To be utterly disgusted by "DDLG"?

[BumbleBeeeeeee]

On a Facebook mum group, someone started a thread about kinks. No problem with kinky things whatsoever, do whatever you want in your own home. But someone mentioned the acronym DDLG which was explained to mean "daddy dom/little girl". Ie female/"sub" pretending to be a child in the bedroom. Talk of sticker books and colouring in and pretending to be a certain age, more often than not toddler/preschool age.
That mothers can do this and happily have kids with men who want to fuck them while they're pretending to be children is absolutely vile and shocking.
It cant just be me?!

That's a weird topic for a Facebook mums group! I would wonder whether the person admitting to it got a thrill out of admitting it iyswim....

Yeah it's weird but from what I know about this link, they have this thing called 'little space' where they regress to the age of a small child - usually due to past trauma. They don't actually have sex during little space, they just pretend to be a child and the carer cares for them like a parent would... When they're not in 'little space' then they have safe, consenting sex.

It's not something I'd do, but then again I'm not dealing and trying to cope with horrific childhood trauma.

I learnt all this on tik too, I'd recommend. Search for 'kink SSC' there's a lot of people on there educating about kink.

Grim

I think I'm on that group OP. I'm actually rather horrified that so many women - who have public profile that name their husband and link to his profile - are so open about their sexual exploits.

Genuinely surprised anyone would admit to being so maladjusted but as a pp said, perhaps they get off on people knowing. Ick.

Bloody hell, Facebook has strayed very far from God’s light

Search YouTube for Sammich and Lollipops for a couple like this who show everything about the lifestyle on their channel. It is a real eye opener, but if it stops him going near real children then so be it

Don't doubt your gut response here !

Yick. And I would suggest that far from stopping them going near 'real' chldren, it's more likely to normalise sexualising children for them.

I've seen comments about this on various mainstream sites. It seems quite popular which is deeply worrying.
Traumatized women pretending to be kids and men who get off on roleplaying raping and dominating their own daughters. GRIM.

It's not to my taste but as long as it's not illegal I can't get worked up about what two consenting adults do with each other in their own bedroom.

It goes far deeper though than just role play in the bedroom. Men must be aroused by the thought of sex with children to actually take part in that sort of bedroom stuff. I would run a mile if my partner ever showed any interest in this sort of thing. It’s absolutely sick.

There were a ton of them on Tumblr, a 13+ site, roleplaying and harassing real teenage girls.

Jesus Christ. Absolutely revolting. People like that need to be in prison. Not near children.

It is grim but isn’t it the flip side of men who like to wear diapers/nappies and a bonnet and be babied?

Yuk!

It's 'just' a kink/role play. I don't think there's a link between it and being an actual paedo. The woman isn't actually a child after all, and both of them know that all along.

I don't think there's a link between it and being an actual paedo.

Why are those daddy doms harassing teens online then?
And why specifically roleplay peado scenarios?

I think @Hilleni is right that they don't usually shag as part of the role play, that really would be perverted. As far as it goes is maybe something like 'you've been a naughty girl' and giving her a slap.

Welcome to the internet

I saw a documentary style vlog once about a couple who do this once, to be honest it looked very driven by the woman and the bloke just looked awkward.

I appreciate not the same in all relationships but he really did not look into the whole thing at all.

The woman isn't actually a child after all, and both of them know that all along.

So would you be okay with child sex dolls? They are not “actually” a child and the user knows that.

@TheChampagneGalop Am not saying that they mightn't have some dodgy types just like any community, religion, anything. But just like an Xtian paedo doesn't represent what most Xtians are like, a paedo doesn't represent what most people into age play are like.

What. The. Fuck.

Absolutely not my scene, but as long as no children are actually involved, I can’t see it doing any actual harm. But maybe I just don’t get it??