Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Allison Bailey v Stonewall - Employment Tribunal hearing Thread 17

1000 replies

ickky · 03/06/2022 15:32

The Tribunal started on 25th April, witness testimony concluded on the 26th May. Closing arguments for council will be on the 20th June. I don't know if the existing links and pins will work. I will email nearer the time to check.

If you would like to view online you need to send a request for access.
Send an email to

[email protected]

The subject heading of the email request should read

“MEDIA OR PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST – Case number 2202172/2020 - Ms A Bailey – 20th June 2022.

Then ask for the pin for the online access.

You will be contacted with instructions on how to observe the hearing.

When joining the live tribunal please choose a non inflammatory/offensive name, everyone can see it in the chat - This is a court room, please behave accordingly.

The court chat function is there for official court purposes, not for observers, please don't use it unless you have a technical issue.

On the first page underneath where you put your screen name, select the video and mic that are not crossed out (top option), this is the courts vid and mic.
On the next page select NONE on the drop down windows for vid and mic, these are your own video and mic.

You must be muted so as to not disturb the hearing.

There is also live tweeting from

twitter.com/tribunaltweets

Abbreviations:

AB: Allison Bailey, claimant
BC: Ben Cooper QC, barrister for AB
SW = Stonewall Equality Limited (respondent 1)
IO = Ijeoma Omambala QC, senior counsel - barrister for SW
RW = Robin White junior counsel to SW - assisting IO
GC = Garden Court Chambers Limited (respondent 2) (GCC would be a better abbreviation)
AH = Andrew Hochhauser QC, senior counsel - barrister for GC
JR = Jane Russell junior counsel to GC - assisting AH
RM= Rajiv Menon QC & SH = Stephanie Harrison QC (jointly respondent 3 along with all members of GC except AB)
EJ = Employment Judge Goodman hearing the case
Panel = any one of the three panel members (EJ and two lay members)

Thread 1 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4529887-Allison-Bailey-v-Stonewall-Employment-Tribunal-hearing?

Thread 2 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4542466-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-2

Thread 3 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4545725-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-3

Thread 4 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4546945-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-4

Thread 5 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4548160-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-5

Thread 6 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4550451-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-6

Thread 7 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4551757-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-7

Thread 8 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4552521-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-8

Thread 9 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553181-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-9

Thread 10 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4553754-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-10

Thread 11 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555145-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-11

Thread 12 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4555687-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-12

Thread 13 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556235-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-13

Thread 14 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556407-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-14

Thread 15 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4556803-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-15

Thread 16 www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4557036-allison-bailey-v-stonewall-employment-tribunal-hearing-thread-16

Allison Bailey - claimant (4-9, 11-13 May)

Witnesses for the claimant:

Dr Nicola Williams - Fair Play for Women (29 April)
Dr Judith Green - A Woman's Place (29 April)
Kate Barker - LGB Alliance (3 May)
Lisa-Marie Taylor - FiLiA (4 May)

Witnesses for the respondents:

Stephen Lue - barrister for GCC (3-4 May)
Zainab Al-Farabi - ex Stonewall (10 May)
Kirrin Medcalf - head of trans inclusion Stonewall (10 May)
Leslie Thomas - barrister at GCC (13 May)
Sanjay Sood Smith - Stonewall (16 May)
Shaan Knan - LGBT consortium - on STAG (16 May)
Rajiv Menon - joint head of chambers (16-17 May)
Maya Sikand - barrister at GCC (17-18 May)
Mia Hakl-Law - HR senior for GCC (18 May)
Judy Khan - barrister at GCC (19-20 May)
Charlie Tennent - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Luke Harvey - clerk at GCC (20 May)
Louise Hooper - Barrister at GCC (20 May)
David Renton - barrister at GCC (20 May, 25 May)
Marc Willers - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Stephen Clark - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Liz Davies - Barrister at GCC (23 May)
Cathryn McGahey - Bar Council Ethics Committee's VC (24 May)
Tom Wainwright - Barrister at GCC (24 May)
Colin Cook - Head clerk at GCC (24 May)
David de Menezes - GCC, Head of Marketing (25 May)
Kathryn Cronin - barrister at GCC (25 May)
Michelle Brewer - barrister at GCC at time, now left and a judge (26 May)
Stephanie Harrison - joint head of chambers (26 May)

To Come

Closing arguments for AB, GCC, and SW (20 June)

OP posts:
IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 16:00

BC is gay. I don't know if we know if he has a husband.

dunBel · 20/06/2022 16:02

Who was that having a small coughing fit just now?

Hagiography · 20/06/2022 16:03

And the whole of Mumsnet sighs

ickky · 20/06/2022 16:03

Just reading SW closing statement no. 50 point. They say that SW does NOT reclassify sex with gender and has NOT reclassified homosexuality as same SEX to same Gender attraction.

What a load of bollocks, they have said both in public on record. Liars!

OP posts:
vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 20/06/2022 16:03

I am sure I read on here that BC is married to a man.

Even if he was single and partial to a matronly body he's far too shiny to be dribbled on by the likes of me <sigh>

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 20/06/2022 16:04

dunBel · 20/06/2022 16:02

Who was that having a small coughing fit just now?

EJG, Dun.

She's got a wee strepsil now, I think.

Ameanstreakamilewide · 20/06/2022 16:04

Too shiny! 😂

tigertactics · 20/06/2022 16:06

ickky · 20/06/2022 16:03

Just reading SW closing statement no. 50 point. They say that SW does NOT reclassify sex with gender and has NOT reclassified homosexuality as same SEX to same Gender attraction.

What a load of bollocks, they have said both in public on record. Liars!

Exactly. And a quick glance at their website and twitter confirms that. It's a flat lie.

WomensLandArmy · 20/06/2022 16:06

Where's Hochy gone?

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 20/06/2022 16:07

Just reading SW closing statement no. 50 point. They say that SW does NOT reclassify sex with gender and has NOT reclassified homosexuality as same SEX to same Gender attraction.

I just read that too. They literally just say "we didn't" and advance zero arguments to support it. Wow.

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 16:07

IO disappeared long ago!

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 16:07

AH is there. I'm assuming he's going to want to say something at the end.

WomensLandArmy · 20/06/2022 16:08

Praise be, he's back.

KatVonlabonk · 20/06/2022 16:08

Having been kicked off twitter for making a joke about a ferret down the trousers (which I refuse to delete), can I just thank you all for this thread, its much more entertaining than trying to understand the Tribunal Tweets (splendid though they are)

Ameanstreakamilewide · 20/06/2022 16:08

Just heard the little birdies...

CriticalCondition · 20/06/2022 16:09

BC- it doesn't matter if SW's email to GCC was an 'instruction' to them to get rid of AB which they didn't comply with if it still induced them to apply a detriment to her ie the investigation.

Ameanstreakamilewide · 20/06/2022 16:09

@KatVonlabonk Can you share the joke, or is it verboten here, as well?

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 20/06/2022 16:10

IO disappeared long ago!

Is it possible they've disappeared off the screen because they haven't been talking? Even given the massive amount of contempt they've treated the tribunal with, just fucking off for the last afternoon seems a bit much.

Potstip · 20/06/2022 16:10

Just wanted to say a massive thank you to those updating the thread and commenting. I'm gutted not to be able to see this bit - especially BC. Work expects me to work which is annoying when there's something this important happening.

Love and light to AB. I hope the outcome is the one you deserve, but either way you've been amazing and shining a light on this shit show is wonderful.

ickky · 20/06/2022 16:11

tigertactics · 20/06/2022 16:06

Exactly. And a quick glance at their website and twitter confirms that. It's a flat lie.

Is it Perjury to deliberately lie out of your arse mislead the Tribunal?

Does anyone know?

OP posts:
dunBel · 20/06/2022 16:11

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 20/06/2022 16:04

EJG, Dun.

She's got a wee strepsil now, I think.

Ah that explains why she'd put herself on mute for a bit. Poor woman looks like she could really do with a stiff drink by now.

LipbalmOrKnickers · 20/06/2022 16:12

I can still see her, she's just very small (and also far away.)

oviraptor21 · 20/06/2022 16:12

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 20/06/2022 16:10

IO disappeared long ago!

Is it possible they've disappeared off the screen because they haven't been talking? Even given the massive amount of contempt they've treated the tribunal with, just fucking off for the last afternoon seems a bit much.

Screen is still showing. They have vacated their seat/desk. They could of course still be in the room (as could RMW).

ickky · 20/06/2022 16:13

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 20/06/2022 16:10

IO disappeared long ago!

Is it possible they've disappeared off the screen because they haven't been talking? Even given the massive amount of contempt they've treated the tribunal with, just fucking off for the last afternoon seems a bit much.

😂

It wouldn't surprise me.

OP posts:
Roseglen84 · 20/06/2022 16:13

IdisagreeMrHochhauser · 20/06/2022 16:00

BC is gay. I don't know if we know if he has a husband.

Fair enough, I can still dream (swoon).

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread