Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #6

1000 replies

nauticant · 07/02/2025 12:34

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 January 2025 and is expected to continue for 2 weeks. The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton started giving evidence on 6 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely can be obtained by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse

Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2

Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3

Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4

Thread 5: www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
StellaAndCrow · 07/02/2025 12:54

J "it's best not to interrupt"- I think everyone in the court heard the end of that sentence as "a fool when they're confirming that they're a fool"!

Audible laughter in court.

murasaki · 07/02/2025 12:54

The judge is rightly getting tetchy.

Sarahbackinthesaddle · 07/02/2025 12:54

JR is red faced and getting crosser by the minute

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 07/02/2025 12:54

She's livid. J isn't having any of it.

ArabellaScott · 07/02/2025 12:54

Judge - 'where there's a reference to change'

JR - 'it's said that there's a mystery, mention of Esther then investigators were different people - I can explain that'

CriticalCondition · 07/02/2025 12:54

JR - Davidson's only involvement was to collect a statement from Beth.
Judge - is Fife's position that Davidson undertook an investigation?
JR - I wouldn't call it that but will take instructions.

Mmmnotsure · 07/02/2025 12:54

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:54

When is an investigation not an investigation?

A transinvestigation?

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:54

StellaAndCrow · 07/02/2025 12:54

J "it's best not to interrupt"- I think everyone in the court heard the end of that sentence as "a fool when they're confirming that they're a fool"!

Audible laughter in court.

Yes, never interrupt etc etc

TWETMIRF · 07/02/2025 12:55

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:54

When is an investigation not an investigation?

Transvestigation

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:55

@Mmmnotsure 🤣

JasmineAllen · 07/02/2025 12:55

prh47bridge · 07/02/2025 12:52

I'm not watching the case but the judge's reported comments here show that he agrees there has been material non-disclosure. This is very bad for the defendants. The fact NC is going for a more specific order for disclosure suggests that, rather than winning the case on the basis of non-disclosure, she wants to air the defendant's dirty washing in public.

Edited to correct whose dirty washing should be aired!

Edited

I really hope their dirty washing is well and truly out in the open by the end of this.

ArabellaScott · 07/02/2025 12:55

'Ann Hamilton had a verbal discussion with Esther, aren't any docs, in Feb 2024, during discussion, she will say she realised Esther had been involved in incident, because Esther told her claimant had approached her with concerns, when Anne Hamilton realised that in that conversation, she todl Esther she could not be invovled in investigation. That's why there was a change'.

StellaAndCrow · 07/02/2025 12:56

JR: Anne hamilton decided that any IX should not be done by Esther
AH is coming to the tribunal to give evidence

AH realised that Esther was involved in the incident (so told her she couldn’t be involved in IX) - this discussion was undocumented

ArabellaScott · 07/02/2025 12:56

'The 1st respondents deal with things by talking to each other because they're in a busy A&E environment'

nauticant · 07/02/2025 12:56

Russell currently explaining why there was a lack of documentation about the investigation. It's the best she can do but it's a bad thing to admit.

OP posts:
Sarahbackinthesaddle · 07/02/2025 12:56

Gosh she's so rude in her approach.

ArabellaScott · 07/02/2025 12:56

JR - they have Teams meetings

Judge - did anyone take a note of that meeting

JR - no, they talked to each other

TWETMIRF · 07/02/2025 12:56

ArabellaScott · 07/02/2025 12:56

'The 1st respondents deal with things by talking to each other because they're in a busy A&E environment'

Whereas the 2nd respondent is in a busy A&E environment making copious notes about colleagues

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:57

Unbelievable - JR is trying to pretend that the documents not disclosed are not relevant even though Judge Tinder (?) made an order specifically requested all docs disclosed.

katmarie · 07/02/2025 12:57

OK so we're going with 'nothing to see here, Esther wasn't involved in the investigation'
Apart from taking DU's statement....
and discussing the case with at least one other person...
and then presumably being involved in a discussion that she shouldn't be involved...
Which was conveniently not documented...

bumbledenbarsk · 07/02/2025 12:57

she sounds cross and argumentative which will not be going down well.

Szygy · 07/02/2025 12:57

‘They’re in a busy A&E department’ - what the A&E department where a male doctor was bursting into tears about micro-aggressions and not being looked in the eye, therefore needing to make a complaint about ‘hate’?

Sarahbackinthesaddle · 07/02/2025 12:58

Judges body language says he's done with her shit

StellaAndCrow · 07/02/2025 12:58

JR saying there's no documentation because meetings were done via Teams because "busy A+E department" - tries to move swiftly on
Judge replies - lets take that Teams mtg as an example - did anyone take notes
JR - no.

chilling19 · 07/02/2025 12:58

katmarie · 07/02/2025 12:57

OK so we're going with 'nothing to see here, Esther wasn't involved in the investigation'
Apart from taking DU's statement....
and discussing the case with at least one other person...
and then presumably being involved in a discussion that she shouldn't be involved...
Which was conveniently not documented...

Also producing a report recommending that Sandie's suspension be lifted

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread