Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #38

1000 replies

nauticant · 22/07/2025 23:17

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36
Thread 37: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378200-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-37

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:20

That the alleged witness was in fear of coming forward because she was afraid that SP with her racist views might return to work is a remarkable piece of testimony.

OP posts:
KateShugakIsALegend · 23/07/2025 14:20

I think two things would be helpful:

  1. An initial post at the start of each thread asking people to reflect before replying to goady posts.
  1. Each of us to take a moment / check the poster's form / history before replying to goady posts.

There are other threads on which you can engage with the goaders (but be warned, they have form for not answering direct questions)

FlatfacedCattypuss · 23/07/2025 14:20

Why was Kate Searle speaking to anyone about being a witness?!

RedToothBrush · 23/07/2025 14:20

RabbitFurCoat · 23/07/2025 14:19

Wouldn't they be dying to get that racism accusation backed up if they had an actual witness? This makes no sense

The person concerned knew that KS was a total shit stirrer.

FatCyclist · 23/07/2025 14:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 23/07/2025 14:21

Tandora · 23/07/2025 13:59

A transwoman in a woman’s space is not the definition of predatory. No.

Anywqy, back to the proceedings shall we?

Please stop misgendering DU - from evidence they consider themselves a woman and not a robot therefore they are a biological woman not a transwoman

Butchyrestingface · 23/07/2025 14:21

According to the great and the good on Twitter, one K Searles is in the women's bogs, having a meltdown. Or at least she was 8 minutes ago.

Ain't life grand?

Jerabilis · 23/07/2025 14:21

Ooo, JR tried to interrupt there and suggest that NC had mis-characterized something, only to have to withdraw it!

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:21

There's secret evidence from a witness of my side that we can't give to the Tribunal because the Claimant is a racist and to be afraid of. But we want you to give credence to this witness.

OP posts:
LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 14:21

KS ‘I’m kind, didn’t want to cause upset’ except to SP obviously, whom she has set out not only to upset and discredit but to destroy. The very last thing KS is is kind. Unbelievable self regard.

Tandora · 23/07/2025 14:22

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 23/07/2025 14:21

Please stop misgendering DU - from evidence they consider themselves a woman and not a robot therefore they are a biological woman not a transwoman

I'm happy to call her a trans woman. Thanks

GreenFriedTomato · 23/07/2025 14:22

GreenFriedTomato · 23/07/2025 14:17

Hang on. The witness did not want to be involved in this case. If you've admitted you've witnessed something can you refuse to be involved?

Oh my God she's now suggesting Sandie would have discriminated against her because she's a racist!

Sorry,.not discriminated against her. The suggestion is that because Sandie is a racist she would have targeted her if she found out she had given evidence against her. Again all unprovable because said witness hasn't put anything in writing. It's just Searle's word (and fake loud tears).

Shortshriftandlethal · 23/07/2025 14:22

Abigail in 'The Crucible' comes to mind.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 23/07/2025 14:22

Tandora · 23/07/2025 14:22

I'm happy to call her a trans woman. Thanks

We can still call him a bloke right?

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 14:22

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:21

There's secret evidence from a witness of my side that we can't give to the Tribunal because the Claimant is a racist and to be afraid of. But we want you to give credence to this witness.

Unbelievable 😳

Harassedevictee · 23/07/2025 14:22

OMG KS is suddenly realising how big a pile 💩 DrU may have landed her in.

BeKindWisely · 23/07/2025 14:22

TheKeatingFive · 23/07/2025 14:15

Who is she protecting?

Could it be JD?

GoldThumb · 23/07/2025 14:22

Should KS be asking anyone directly about being a witness?
Surely a job for the legal team.

KS does it all doesn’t she. Legal, HR….

Lunde · 23/07/2025 14:22

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:21

There's secret evidence from a witness of my side that we can't give to the Tribunal because the Claimant is a racist and to be afraid of. But we want you to give credence to this witness.

Begs the question why KS was trawling for complaints as she wasn't the investigator

BeLemonNow · 23/07/2025 14:23

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:20

That the alleged witness was in fear of coming forward because she was afraid that SP with her racist views might return to work is a remarkable piece of testimony.

Agreed my Qs are

  1. Based on what KS has previously "inferred", did she actually say that or is KS inferring that Sandie is racist.

  2. Was Sandie racist towards her or is this still the racist rumours / someone telling R that Sandie was a racist.

Tandora · 23/07/2025 14:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I have not done any such thing in any way shape or form.

Shall not be engaging with you further.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 23/07/2025 14:23

SidewaysOtter · 23/07/2025 14:19

From TT:

NC - upset due to anxiety
KS - said dind't want any part because as a mixed race person, that SP views about her race would impact working together going forward
NC - youre asking us to believe your concern over how SP would treat her, caused that outburst?
KS - I'm kind, don't

Wait, so KS is trying to say that Peggie is so racist that a mixed-race member of staff was too frightened to be involved in the tribunal for fear of reprisals?

WTF??

I think it is much more likely that the nurse didn’t want to get involved due to possible bullying by her own employer if she didn’t toe the party line.

Keenovay · 23/07/2025 14:23

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:21

There's secret evidence from a witness of my side that we can't give to the Tribunal because the Claimant is a racist and to be afraid of. But we want you to give credence to this witness.

My witness goes to another school.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/07/2025 14:24

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 23/07/2025 14:21

KS ‘I’m kind, didn’t want to cause upset’ except to SP obviously, whom she has set out not only to upset and discredit but to destroy. The very last thing KS is is kind. Unbelievable self regard.

She’s a manipulative cry bully.

moto748e · 23/07/2025 14:24

BeLemonNow · 23/07/2025 14:23

Agreed my Qs are

  1. Based on what KS has previously "inferred", did she actually say that or is KS inferring that Sandie is racist.

  2. Was Sandie racist towards her or is this still the racist rumours / someone telling R that Sandie was a racist.

Implied, not inferred! 😀

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread