Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow Part 3

1000 replies

IDareSay · 05/09/2025 11:51

These threads are currently being used to follow the case that is taking place at Westminster Magistrate's Court over the 4th and 5th September, but will also be following the subsequent fallout of Graham's arrest at Heathrow on his return to the UK for this court case earlier this week.

He is currently on trial for alleged harassment of a trans identified male and criminal damage to the man's phone. The charges stem from a series of events in October 2024 at Battle of Ideas.

Part 1 here

Part 2 here

Graham's account of the arrest here

You can support his Substack here

Free Speech Union are running a fundraiser to support a claim against the Met in reference to the Heathrow arrest. Just search FSU and Graham Linehan fundraiser and it should be easy to find. Currently reached 93% of its target.

Most of the mainstream media have reported on the case, but none have covered it as well as Nick Wallis. Follow him on X for live posting from the court.
You can support Nick here (posted this morning Friday 5th September):

"I am deeply grateful to everyone who has seen fit to bung me the cost of a coffee, a pint or even a bloody London pint since I found out I was able to come back today. If you think you can afford to make a small donation, there’s more info here:"

https://store29806256.company.site

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow | Mumsnet

Arrested again! Details on his Substack. This is beyond a joke; 5 armed officers! [[https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/i-just-got-arrested-again ht...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5403191-graham-linehan-arrested-on-arrival-at-heathrow?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
RedToothBrush · 05/09/2025 12:20

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:18

There has to be tangible proof of alteration in a way that impairs its value.

Presumably once that is proved, there then has to be proof that it was as a result of GL’s actions.

Was the phone damaged?
did it impair the value of the phone?
was it caused by GL’s actions?

Edited

It was a four year old phone remember....

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 05/09/2025 12:20

CompleteGinasaur · 05/09/2025 12:18

Speaking of unicorn shit.

Is it Ok if I sit on on nebulous dog whistle?

[holds up instrument case]

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 12:21

CompleteGinasaur · 05/09/2025 12:19

Oops, sorry, @Charabanc, I meant the poster you were referring to, not you!

OK, yes, I was a little puzzled there 😆

Mad times.

Datun · 05/09/2025 12:21

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 05/09/2025 12:17

Tarquin has come across as such a credible witness so far so…

It's difficult to believe.

The number of people involved in trying to nail something on Graham Linehan, right down to a disgraced ex copper who seems to have massive leverage in the Met.

I hope the papers shout this from the rooftops. Along with photos, quotes, and asking the police what the fuck they were doing reopening a case on the basis of a call from a sacked cop.

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 12:22

Datun · 05/09/2025 12:21

It's difficult to believe.

The number of people involved in trying to nail something on Graham Linehan, right down to a disgraced ex copper who seems to have massive leverage in the Met.

I hope the papers shout this from the rooftops. Along with photos, quotes, and asking the police what the fuck they were doing reopening a case on the basis of a call from a sacked cop.

Lynsay Watson specialises in judicial appeals. Spurts them round all over the place. That's the threat that got this case moving again.

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:22

Waiting for Nick.

He may start a new thread or reply on the current one as he did yesterday. So I’m checking the thread for replies, and his account for a new thread.

Datun · 05/09/2025 12:23

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 12:22

Lynsay Watson specialises in judicial appeals. Spurts them round all over the place. That's the threat that got this case moving again.

But that's so bad. You shouldn't be able to intimidate the police into reopening a case they think is not criminal!

murasaki · 05/09/2025 12:24

My phone is 7 years old and I often knock it off the coffee table onto a hard floor, no damage whatsoever.

But I too think the verdict will be split. The harassment is sort of the most important one to be cleared of.

But ideally the Judge will at a minimum scold Tarquin for his behaviour.

NeverOneBiscuit · 05/09/2025 12:25

Having a hot line to the cops, offering to help draft another individuals witness statement? Hardly smacks of a group so marginalised, so oppressed that they can hardly leave their homes!

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:26

Sorry to keep you waiting. During the break Sarah Vine (Defence Counsel) and Julia Faure Walker (prosecuting counsel) were watching something on SV's phone. They had quite an intense discussion and then tipped off the clerk they were going to put something before the judge...

BettyBooper · 05/09/2025 12:27

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:22

Waiting for Nick.

He may start a new thread or reply on the current one as he did yesterday. So I’m checking the thread for replies, and his account for a new thread.

X Post!

RedToothBrush · 05/09/2025 12:27

Datun · 05/09/2025 12:23

But that's so bad. You shouldn't be able to intimidate the police into reopening a case they think is not criminal!

It's also not up to the police to carry forward a case. That's for the CPS. Don't forget them.

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:28

BettyBooper · 05/09/2025 12:27

X Post!

Edited

It means the final unroll will contain all of the day’s tweets.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 05/09/2025 12:28

murasaki · 05/09/2025 12:24

My phone is 7 years old and I often knock it off the coffee table onto a hard floor, no damage whatsoever.

But I too think the verdict will be split. The harassment is sort of the most important one to be cleared of.

But ideally the Judge will at a minimum scold Tarquin for his behaviour.

I would have thought, wasting the court's time.

This circus over claimed damage to a phone worth no more than £50

Useful vehicle to expose the lunacy of TRAs to the general public - GL's public profile ensures that this will be widely reported

Will be interesting to see if any of the news outlets start to reverse ferret a bit.

SternJoyousBee · 05/09/2025 12:29

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 12:22

Lynsay Watson specialises in judicial appeals. Spurts them round all over the place. That's the threat that got this case moving again.

Has he ever won one?

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:29

... on the judge's return. Judge duly came back at 12.15pm and SV told the judge she had received some potentially relevant video footage from a non-legal but trusted source, which may need to be examined before any ruling on the application to strike out the case.

There was a bit of chit chat as it's not completely clear what the footage shows, so what the judge has ordered is that the court is completely cleared of all but non-lawyers whilst they view the footage and decide whether it does show what it purports to show.

ErrolTheDragon · 05/09/2025 12:30

That intervention by LW with the policeman was astonishing, I mean that stuff about gl being able to raise 100k on a whim by crowdfunding (unlikely) and the whole tone that financially damaging GCs was a good thing that the police guy should be totally onside with.
(police guy according to the tweeted account called LW ‘him’, I noted)

Llamasarellovely · 05/09/2025 12:31

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:29

... on the judge's return. Judge duly came back at 12.15pm and SV told the judge she had received some potentially relevant video footage from a non-legal but trusted source, which may need to be examined before any ruling on the application to strike out the case.

There was a bit of chit chat as it's not completely clear what the footage shows, so what the judge has ordered is that the court is completely cleared of all but non-lawyers whilst they view the footage and decide whether it does show what it purports to show.

Can I just LOVE that typo - the court cleared of all but non-lawyers😂
Have the whole matter cleared up in no time if that were only so.

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:31

And if so whether witness statements and possibly evidence is given in court.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 05/09/2025 12:31

MyrtleLion · 05/09/2025 12:29

... on the judge's return. Judge duly came back at 12.15pm and SV told the judge she had received some potentially relevant video footage from a non-legal but trusted source, which may need to be examined before any ruling on the application to strike out the case.

There was a bit of chit chat as it's not completely clear what the footage shows, so what the judge has ordered is that the court is completely cleared of all but non-lawyers whilst they view the footage and decide whether it does show what it purports to show.

Oh my word!!! Hopefully in glinner’s favour if SV is wanting to submit it.

baggle · 05/09/2025 12:31

Thinking about what SionnachRuadh mentioned on the last thread about how it's something of an Irish thing to be unvarnished as Glinner is.

Means that he's at least partly being targeted because of his cultural background and his personality that's shaped by this. Being a bluntly outspoken Irishman who doesn't adhere to British middle-class conventions of politeness and restraint in his mannerisms is much of the reason why he's ended up hauled before a court on trumped-up harassment charges.

IDareSay · 05/09/2025 12:32

I think this new footage may be very bad news for Tarquin.

OP posts:
corlan · 05/09/2025 12:32

Charabanc · 05/09/2025 12:17

I do love your interventions 😆

Who was the old Father that would shout 'Feck, Women,Drink!.' ? It's very reminiscent of that.

NeverOneBiscuit · 05/09/2025 12:33

IDareSay · 05/09/2025 12:32

I think this new footage may be very bad news for Tarquin.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

RedToothBrush · 05/09/2025 12:33

SternJoyousBee · 05/09/2025 12:29

Has he ever won one?

Doesn't matter. It's still strategic litigation to intimidate and harass...

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread