There are some posts towards the start of the thread that might help you work out what groups are involved.
However, if you think about recent controversies such as which group had Breslow as a trustee and also a communications manager who posed with an erect penis in an ‘artistic’ collage? Which other closely aligned charity has Peter Tatchell as its spokesperson who wrote about how not every act of sex with a child was abusive? And which group celebrates tolerance with images of males in dog fetish outfits on leashes being patted by children? And which group thinks it is marvellous diversity to have drag queens read to children in full costume? Lastly, which group had tried to ‘rebrand’ themselves by attempting to legitimise their sexual impulses if they don’t act on them and merely admit they are attracted to children?
It isn’t ‘one’ group’s failure, it is many of them.
To be clear, it is not specific to one sexual orientation either. The culprits have always been in society, it is nothing knew.
However, now you have groups supporting the lowering of sexual boundaries of children and adults in the name of tolerance and kindness for different reasons. Those reasons all contribute towards the outcome.
People pointing out the outcome are to be vilified and denounced as intolerant and phobic. Maybe even ‘out of date’, ‘not cool’ or ‘prudish’. Shamed for stating the obvious.
The statement released by the company organising this event mentioned the term ‘queer’ if that helps. As I said there was some discussion closer to the start of the thread.