Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be utterly disgusted by "DDLG"?

199 replies

BumbleBeeeeeee · 26/08/2020 20:13

On a Facebook mum group, someone started a thread about kinks. No problem with kinky things whatsoever, do whatever you want in your own home. But someone mentioned the acronym DDLG which was explained to mean "daddy dom/little girl". Ie female/"sub" pretending to be a child in the bedroom. Talk of sticker books and colouring in and pretending to be a certain age, more often than not toddler/preschool age.
That mothers can do this and happily have kids with men who want to fuck them while they're pretending to be children is absolutely vile and shocking.
It cant just be me?!

OP posts:
SoulofanAggron · 26/08/2020 22:05

@BubblyBarbara A woman isn't a child sex doll. She will have grown up woman's anatomy and ability to consent.

BubblyBarbara · 26/08/2020 22:15

ability to consent.

Are you suggesting that inanimate objects are inappropriate in sexual contexts because they can’t consent?

Thatbliddywoman · 26/08/2020 22:18

It isnt something I'd be interested in but I have a hard time being concerned about what consenting adults do in their own bedrooms.

Yellownotblue · 26/08/2020 22:20

I’m happy to be an outlier here, and say that it’s not the role of society or government to police what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. There’s all sort of reasons - some due to trauma, some due to early experiences, and some just down to personal preferences- for people to have different sexualities. Just because something isn’t my/your cup of tea, doesn’t make it vile, illegal or immoral.

Let people be. If you want to get het up about something that actually matters, focus on non-consensual.

SeasideMaiden · 26/08/2020 22:22

It's not just women role-playing as babies, toddlers or children - men do, too. Daddy-daughter little-girl is a more often used phrase for DD/LG. They're usually ABDL (adult baby diaper lovers) also. Some do take it further while in 'little space', but it very much is about an adult male or female being babied and cared for, not actual children. It's meant to be nurturing, and always consensual.

Please don't get the wrong idea. Yes I know a lot about that scene. But that's because I used to belong to some forums for kink, mine are much much less interesting or odd and in fact don't feel put off the ordinary at all. I left the forums because I was constantly approached by vile creepy men who got off on writing to me with these creepy fetish stories about what they'd do to me.

But it really isn't about children. It's very related to those awful puppy play people (cringe, so much cringe). Ugh.

HorridHamble · 26/08/2020 22:23

I’m repulsed by that. I’ve seen a documentary about guys pretending to be babies, wearing nappies and saying ‘goo goo ga ga’, and have heard of ‘Furries’ but I find this more disturbing. I am not ok with sexualising children EVER, even in a fucked up role play context.

Thatbliddywoman · 26/08/2020 22:23

@Yellownotblue x post :)

Burnthurst187 · 26/08/2020 22:25

There's a lot of women out there that are more than happy to dress up in a school uniform pretending to be a schoolgirl and let their husband shag them. I've always found that very concerning. A man fantasizing about shagging a young teen or even younger and partner role playing it. Sick

Mum2jenny · 26/08/2020 22:28

As long as no children are involved, I feel it is very much up to consenting adults to do what they want in their own private spaces. This is Irrespective of whether it is a societal norm or not

Yellownotblue · 26/08/2020 22:29

@Thatbliddywoman yours was a lot more concise, a wonderful quality 🙂

WoolyMammoth55 · 26/08/2020 22:30

In my wild youth I had a friend who was a woman porn director. Very sex-literate, had a lot of advanced degrees in human sexuality and had done the field work too!

She talked very eloquently to me often about how our earliest sexual memories often stay with us for life - that as we grow into our understanding of ourselves as sexual beings, hopefully at the end of childhood/start of adulthood, those experiences imprint deeply on us.

So I guess that's one possible explanation for what's going on here to make it work for the "LG"s in the mix?

But ultimately I do think that consenting adult kink is rarely harmful. There's a lot in the world to stress about today, I personally don't think this makes the top 100. :)

AyeRobot · 26/08/2020 22:31

If it's not about sex, why is it a kink not larping?

Porcupineinwaiting · 26/08/2020 22:33

If you want society to start policing what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes and heads you'd better bring lunch and a good book.

BohemianDream · 26/08/2020 22:33

Its absolutely awful. I feel like as i get older the world further reveals itself as a massive peadophile ring. It seems that if nobody is being hurt then its fair game to suggest or fantasise about whatever you like including the rape of a child. Honestly I wish that the thought police were real sometimes.
I hate humans, why are there so many perverts..why do so many people think this is okay?
It makes me want to implode.

Cadent · 26/08/2020 22:36

I doubt adults dressing like babies is a new phenomenon. It’s probably like cross dressing.

VoldemortsMaid · 26/08/2020 22:37

I honestly thought I was quite... open to most things but this and everything to do with it makes me feel so nauseous Confused

BohemianDream · 26/08/2020 22:37

Sorry to come across as a nutcase. I just found out about several sex offenders in my neighbourhood and this thread tipped me.
Confused

Lockheart · 26/08/2020 22:42

You cannot be serious. Thought police indeed.

As long as everyone involved is of legal age and consenting then of course you can't police what people enjoy sexually, just because you personally find it distasteful.

Similarly people are allowed to fantasise about whatever and whoever they like - things that go on in someone's head are not illegal, no matter how immoral they would be if acted out in real life.

I would be in line to be sued by quite a number of men for unauthorised use of their image...

Porcupineinwaiting · 26/08/2020 22:43

But "nobody getting hurt" is important. So many people (including children) are getting hurt, why not concentrate our energy on them and the people who are perpetrating that harm?

Midsommar · 26/08/2020 22:44

Yeah it's weird but nothing illegal about it. Different strokes for different folk I guess.

Mooballs · 26/08/2020 22:44

I was abused as a child and find this utterly abhorent and incomprehensible. I cannot imagine engaging with DH in this under any circumstances. Grim in the extreme.

Sarahlou63 · 26/08/2020 22:45

If no one is being harmed then it's nobody else's business. The human brain is capable of every type of thought. No one has the ability to stop those thoughts, only to distinguish between what's morally acceptable and what's not. Puppy play, baby play (both sexes), pony play are widespread and harmless in 99.9% of people.

Guineapigbridge · 26/08/2020 22:45

And people let their kids watch YouTube all day long with videos of this kind of shit on it.

justasking111 · 26/08/2020 22:46

Is this FB thing a covert way to attract new members to something, private messaging going on. There was something like this years ago on a dating website. A colleague got involved was renting airbnb place near her home and setting up weekends. I only know because the company found her using her work e-mail to set them up. We were all hauled in to HR to see what we knew. She was sacked.

EinsteinaGogo · 26/08/2020 22:46

@TheHappyHerbivore

Bloody hell, Facebook has strayed very far from God’s light
😂😂😂😂
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.