Dr Upton was clear in his testimony that he considered himself a biological woman. The implication was that he would consider it acceptable treat a female patient who requested single sex care. To be very clear that would potentially be an assault - an actual crime.
So your heroic doctor seems to have a tenuous grasp of biology and an equally tenuous grasp of basic medical ethics and patient consent.
The NHS instituted an unlawful policy and you are criticising the woman who was harmed by this unlawfulness rather than the organisation who created it and the man who benefited.
You couldn’t find the right side of history with a SatNav.