Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince Harry & Meghan kids

250 replies

Jennalong · 21/06/2026 18:19

There is a photo of Harry with his children with reference to Fathers Day . It shows him cuddling his children , with the girl's face partially shown but the son is turned fully into Harry and you only see the back of his head.
In most photos that they post this is always the case .
Why do they do this ?

OP posts:
BillericayDickie · 21/06/2026 18:21

So that people comment on it

Pickledonions12 · 21/06/2026 18:22

Let's think. Nope. Can't think of a reason. It's just too difficult 🙄

noonames · 21/06/2026 18:25

Because they think that if they don’t show their faces, it means posting photos of children who can’t consent is somehow not a breach of privacy. They only show faces of other people’s children 👍

Jennalong · 21/06/2026 18:26

BillericayDickie · 21/06/2026 18:21

So that people comment on it

Could be !

OP posts:
maxslice · 21/06/2026 18:26

To contradict saying they want privacy. It’s annoying. Either show the children or don’t. Stop this ridiculous half-assery.

ShanghaiDiva · 21/06/2026 18:28

maxslice · 21/06/2026 18:26

To contradict saying they want privacy. It’s annoying. Either show the children or don’t. Stop this ridiculous half-assery.

absolutely!

tinyviolinforme · 21/06/2026 18:29

It’s like a trailer.

Ohpleeeease · 21/06/2026 18:34

Who knows? I would guess it’s a marketing ploy to build curiosity. I don’t see any sign that it’s working, despite the best efforts of the Mail.

jeffgoldblum · 21/06/2026 19:48

Without wishing to sound rude @Jennalong, posting a thread about the Sussex’s children is just not on and will only encourage criticism of the children who don’t deserve it.

ExitPursuedByABare · 21/06/2026 19:50

It’ll be a different matter if they end up sat on Chaz’s knee

AutumnAllTheWay · 21/06/2026 19:50

At the risk of sounding cynical about them, perhaps their son isnt as photogenic as the daughter?

I wouldnt know, I actively avoid their nonsense as requested by them not too long ago

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 19:54

I imagine it’s security, he’s always made a huge thing about what a target he is and how he doesn’t have security so not showing their faces is basic safeguarding against that

BillericayDickie · 21/06/2026 20:03

jeffgoldblum · 21/06/2026 19:48

Without wishing to sound rude @Jennalong, posting a thread about the Sussex’s children is just not on and will only encourage criticism of the children who don’t deserve it.

So agree.
children should be off limits .

jeffgoldblum · 21/06/2026 20:04

BillericayDickie · 21/06/2026 20:03

So agree.
children should be off limits .

I agree fully, all the children should be off limits.

Overtheatlantic · 21/06/2026 20:12

Just leave them alone. Ffs. They left salty island so many years ago because the English bully like no other nation.

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:14

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 19:54

I imagine it’s security, he’s always made a huge thing about what a target he is and how he doesn’t have security so not showing their faces is basic safeguarding against that

So why show them at all??

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 20:15

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:14

So why show them at all??

Well they’re a big part of their life aren’t they?

DappledThings · 21/06/2026 20:17

I know people love to criticise them for every single they do but it's perfectly sensible not to show their children's faces and it's understandable that they want to be like thousands of other parents and share some family photos.

The volume of people on various platforms obsessed with saying the children don't even exist is completely mad.

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:23

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 20:15

Well they’re a big part of their life aren’t they?

But no one else’s? They don’t need to be displayed to the world at large via social media, even with faces covered.
There’s zero reason to do that.

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 20:25

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:23

But no one else’s? They don’t need to be displayed to the world at large via social media, even with faces covered.
There’s zero reason to do that.

Well, you don’t need to argue with me about it, I’m just telling you why they do it. Their social media is for them to do what they like, surely?

noonames · 21/06/2026 20:30

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:23

But no one else’s? They don’t need to be displayed to the world at large via social media, even with faces covered.
There’s zero reason to do that.

Especially when you’re simultaneously telling everyone how harmful it was to grow up in the public eye and warning parents against posting photos of children on social media.

ShanghaiDiva · 21/06/2026 20:32

noonames · 21/06/2026 20:30

Especially when you’re simultaneously telling everyone how harmful it was to grow up in the public eye and warning parents against posting photos of children on social media.

The irony appears to be lost on them.

KilkennyCats · 21/06/2026 20:34

noonames · 21/06/2026 20:30

Especially when you’re simultaneously telling everyone how harmful it was to grow up in the public eye and warning parents against posting photos of children on social media.

Yes, she spends a lot of time on that particular soapbox, doesn’t she?
Do as I say and not as I do.

muddyford · 21/06/2026 20:34

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/06/2026 20:15

Well they’re a big part of their life aren’t they?

Yes, but not the rest of the world's life.

JustSawJohnny · 21/06/2026 20:43

I mean, isn't it obvious?

The hate they've had the last few years?

I wouldn't be surprised if they were getting death threats fairly regularly, the amount of bile people spew about them.

I have family members who won't post face pics of their kids online.

It's really not unusual.

Swipe left for the next trending thread