And you know why this stuff was for "under 2s"? Because at over two, kids are starting to be verbal. And at four, they are going to point and say things like "Mummy, you can see that man's bottom." and "Mummy, why does that lady have no clothes on?"
'Cos they know. They know it's strange. They know people don't walk around in public places with no clothes on with their bottoms showing.
This is such a good point.
“Mummy, mummy, why is that man SHOWING HIS BOTTOM? You said I had to wear trousers or I couldn’t go to nursery. Why can he go out without trousers and I can’t?”
”Mummy, mummy, now that lady is isn’t wearing trousers either, how come she’s allowed to show her bottom? You said showing your bottom was rude and I mustn’t do it, that bottoms were for bathrooms, not playgroups”
”MUMMY YOU SAID CHAIRS ARE FOR SITTING NOT FOR HANDSTANDS!!!”
One of mine had a bizarrely precocious relationship with language, full sentences long before 2 and taught himself to read by putting the subtitles on for CBeebies.
He would’ve been a bloody nightmare for Cabababarave.
Lots of pointing and bellowing ‘OOOOOOOOHHHHH THAT’S RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE” and “I DON’T LIKE HER” followed by ‘WIG!’ and “DON’T LET THAT GIANT LADY-MAN TOUCH ME!”
He was a particularly odd child because he was a very late walker, a bum shuffler who didn’t even try and stand up until 18 months, so could talk well before he could reliably walk anywhere.
You know when a camera POV
peers into a pram in a vintage cartoon and finds a little old man in a bonnet, smoking a cigar? He was like that, only without the cigar.
Still, best not give Cabababarave any future ideas, they might decide to move forward in a more family friendly direction… by hiring Furries, Bronies and Adult Babies.