From TT
We're back
J - KS ready?
KS - yes
J - if need a break say
NC - the mendion of health care assist seemed to upset you a great deal why
KS - i spoke to her about being a witness, didn't herself or her name to be involved in this case.
NC - upset because wanted to protect upset due to anxiety
KS - said dind't want any part because as a mixed race person, that SP views about her race would impact working together going forward
NC - youre asking us to believe your concern over how SP would treat her, caused that outburst?
KS - I'm kind, don't want to cause harm through this case
NC - do you agree she was an important witness
KS - agree
NC - only person who can shed light on DU's allegations about patient who left.
KS - I agree.
NC - ref bundle 484 look at qu 2 and answer, then I'll ask qu
NC - AG asked this witness a commendably open question, answer was flat contradiction of DU said...
JR interrupts.
(NC) withdraws. Repeat qu. her evidence flatly contradicts.
KS - says can't recall the conv
NC - but recalls there was a conv
KS - doesn't say which 3 people presen
Fifer : backchat with NC. Sure, how no gie that a try an let ays ken hoo ye got on?
NC - it does, it says there was a conv about a child who went missing.
KS - says she was unable to recall the conv
NC - saying it didn't happen?
KS - recalls there was a conv, not what it was, contradicts herself
NC - asked in chief about subsequent conv with this witness
NC -was it subsequent to AG interview with her?
KS - dont recall when it happened.
NC - in broad terms?
KS - no, beth, only knew of incident on 29th dec, not specifics of support worker name... don't recall
NC - you were asked, whether you had had any sub conv re 2nd incident
NC - can't help at all? spring? summer?
KS - it's been a long process, its all blurred into one between dec and now.
NC - this is a conv that caused you such anxiety for her, might be burnt in memory?
JR - didn't say that and repetitive questioning unlikely to help