)
Kirrin Medcalf - head of trans inclusion Stonewall (10 May)
Leslie Thomas - barrister at GCC (13 May)
Sanjay Sood Smith - Stonewall (16 May)
Shaan Knan - LGBT consortium - on STAG (16 May)
Rajiv Menon - joint head of chambers (16-17 May)
Maya Sikand - barrister at GCC (17-18 May)
Mia Hakl-Law - HR senior for GCC (18 May)
Judy Khan - barrister at GCC (19-20 May)
Charlie Tennent - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Luke Harvey - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Louise Hooper - Barrister at GCC (20 May)
David Renton - barrister at GCC (20 May, 25 May)
Marc Willers - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Stephen Clark - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Liz Davies - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Cathryn McGahey - Bar Council Ethics Committee's VC (24 May)
Tom Wainwright - Barrister at GCC (24 May)
Colin Cook - Head clerk at GCC (24 May)
David de Menezes - GCC, Head of Marketing (25 May)
Kathryn Cronin - barrister at GCC (25 May)
Michelle Brewer - barrister at GCC at time, now left and a judge (26 May)
Stephanie Harrison - joint head of chambers (26 May)

To Come

Closing arguments for AB, GCC, and SW (20 June)

OP posts:
WearyLady · 20/06/2022 14:22

Is there just one day for closing submissions? It's now 14.20. When will BC get his chance? He's not going to have much time.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 14:22

Oh AH is full of righteous indignation

Pluvia · 20/06/2022 14:23

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:17

Does anyone remember the bin? I think we would have remembered it, even against the general farce of some of the witness testimony.

First mention I've heard of the bin/ car interface too.

Not sure it's wise of AH to go do the old 'look at her demeanour/ she's a judge, are you seriously suggesting that she might have lied under oath' line. I don't think MB came over at all well.

CriticalCondition · 20/06/2022 14:23

SK in a subsequent message to MB about their conversation said something along the lines of 'hope the bump in the car wasn't serious'. That's the only time I think it was mentioned.

Imnotavetbut · 20/06/2022 14:24

Yes, no surprises that SK and KM have been thrown under a bus. By both Stonewall and GCC.

I've got to go out soon. Bloody IO's bumbling and AH's whining means I'm going to miss Ben. I thought I might at least get to see a bit of him but it's looking unlikely.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 14:24

My screen has gone odd as has AHs

GrimDamnFanjo · 20/06/2022 14:25

I occasionally get a strange view of tiling empty screens....

GodisaBC · 20/06/2022 14:26

I had no problem joining this morning but had to try again and again this afternoon.
Last minute 3pm meeting cancelled - yee hah!

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:29

Pluvia - before I got distracted by the bin I was thinking along the same lines. We should accept that because it wasn't specifically put to MB that she might be lying under oath she definitely wasn't.

Why would AH make that point?

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 14:29

BC asking for a time check

Queenoftheashes · 20/06/2022 14:29

Zzzz

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:30

AH 'Can I have five mins?'

EJG (four minute pause) 'Well...'

Roseglen84 · 20/06/2022 14:30

Hahaha, EJ was so pissed when he asked for 5 mins more ...

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 14:30

AH asks for 5 more minutes. Deathly silence.

One more game Mummy? Just one more?

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 14:30

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:29

Pluvia - before I got distracted by the bin I was thinking along the same lines. We should accept that because it wasn't specifically put to MB that she might be lying under oath she definitely wasn't.

Why would AH make that point?

Wouldn't a judge (as MB is) k with not to lie?

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 14:31

Know not to lie

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:31

Oh good god. Nelson Mandela and the SA Rugby team again.

dunBel · 20/06/2022 14:31

"Ms McGahey was an IMPRESSIVE witness" - clearly BC has come to a different conclusion in his submission.

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 14:31

Using the Mandela analogy is not indicative of taking a side. She's decent, impartial and honest witness.

Furious backtracking.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 14:31

Attempting to come back from the racism comparison

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 14:31

I get the impression that AB/BC have suggested that MB was not truthful.

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 14:31

Everyone is stressed now about the timings.

tigertactics · 20/06/2022 14:32

Not sure it's Hocky's job to tell EJ who was an impressive witness. Plus he's talking about CM who told us that lesbians wanting biological women only was comparable to apartheid. Other adjectives occur...

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 14:32

Absolutely Chrysanthemum5, as would we all, having been sworn in. So why would AH feel he needs to say it in his closing submission (or at all?)

ickky · 20/06/2022 14:32

2 minutes AH, hurry up.

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.