Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The police

732 replies

BlackForestCake · 04/11/2022 18:23

I was just thinking that the GC analysis is the only one that can explain the behaviour of police forces up and down the country.

The liberal position is “It’s awful that the police are institutionally racist and misogynist, but it’s great that they stand up for LGBTQ+ people!”

No. The promotion of trans ideology is part of the misogyny.

OP posts:
IcakethereforeIam · 05/12/2022 16:16

So, it's not just me whose eyes glaze over. Statement, not a question!

HatThatWearsYou · 05/12/2022 16:16

Yes that was as transparent as glass.

We've all encountered these types before, we know how to deal with it.

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 17:28

BernardBlacksMolluscs
Does it fucking occur to you, you insensitive fucking twerp, that the time for ‘explainy, me feel good like big man’ wasn’t that thread.
So what was that thread about then...?

And where have I made it all about 'me' and asked personal and inappropriate questions?

HatThatWearsYou
I am answering the questions - where am i talking over people? People that raise a point I will answer that point. That's the whole point of a discussion

What would you rather me do - just agree with everything that is being posted - even when I can see its not true?

The 'walls of words' is the explanation - unless you want just one word answers, but its not explaining anything.

So, if someone posts something on here which is wrong - like R v Roberts case law & police don't investigate defence alibis - do I just ignore it - or do i say its wrong and give the reasons why?

Imnobody4
Where have i demanded anything?

I am asking questions which are relevant to the thread. Most people on here are saying that we should ignore the person making the complaint against KJK - but we don't know what the actual complaint is. Why can't i ask what it is before we jump to conclusions? And that's a rhetorical question by the way.

ScreamingMeMe · 05/12/2022 17:31

Please, I beg of you all, just ignore the me-railer from now on. He's just going to keep on posting paragraphs of shite and ruining threads.

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 17:37

And the reason why i won't post which force I am in is because i don't know any of you on here. It's not difficult for someone to be able to trace me if they know what force i work for. This will include contact phone numbers for me.

My wife and family are sick of the death threats and the number of times I am followed home by unscrupulous people that i have prosecuted over the years - phone calls from jails in the middles of the night etc etc.

So - I'm not risking it.

HatThatWearsYou · 05/12/2022 17:37

Agree with @ScreamingMeMe and would rather take advice on law from the likes of @DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter who can prove he is who he says he is than some random, goady person who says they know it all.

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 17:39

ScreamingMeMe
If you disagree with anything, then discuss it

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 17:40

HatThatWearsYou
I wouldn't if they quote R v Roberts which has nothing to do with police interviews. But, its up to you

FlatCheese · 05/12/2022 18:12

Just read the "waiting for police..." thread. Felix - you seem to somehow think you're being helpful by "correcting" or "explaining". Honestly, it just comes across as cold. Every other poster said how sorry they were about what had happened to the OP and you told a woman who had just been assaulted that she wasn't a priority because the immediate threat had passed. It turned out you were right. The police didn't do anything.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 05/12/2022 18:14

yes, I'm sorry for venting my frustration

this person adds nothing. I will ignore from here on in

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 18:34

FlatCheese
And what would you rather me say - lie and say that she is top of the queue and the reason why police aren't getting there is because they are all catching motorists instead. Or the police should be there any second......

Or just add to the thread by saying - "its all terrible isn't it"

Or - do you want me tell you the truth about how things are and how jobs are risked assessed when they come in? Since i work in the job that's in question

IcakethereforeIam · 05/12/2022 18:38

@BernardBlacksMolluscs I think most of us can empathise.

HatThatWearsYou · 05/12/2022 18:39

Yeah don't apologise @BernardBlacksMolluscs it's easy to get frustrated by someone who is bad faith arguing.

Brefugee · 05/12/2022 20:54

At this stage, Felix, i think most people would like you to pay attention and listen. And not talk.

Bearyhumcrack · 05/12/2022 22:09

I think it is right to ignore Felix off this thread. I commit to this and will not respond.

@DennisNoelKavanaghOffTwitter is a good egg.

Felix125 · 05/12/2022 23:15

Pay attention to what precisely?

Brefugee · 06/12/2022 07:24

To. What. We. Are. Saying.

I get it. You want the last word. Well. No.

Happylittlechicken · 06/12/2022 07:32

Feels is the AH of policemen. Same empathy for women and complete lack of narcissism. 🙃

AlisonDonut · 06/12/2022 12:43

Men just cannot let women talk without interrupting or correcting them can they?

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 06/12/2022 12:51

I read AH

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 06/12/2022 12:54

posted too soon

as Amanda Holden. I’m guessing that isn’t what it stands for?

Happylittlechicken · 06/12/2022 13:01

Adrian Harrop. A gender zealot doctor humiliated on live TV by KJK then censured by the GMC.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 06/12/2022 13:22

Gotcha!

Felix125 · 06/12/2022 16:52

Brefugee
But what are you saying exactly?

We should ignore the person who is making the complaint against KJK - because what he is saying is not true - yet we don't actual know what he is reporting on this occasion?

Don't entertain vol interviews because you will incriminate yourself, just give your defence at court - yet the case can be NFA'd following the police interview without the need for it to go to court

What ever the defence statement you give to police is inadmissible at court anyway, so you may as well just go to court (R v Roberts) - yet the police interviews are under caution whether voluntary or not.

Everything I say is rubbish - yet I have said from the start that I don't agree with rainbow cars, rainbow lanyards, pin badges, poppies, charity ribbons at work - and our force doesn't either.

I have explained the way that jobs are graded as they come into the control room and dispatched - and why people sometimes have to wait

So I have listed to what is being said - unless there is something else I'm missing, but you need to be clear.

And are you wanting honest answers to the questions posed?

Bearyhumcrack · 09/12/2022 16:12

Had an email today from the officer handling my harassment complaint.

I have spoken to my supervision in relation to the crime you have reported on 25/07/22 – Harassment - [crime number], and the decision has been made that whilst the investigation is proceeding with XXX Police,
there are no further enquiries we can make and this investigation has been closed. If any new evidence becomes available about your crime this decision may be reconsidered.

What a bunch of self serving cunts. Because they are shit, I can't do anything about this woman harassing me. Nothing apparently.

All along when I report new harassment (weekly) I've been told, just save the information, when the investigation is over we will address it. And now this.

They haven't even taken a statement from me let alone made an enquiry. I'm furious.

They have not heard the last of me.

Felix, do one. I'm not interested in your victim blaming bullshit.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.