Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Was what he did so terrible?

346 replies

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:10

A friend is a member of a sports club.

He came across the profile of one of the women from the club on a dating site. Woman is married to a committee member from the club.

Friend was worried. Either she had been cloned or was behaving erratically. So, friend mentioned it to the safeguarding officer at the club. This is a woman who is best friends with dating profile woman, so he expected she'd be sympathetic to profile woman, have a quiet word and between them they'd do what needed doing (if anything) .

It turned out the profile was genuine and that the marriage had ended, although that was not public knowledge. No one was discreet about friend's "interfering" and he is now being vilified as a busy body, when all he was trying to do was make sure this woman wasn't vulnerable.

Possibly I'd have spoken to profile woman directly, but I understand why he felt it more comfortable to speak with her friend who happened to be responsible for safeguarding.

Just in case anyone thinks safeguarding is only about children, it's not. There are no child members at this club, but in line with its governing body, it still requires a safeguarding officer.

OP posts:
LoyalMintOtter · 26/08/2026 12:38

People are making up some rediculous threads on here at the moment.

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:39

Stormyrose · 26/08/2026 12:36

I think you must have skin in the game here, as you can’t see how this is very wrong, yes speak to her, or her husband or ignore it. Not tell her mate, of course others reactions are as they are as it was none of his business.

who is he to you as you’re defending this , which makes it seem like you just wanted people to agree with his and your view.

My "skin" is that he's my friend and has been for a long long time. He can be odd socially but he's not nasty and he's not a gossip. If he was he'd have told me before he went to the safeguarding woman and I'd have almost certainly advised against, but he didn't breathe a word to anyone, except someone who he should surely have expected discretionary from.

OP posts:
Ilovemyfam · 26/08/2026 12:40

Is he not behaving erratically by going on a dating site? Should you report him to the safeguarding officer?

WildGarlicSoup · 26/08/2026 12:40

Safeguarding women didn't do a very job of safeguarding your friend, did she? I would ask her why on Earth she gave her friend your friend's name.

I would be very annoyed with her, actually. Your friend did nothing wrong.

CmNO · 26/08/2026 12:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Trumpisacunt · 26/08/2026 12:41

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:14

He concern was that "she" wasn't on the site but that someone else was using her details.

I think he was misguided but well intentioned.

So why didn't he speak to the woman directly?

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:42

Ilovemyfam · 26/08/2026 12:40

Is he not behaving erratically by going on a dating site? Should you report him to the safeguarding officer?

Haha. Single man who makes no secret of the fact he's on dating sites v apparently happily married woman?

OP posts:
malefields · 26/08/2026 12:42

I don’t think he was being a busybody, his mistake was not going to the person concerned directly really.

Inauthentic · 26/08/2026 12:42

Yeah, it does sound like he may be socially inept or have quite a low level of emotional awareness.
The safeguarding person wasn’t particularly secretive about it, so I think the bigger issue is that she appears to have spread the gossip in the first place.

GinaandGin · 26/08/2026 12:42

user85642879067 · 26/08/2026 12:18

Interesting - there is a virtually identical thread running where someone has spotted a female workmates husband on tinder and everyone is saying absolutely they must tell the wife, and how dreadful it’d be to keep quiet.
Yet here where it’s a woman on the dating app, he’s a dreadful busybody who shouldn’t interfere…

Because he went to the safeguarding lead not the partner
Bit of a difference

CmNO · 26/08/2026 12:43

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:43

Trumpisacunt · 26/08/2026 12:41

So why didn't he speak to the woman directly?

Becuase he was shy/nervous? I think he got that wrong, but felt it was more appropriate to speak to someone who could help if there was an issue.

OP posts:
powersthatbe · 26/08/2026 12:43

Stopthattractor · 26/08/2026 12:35

I think it sounds like a sensible decision, especially given that he was concerned her details might have been stolen. If you choose not to announce your separation it's going to cause confusion.

ANNOUNCE THE SEPARATION!?

Is the online dater Gwyneth Paltrow?? If not, that’s a ridiculous comment. It’s absolutely none of anyone else’s business down the club!

OPs friend knew exactly what he was doing. And it’s unfair to now blame the safeguarding lead for any fallout who did exactly what he intended and followed it up with the subject. The subject is rightly miffed at the embarrassment of it all. Its played out badly for him and he needs to own his mistake. And probably apologise if anyone is willing to take him seriously.

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I'm not his BFF, but nice try. Because he wasn't gossiping?

OP posts:
CmNO · 26/08/2026 12:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

GladBiscuit · 26/08/2026 12:45

user85642879067 · 26/08/2026 12:18

Interesting - there is a virtually identical thread running where someone has spotted a female workmates husband on tinder and everyone is saying absolutely they must tell the wife, and how dreadful it’d be to keep quiet.
Yet here where it’s a woman on the dating app, he’s a dreadful busybody who shouldn’t interfere…

I was about to say this!! Swap the gender roles and it will be different responses all day.

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:45

powersthatbe · 26/08/2026 12:43

ANNOUNCE THE SEPARATION!?

Is the online dater Gwyneth Paltrow?? If not, that’s a ridiculous comment. It’s absolutely none of anyone else’s business down the club!

OPs friend knew exactly what he was doing. And it’s unfair to now blame the safeguarding lead for any fallout who did exactly what he intended and followed it up with the subject. The subject is rightly miffed at the embarrassment of it all. Its played out badly for him and he needs to own his mistake. And probably apologise if anyone is willing to take him seriously.

I'm not sure that telling profile woman where the information came from is what was expected?

OP posts:
Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:47

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I really don't. He's nearly 20 years younger than me and probably slightly vulnerable himself.

OP posts:
HumberSquid · 26/08/2026 12:47

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:14

He concern was that "she" wasn't on the site but that someone else was using her details.

I think he was misguided but well intentioned.

If so then the person to have mentioned this to was her.

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 26/08/2026 12:48

Babbyy · 26/08/2026 12:31

I said I would have spoken to her directly, so I don't think he got it right, but I don't think he was being a gossip. He was concerned that either she'd been cloned/hacked or that she was having some sort of breakdown.

Maybe he overthought things and there was no need to do anything, but he spoke to the person at the club he felt best placed to support the woman.

I posted because I thought discussing things and hearing others' views was what MN is for. I'm interested to see most people wouldn't accept his explanation because I see nothing in him that suggests he was being nasty, only that he's socially inept.

You're assuming that intention and effect are the same thing.

If I set fire to someones coat with the intention of keeping them warm, then that intention doesn't really matter when they end up burning to death. I'm not being a helpful person, I'm a killer, regardless of my intent.

He may not have had the intention to be a gossip, but his actions were to gossip about someone to their friend. He wasn't being a helpful do-gooder, he was being a gossip.

CmNO · 26/08/2026 12:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

ThatCyanCat · 26/08/2026 12:50

I wouldn't ever get involved in something like this unless I knew the people involved very, very well and was close enough to them to be able to have the conversation. If I don't know the woman involved well enough to ask her myself directly, it isn't my business. At most I'd contact the site if I truly thought her data might have been stolen.

PurpleEmerald · 26/08/2026 12:50

Given (as far as I understand) most dating apps work at least partly on location, surely it was only a matter of time until someone came across her profile?

Also, he may have been a bit naive/shit stirring (it’s impossible for any of us to really say..) but she’s hardly kept her head down if she is the one who has gone around telling people? You could argue she’s causing as much drama as he is, perhaps more as he only told one person, who you could easily think should be keeping this type of thing on the down low. There was no need for the safeguarding lead to tell her friend exactly who had raised the concern. No one comes out of this looking great…

It seems to me a fairly typical cliquey, gossipy and two faced sports club community.

mondaytosunday · 26/08/2026 12:50

Yep he crossed a line, and he should have kept his beak out.

tara66 · 26/08/2026 12:51

The activity at this club is clearly not enough for this man. He has too much time on his hands. He may be too embarrassed to continue with this one anyway as everyone there will think he's a bit of a twat!