From TT
NC But you've said a separate space could be isolating, so that is a disadvantage
IB Potentially
NC [to bundle] We asked q c proportions men/women of board's employment. You said you thought board employed roughly 50/50
IB I said over 50%
NC Sorry, yes. A great deal over 50%
(how does she know, without doing all their chromosomes, anyway?)
NC Board knew when giving theses figures of 3 staff with t id - roughly right
JR Only third employees provided info c gender status..
NC Fair assumption it's right as order of magnitude?
IB Can't use this data as representative of organisation. Our disability data isn't recording isn't comprehensive, as I said
NC Not going to be in 100s
IB no
NC Have c 10,000 staff
IB Would be surprised if over 100
NC This signals to all these 1000s of staff they can't be confident that f spaces in hospital won't be f only
IB That would depend on how the w see id of t ppl
NC All this done for validation of t staff at expense of 8,500 w
IB Not done for validation
NC Don't have to do this. Could offer t staff use of a third space.
IB If there was. Don't believe was a third space
NC Could you address their rights by a third space
IB Don't know how t ppl would fee about that - not discussed
JR need to put assumptions here directly to witness
NC You said you don't believe t ppl have been engaged with re feelings about third space. What about women
IB Don't know if women engaged with
NC You are HR and Eq lead. Your job is to make sure board looks after all its staff. To cater for rights. What did you do to protect dignity etc of f staff
IB Back to code. They could be excluded if proportionate.
(edit to put last tweet before break)