I'm not particularly interested in whether or not Sadowitz should have been cancelled.
Actually, thinking about this further, this is an incredibly chilling position.
Saying "I do not care whether anyone's freedom is infringed - it's not interesting." Fascist, much?
I mean, arguing for it on some grounds, saying that those grounds outweighed the freedom principles, that could be a moral view. As is, obviously, arguing that the freedom principles are important.
But saying "freedom principles aren't interesting"? And less interesting than content warnings!? Truly the model footsoldier.