Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince Harry & Meghan kids

250 replies

Jennalong · 21/06/2026 18:19

There is a photo of Harry with his children with reference to Fathers Day . It shows him cuddling his children , with the girl's face partially shown but the son is turned fully into Harry and you only see the back of his head.
In most photos that they post this is always the case .
Why do they do this ?

OP posts:
LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 15:19

abigailll · 26/06/2026 14:11

Absolutely right - nothing more delicious that watching a pair of grifting, delusional, grandiose, preachy bullies - circling the drain and the world laughing at every clap back, interview, IG post, faux tour - they provide this hilarious content to the world for free. I expect all of their family, friends, colleagues and staff that they have exploited and bullied have some pleasure in the karma.

Ok so basically bullying them back...💁‍♀️ that's what you're basically doing.

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · 26/06/2026 15:22

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 15:19

Ok so basically bullying them back...💁‍♀️ that's what you're basically doing.

So you admit they’ve bullied their families and staff?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 26/06/2026 15:54

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 10:29

Just so its clear since tou call me out specifically, how much have I posted on it? A handful I reckon less than 10 comment in 6 months. Compared to everyone else? That is nothing. Feel free to call out all the other names who clearly are posting far more...

You could say the royals have been equally active but again it doesn't generate the same number of comments.

And we all know why that was! you said yourself you were banned!

bluegreygreen · 26/06/2026 16:54

There are few comments on other members of the Royal Family because there is little to discuss about people doing their job in a professional manner.

At the point where other members decide to air private grievances in public, give interviews with American chat show hosts, publish docuseries and biographies which contain provable lies, and continue with similar endeavours for a further 6 years, I'm sure there will be plenty of threads about them too.

IcedPurple · 26/06/2026 19:05

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 13:48

When its focused on two people it is compared to other royal members who are just as active if not more with their engagements ..noone wants to discuss those? Why cos you can't get a laugh out of it? Not entertaining enough? Making fun of people is what you find entertaining...

Why cos you can't get a laugh out of it? Not entertaining enough? Making fun of people is what you find entertaining...

Yes, yes, and yes.

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · 26/06/2026 19:41

IcedPurple · 26/06/2026 19:05

Why cos you can't get a laugh out of it? Not entertaining enough? Making fun of people is what you find entertaining...

Yes, yes, and yes.

Since this insulting post was originally written to me, please kindly clarify what this reply means?

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 19:51

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · 26/06/2026 19:41

Since this insulting post was originally written to me, please kindly clarify what this reply means?

@IcedPurplewas not insulting you @NotTalkinBoutTheLinen, she was simply saying yes she does to all those things.

IcedPurple · 26/06/2026 20:02

jeffgoldblum · 26/06/2026 19:51

@IcedPurplewas not insulting you @NotTalkinBoutTheLinen, she was simply saying yes she does to all those things.

Yep.

NotTalkinBoutTheLinen · 26/06/2026 20:08

IcedPurple · 26/06/2026 20:02

Yep.

🤣 Whatever floats your boat!

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 23:07

IcedPurple · 26/06/2026 19:05

Why cos you can't get a laugh out of it? Not entertaining enough? Making fun of people is what you find entertaining...

Yes, yes, and yes.

At your honest, I personally wouldn't make fun of people because I find it bullying behaviour.

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:03

I wonder if the purpose of this visit is to beg KC for them to keep their titles and stay in the LoS? It's literally all they have, and being royal is everything to them.
They must be worried about William and what he'll do.

DappledThings · 27/06/2026 12:09

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:03

I wonder if the purpose of this visit is to beg KC for them to keep their titles and stay in the LoS? It's literally all they have, and being royal is everything to them.
They must be worried about William and what he'll do.

Doubt it. Why would W bother with the hassle of removing either of those things? It would take him and his three children all being killed, or all of them remaining unmarried and childless, before the LoS means anything practically.

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:11

DappledThings · 27/06/2026 12:09

Doubt it. Why would W bother with the hassle of removing either of those things? It would take him and his three children all being killed, or all of them remaining unmarried and childless, before the LoS means anything practically.

Yes, I do take your point, but perhaps because he wants to reduce the number of titles and working royals? Maybe because of the behaviour of H&M and how untrustworthy they are?
I don't know, but since AMW, they're probably worried. (Disclaimer; I'm not comparing their behaviour to his)

DappledThings · 27/06/2026 12:32

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:11

Yes, I do take your point, but perhaps because he wants to reduce the number of titles and working royals? Maybe because of the behaviour of H&M and how untrustworthy they are?
I don't know, but since AMW, they're probably worried. (Disclaimer; I'm not comparing their behaviour to his)

Nah. Makes no sense. They've not done anything even vaguely close to justifying the admin burden and public fuss that removing their titles would bring. Far simpler for everyone to just let them continue into obscurity.

Archie and Lily's children won't get titles automatically.

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:38

DappledThings · 27/06/2026 12:32

Nah. Makes no sense. They've not done anything even vaguely close to justifying the admin burden and public fuss that removing their titles would bring. Far simpler for everyone to just let them continue into obscurity.

Archie and Lily's children won't get titles automatically.

Fair enough. They'll do their best to merchandise the titles of their children, I would imagine. Especially Princess Lilibet Diana.
Then, after that, as you say, the titles aren't royal.

abigailll · 27/06/2026 13:46

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 12:38

Fair enough. They'll do their best to merchandise the titles of their children, I would imagine. Especially Princess Lilibet Diana.
Then, after that, as you say, the titles aren't royal.

Good luck with that tho - as they haven’t had any success merching their own titles - so why would anyone be interested in A&L - further away / diluted - no British angle - unless they decide to send them to UK boarding schools to get on the coat tails of their cousins. Maybe they are touring Eton whilst here. I wonder how far they would go for royal adjacency?

jeffgoldblum · 27/06/2026 13:48

abigailll · 27/06/2026 13:46

Good luck with that tho - as they haven’t had any success merching their own titles - so why would anyone be interested in A&L - further away / diluted - no British angle - unless they decide to send them to UK boarding schools to get on the coat tails of their cousins. Maybe they are touring Eton whilst here. I wonder how far they would go for royal adjacency?

How far wouldn’t they go? 😬

IcedPurple · 27/06/2026 16:02

LipglossAndLies · 26/06/2026 23:07

At your honest, I personally wouldn't make fun of people because I find it bullying behaviour.

Knock yourself out.

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 16:10

abigailll · 27/06/2026 13:46

Good luck with that tho - as they haven’t had any success merching their own titles - so why would anyone be interested in A&L - further away / diluted - no British angle - unless they decide to send them to UK boarding schools to get on the coat tails of their cousins. Maybe they are touring Eton whilst here. I wonder how far they would go for royal adjacency?

I saw a rumour that Harry wants them educated in the UK.

NotMyProblemAnymore · 28/06/2026 16:14

Harry has always complained about the lack of privacy that his mother and brother had to endure as a young family.
He and Meghan decided to keep as much distance and visibility of their children from the press/people for as long as possible.
Another believable reason could be that not letting the children's faces be shown would be instrumental in keeping up public interest in the estranged family, and that strategy does appear to be working for them.

RanyaJerodung · 01/07/2026 12:21

NotMyProblemAnymore · 28/06/2026 16:14

Harry has always complained about the lack of privacy that his mother and brother had to endure as a young family.
He and Meghan decided to keep as much distance and visibility of their children from the press/people for as long as possible.
Another believable reason could be that not letting the children's faces be shown would be instrumental in keeping up public interest in the estranged family, and that strategy does appear to be working for them.

They share so much, though. They share details of their lives and their children's lives that are just not necessary. Give those children privacy, don't put them on social media at all. Don't share private moments, don't promote your marriage and your parenting.
That's too much publicity and they are deliberately stoking interest.

abigailll · 01/07/2026 13:02

RanyaJerodung · 27/06/2026 16:10

I saw a rumour that Harry wants them educated in the UK.

And I expect he would want 24/7 armed security for them at school. I suspect there is some trust in place to pay for education which I might want / need to tap into. But MM wouldn’t allow it (don’t blame her) and neither of them value education either

LipglossAndLies · 01/07/2026 14:25

abigailll · 01/07/2026 13:02

And I expect he would want 24/7 armed security for them at school. I suspect there is some trust in place to pay for education which I might want / need to tap into. But MM wouldn’t allow it (don’t blame her) and neither of them value education either

How do they not value education?

NotMyProblemAnymore · 01/07/2026 15:56

That's too much publicity and they are deliberately stoking interest.

I agree, and that's what I suggested too, about not posting photos of their children.

They post about the children, and themselves, on SM because that promotes constant interest in them all.

Not allowing photos creates in some, an intense curiosity to ( eventually) see their faces.

It would be real a security risk to post photos of faces, more so than sharing little details of their lives as they grow up, and of course H&M's parenting style and marriage.
On one hand it seems they want security for their family, and on the other they wish not to be completely forgotten by the public.

RanyaJerodung · 01/07/2026 16:02

NotMyProblemAnymore · 01/07/2026 15:56

That's too much publicity and they are deliberately stoking interest.

I agree, and that's what I suggested too, about not posting photos of their children.

They post about the children, and themselves, on SM because that promotes constant interest in them all.

Not allowing photos creates in some, an intense curiosity to ( eventually) see their faces.

It would be real a security risk to post photos of faces, more so than sharing little details of their lives as they grow up, and of course H&M's parenting style and marriage.
On one hand it seems they want security for their family, and on the other they wish not to be completely forgotten by the public.

I think you can protect your children and not put them on social media, but still promote yourselves? It's tricky though because they're definitely wanting to promote Archie and Lilibet.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread