Entitled male refused access to female changing area (despite wearing skirt)

[ACatCalledPushka]

Well done to the hotel staff. ‘trans ‘woman’ given key to the unisex changing room instead of the female changing room ‘trans woman’ not happy.

https://twitter.com/anneicoombes/status/1683090524641566721?s=46&t=5tHsrgY5T97exTqeFD4LWg

Exactly! So mis-used as an expression. It means it just takes one bad apple to spoil the rest, but the police and others seem to think as long as you can still rummage around and pull out the occasional undamaged apple there’s no problem, carry on.

I see he's deleted most of his social media accounts.

The archives still exist though, e.g.

https://archive.li/INUXS

Absolutely!

TW in EDI training: we just want to live our lives.

Women: you do know we can see the internet?

Bizarrely I really crave an Apple right now!

yup

middle aged men larping as women are creepy

we used to be allowed to know that. do you think we're allowed to know it again yet?

Well it's certainly getting harder for the other side of the argument to say that never happens!

Thanks Anne.

The trouble is at this point, it's like the mythical fully transitioned, lovely and slightly fraudulent male accountant.... (seen occasionally gamboling in the mists on the highlands) - the one they kept mentioning as the one who should be in a women's prison. It's just a myth.

And it's being leaned on to try and cling to women's sympathy long enough to abuse them a bit longer.

They also completely miss the fact that an accountant who is prepared to swindle his boss/clients is also likely not to give a shit about the boundaries of women!

All he wanted was to steal!

Yes. The whole 'it's just one unfortunate person, don't judge the whole group' line is long since over. It isn't just one, this isthe population we're talking about. These are common, regular features of the group. That women are expected to put up with in their spaces.

We're long since past #nothankyou and into #forgetitmate

Indeed, it is a feature not a bug.

Also yet more proof that it is not the space that is important it is the non consenting humans in that space. If it was just a case of I just want to pee/get changed then a Unisex space would be perfectly acceptable, everyone gets what they want, but that is not what they want, what they want is access to the female space and the females in it and they don't give a flying fuck how the females in that space feel. Usual misogynistic, selfish bollocks.

I think the 'one bad apple' argument only works if the rest of the barrel are prepared to stand up and say, "This is wrong. We don't support this. We don't want this behaviour in our community."

None of the usual suspects are mentioning it at all on twitter or elsewhere as far as I can see. It's the usual 'nothing to see here - look over there at those nasty bigots...'

Complete radio silence. Says more than what they think it does.

God. So he has applied for a GRC, because he thinks it's going to make the law 'on his side'.

A man who frequents websites that fetishise women breastfeeding, and violates teenage girls' changing rooms.

Fucking slow handclap to Kier Starmer who wants to facilitate these men.

Yep. The £5 easy access is horrific.

But would it make the law on AC's side? Does AC automatically get entry to women's changing rooms if a third space is available?

Well that's the million dollar five pound question isn't it?

If only Dodds had bothered to turn up to tell us

Maybe Keir will give us a steer.. off that fence

It's biological.

Labour think biology is determined by a five pound certificate and are proposing one stop GP shops, just like the SNP led NHS, to sell 100,000s of thousands of them to adults and children. The exceptions will continue to mean what men want.

The conservatives, led by the minister for Equality Kemi Badenoch, are trying to clear the way through the thicket of barristers blocking Baroness Kishwar Falkner, to implement EHRCs proposed actual biological underpinning of the EQ2010 exceptions and guidance. They will leave the GRA panel in place and the single sex exceptions will mean single sex exceptions.

Too many thousands! I think the ONS have the figures!

This is clear water between the two parties surely

Kemi’s version sounds encouraging- do you think she will do it? Pre GE too

It depends on how quickly the barristers unravel the mess that trans activists have built up to try and block it.

Sorry, a bit off topic but I googled Aimee Challenor cause I recognised the name but couldn't think why. On reading Aimee's wiki page, I remembered Aimee's dad's crimes but I did not realise about Aimee's husband's tweets. WTAF!!! Seriously, in plain sight, do they really think that people won't notice?

TW in EDI training: we just want to live our lives.

Women: you do know we can see the internet?

This!

Just seen this on Twitter, it's from the beginning of July, and it may well have been put up before, but I'll admit I'm to lazy to go through nearly 800 posts to check.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/01/london-pride-politics-trans-rights-climate-protest?CMP=share_btn_link

Lexi Kane, 34, from Farnham, Surrey, said: “It’s lovely to just be among everyone who’s like me. We won’t be forced back into the closet and this is a show of that.” Anne Coombes, 65, from Reading, added: “Well said. We’re being attacked from all sides.”

Anne Coombes, 65, from Reading, added: “Well said. We’re being attacked from all sides.”

Ah, so Anne Coombes does appreciate how it feels to be a woman these days. Attacked from all sides.

Anne Coombes is not being attacked.

Anne Coombes is riding roughshod over the rights, privacy and dignity of women and girls, and somehow claims to be surprised that they object.

The obvious expectation was that these inferior females roll over and capitulate to Anne's wants without a murmur of dissent, and a refusal to do this now constitutes a full-scale 'attack' on poor, badly-done-to Anne.

This movement has perfected the art of DARVO at its finest.