Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Allison Bailey v Stonewall - Employment Tribunal hearing Thread 17

1000 replies

ickky · 03/06/2022 15:32

The Tribunal started on 25th April, witness testimony concluded on the 26th May. Closing arguments for council will be on the 20th June. I don't know if the existing links and pins will work. I will email nearer the time to check.

If you would like to view online you need to send a request for access.
Send an email to

[email protected]

The subject heading of the email request should read

“MEDIA OR PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST – Case number 2202172/2020 - Ms A Bailey – 20th June 2022.

Then ask for the pin for the online access.

You will be contacted with instructions on how to observe the hearing.

When joining the live tribunal please choose a non inflammatory/offensive name, everyone can see it in the chat - This is a court room, please behave accordingly.

The court chat function is there for official court purposes, not for observers, please don't use it unless you have a technical issue.

On the first page underneath where you put your screen name, select the video and mic that are not crossed out (top option), this is the courts vid and mic.
On the next page select NONE on the drop down windows for vid and mic, these are your own video and mic.

You must be muted so as to not disturb the hearing.

There is also live tweeting from

twitter.com/tribunaltweets

Abbreviations:

AB: Allison Bailey, claimant
BC: Ben Cooper QC, barrister for AB
SW = Stonewall Equality Limited (respondent 1)
IO = Ijeoma Omambala QC, senior counsel - barrister for SW
RW = Robin White junior counsel to SW - assisting IO
GC = Garden Court Chambers Limited (respondent 2) (GCC would be a better abbreviation)
AH = Andrew Hochhauser QC, senior counsel - barrister for GC
JR = Jane Russell junior counsel to GC - assisting AH
RM= Rajiv Menon QC & SH = Stephanie Harrison QC (jointly respondent 3 along with all members of GC except AB)
EJ = Employment Judge Goodman hearing the case
Panel = any one of the three panel members (EJ and two lay members)

Thread 1 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4529887-Allison-Bailey-v-Stonewall-Employment-Tribunal-hearing?

Thread 2 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4542466-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-2

Thread 3 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4545725-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-3

Thread 4 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4546945-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-4

Thread 5 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4548160-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-5

Thread 6 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4550451-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-6

Thread 7 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4551757-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-7

Thread 8 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4552521-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-8

Thread 9 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553181-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-9

Thread 10 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553754-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-10

Thread 11 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555145-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-11

Thread 12 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555687-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-12

Thread 13 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556235-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-13

Thread 14 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556407-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-14

Thread 15 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556803-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-15

Thread 16 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4557036-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-16

Allison Bailey - claimant (4-9, 11-13 May)

Witnesses for the claimant:

Dr Nicola Williams - Fair Play for Women (29 April)
Dr Judith Green - A Woman's Place (29 April)
Kate Barker - LGB Alliance (3 May)
Lisa-Marie Taylor - FiLiA (4 May)

Witnesses for the respondents:

Stephen Lue - barrister for GCC (3-4 May)
Zainab Al-Farabi - ex Stonewall (10 May)
Kirrin Medcalf - head of trans inclusion Stonewall (10 May)
Leslie Thomas - barrister at GCC (13 May)
Sanjay Sood Smith - Stonewall (16 May)
Shaan Knan - LGBT consortium - on STAG (16 May)
Rajiv Menon - joint head of chambers (16-17 May)
Maya Sikand - barrister at GCC (17-18 May)
Mia Hakl-Law - HR senior for GCC (18 May)
Judy Khan - barrister at GCC (19-20 May)
Charlie Tennent - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Luke Harvey - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Louise Hooper - Barrister at GCC (20 May)
David Renton - barrister at GCC (20 May, 25 May)
Marc Willers - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Stephen Clark - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Liz Davies - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Cathryn McGahey - Bar Council Ethics Committee's VC (24 May)
Tom Wainwright - Barrister at GCC (24 May)
Colin Cook - Head clerk at GCC (24 May)
David de Menezes - GCC, Head of Marketing (25 May)
Kathryn Cronin - barrister at GCC (25 May)
Michelle Brewer - barrister at GCC at time, now left and a judge (26 May)
Stephanie Harrison - joint head of chambers (26 May)

To Come

Closing arguments for AB, GCC, and SW (20 June)

OP posts:
oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 11:20

GCC were not SW's agents

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:22

Remind me who STAG are? I thought stonewall trans advisory group?

chilling19 · 20/06/2022 11:23

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:22

Remind me who STAG are? I thought stonewall trans advisory group?

Yes

Mmmnotsure · 20/06/2022 11:23

Watching IO (and thinking back to the GCC witnesses) I hope that anyone out there thinking that they might like to be a barrister but probably wouldn't be good enough to join such a highly regarded, elite profession...

Ameanstreakamilewide · 20/06/2022 11:23

I just laughed at May Duppname.

chilling19 · 20/06/2022 11:24

I think she is arguing that whatever the STAG and the support person with the mum and dog were not acting on SW's behalf.

chilling19 · 20/06/2022 11:25

It must be difficult for her - she is trying to discredit another working class black barrister.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:25

Thanks @chilling19 so the stonewall advisory group and its members were not related to stonewall - good to know stonewall will throw its own people under the bus

nauticant · 20/06/2022 11:27

IO again separating Medcalf out from the main points of her arguments about SW not having instructed GCC. That'll be "rogue actor" Medcalf.

chilling19 · 20/06/2022 11:28

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:25

Thanks @chilling19 so the stonewall advisory group and its members were not related to stonewall - good to know stonewall will throw its own people under the bus

I think that is what she was arguing, but I could be wrong.

IDidntKnowItWasAParty · 20/06/2022 11:28

How could the Stonewall Trans Advisory Group NOT be working on behalf of Stonewall?!

ifIwerenotanandroid · 20/06/2022 11:29

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 11:15

Invoking my favourite Mary Poppins song. This is fab. If we can get the rights we can include this bit as a musical number in the film.

Fidelity fiduciary bank.

Earlier in the tribunal, DH & I were discussing companies & the Stonewall scheme, & he came up with 'tickety-box tickety-boo' which I feel is inspired & could form the basis of a number in 'Tribunal - the Musical'.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:29

IDidntKnowItWasAParty · 20/06/2022 11:28

How could the Stonewall Trans Advisory Group NOT be working on behalf of Stonewall?!

I think at the original evidence they put forward the idea that it was a voluntary committee so not officially stonewall

IloveHolby · 20/06/2022 11:30

Oh um this um is so um tedious uh....I've ah lost ah all sense of um what ah she ah is ah going ah on ah about! Help!

nauticant · 20/06/2022 11:30

Ahh, now IO is dealing separately with Medcalf. According to IO it simply expresses concern about AB's actions, ie targeting a Stonewall employee for abuse on a public platform.

Mmmnotsure · 20/06/2022 11:31

I really hope for IO's sake that she doesn't take up playing poker.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:31

I am impressed so much by EJG keeping track of all this - however much she's paid it it's not enough

nauticant · 20/06/2022 11:31

"it" in my post above refers to Medcalf's email.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:31

FFS IO stonewall are your client - you meant GCC

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 11:32

Referring now to KM's email "not an instruction"
So asking GCC "to do the right thing" is just asking them to stand with the trans community.
KM doesn't ask them to do anything in particular.

Boiledbeetle · 20/06/2022 11:32

She's talking rubbish now about km letter!

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 11:32

That was a definite eye roll from EJG.

I've been sorting washing while IO drones on. It does help to follow when having something practical to do simultaneously.

Chrysanthemum5 · 20/06/2022 11:33

And while we find this annoying - how hard must this be for Allison to listen to?

Mmmnotsure · 20/06/2022 11:33

IO He asks Stonewall to do the right thing
oh hang on
He asks GCC to...

If I can turn to
pause
sorry
if I can...
papers rustle

Poor EJ on camera throughout all this

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 11:34

IloveHolby · 20/06/2022 11:30

Oh um this um is so um tedious uh....I've ah lost ah all sense of um what ah she ah is ah going ah on ah about! Help!

I counted 7 "the"s in a row at one point 😬

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread