Please or to access all these features

Politics

What will it take for the Government to enact welfare reform?

1000 replies

Schlossadler · 17/09/2026 16:00

What has to break, before the Government is finally willing to enact welfare reform?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
EasternStandard · 19/09/2026 20:38

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:33

Tell Timms/the DWP that - it’s their words.

The Department for Work and Pensions said: “The Timms Review interim report made clear that Pip is no longer fit for purpose. The recommendations from the final report, due in autumn, will pave the way for sustainable reform.”

Surprised at the remaining love for this Labour Govt…

The last Labour reforms didn’t get through, we’ll see what they propose.

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:38

ThisOldThang · 19/09/2026 20:31

"disabled people have the right to the same standard of living as everyone else"

This isn't a communist country and we accept that people have different standards of living based upon their economic output. I agree with disability payments, but it's ridiculous to claim that disabled people have 'the right' to x standard of living.

They can only have the help and support that the rest of society can afford, and are willing to, pay.

You ought to be thoroughly ashamed of what you just wrote.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:40

@CitationNeededre. Entitlement to same standard of living as everyone else. I think the point is that no-one is entitled to any particular standard of living: their standard of living should align with what they can afford.

the issue is when everyone wants an ever increasingly luxurious standard of living but expects everyone else to pay for it.

That restriction applies to all. Abled and disabled.

hedgeknight · 19/09/2026 20:40

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:30

Feel free to test me. Arrange for me to host a benefits review session for the day and I’ll happy determine who needs support and who doesn’t. If I’m stuck with any cases I’ll stick my hand up. Rest easy I’m confident I’ll get my work done without getting stuck.

You realise you are talking about people here?

And the ones that you 'reject'? Send them to the work house, asylum? Label them subhumans?

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:40

What if you are a median level tax payer? There are people here and in real life that believe that as long as disabled people are fed and housed and have basic needs met they shouldn’t get money for “luxuries” like holidays, social events, hobbies. Being disabled means all of those things are more expensive.

As I said I think lots of people would happily see the workhouses brought back.

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:40

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:23

Where are the child’s parents in the scenario you have given above?

Are you really so naive?

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:41

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:40

What if you are a median level tax payer? There are people here and in real life that believe that as long as disabled people are fed and housed and have basic needs met they shouldn’t get money for “luxuries” like holidays, social events, hobbies. Being disabled means all of those things are more expensive.

As I said I think lots of people would happily see the workhouses brought back.

And are you one of them?

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:41

EasternStandard · 19/09/2026 20:38

The last Labour reforms didn’t get through, we’ll see what they propose.

Yes, doubtless the back bench constituents are already mobilised.

Couple that with another round of tax rises in October, and things could get funky. The taxpayer is at breaking point - when you chuck in the COL, which Labour has failed to address, beyond the 2 quid bus fare cap….

OP posts:
ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:42

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:31

Do you claim it? Do you know it’s quite hard to get? Do you have to regularly fill out forms dehumanising yourself or your child describing in detail the things they cannot do, the ways in which they can’t lead a normal life? Do you know how demoralising that is?

Can I ask what you suggest the alternative is? A blank cheque book?

Taxpayers have a legal right to VfM and ensuring their money is being spent appropriately.

That applies to the disabled who many, to your point, are tax payers also.

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:42

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:40

@CitationNeededre. Entitlement to same standard of living as everyone else. I think the point is that no-one is entitled to any particular standard of living: their standard of living should align with what they can afford.

the issue is when everyone wants an ever increasingly luxurious standard of living but expects everyone else to pay for it.

That restriction applies to all. Abled and disabled.

I’m not talking about 5 star travel. I’m talking about access to normal socialising, a family holiday once a year, a hobby. Surely a disabled person has the right to the same standard of living as someone else who wants the same as them? PIP often provides that.

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:42

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:40

Are you really so naive?

That the best you got?

Come on, you can do better.

OP posts:
Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:43

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:42

Can I ask what you suggest the alternative is? A blank cheque book?

Taxpayers have a legal right to VfM and ensuring their money is being spent appropriately.

That applies to the disabled who many, to your point, are tax payers also.

Yes. And the taxpayer is at liberty to reduce his/her liability.

The government will have to simply suck up lower tax receipts.

OP posts:
dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:44

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:01

For same reason as you did (twice).

No, I was making points relevant to the discussion. You’re really not coming off well on this thread.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:44

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:33

So because you are disabled you can’t have a holiday? Even if you are educated and want well etc? Pay tax?

Now swap that out to being a woman, being black, being gay? Fuck the ableism on here is awful.

Lets go back to the workhouse.

Anyone can have anything (legal) they want if they can afford it. If it’s not affordable, can’t have it. Same concept applies to all

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:45

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 20:42

That the best you got?

Come on, you can do better.

Nice question dodge. Do you really think all children have parents who look after them properly?

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:46

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:41

And are you one of them?

I’m a higher rate tax payer (the 40% bit). I now work full time with a very flexible employer.

I use her DLA for her needs, including more expensive travel, days out, safe foods, replacing clothes that get destroyed more quickly (sensory stuff), therapy etc .

nearlylovemyusername · 19/09/2026 20:46

hedgeknight · 19/09/2026 19:39

Your list seems to target women more than men.

What is going to happen to those people when you take away their benefits?

Only because it's ultimately woman's decision to have a baby or not.

As to those denied benefits - maybe go and do the job which is currently done by imported low skilled labour? Fruit picking? or community services, e.g. cleaning parks?

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:47

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:03

Come on. Are you telling me you think you’d lack the ability to determine someone in genuine need from someone taking the piss?

How do you get through life if you lack such basic critical thinking skills?

also: see previous posts for examples if you’re stuck

OK then. What is your opinion on long Covid, ME and mental health conditions?

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:47

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:38

Safe foods as she is autistic. This often brings ARfid or similar issues with foods due to sensory issues. So she will eat the same food for ages, but omy eat a limited amount of food and then a bad experience of a food will mean she will no longer eat it.

During Covid she was very nearly hospitalised as food shortages in her safe foods. She is much better now, but I know many parents of ARfid children and it can cause a lot of waste and more expensive foods.

Thanks for explaining. I hope she and your family get the support you need for what is clearly a challenging situation

CitationNeeded · 19/09/2026 20:47

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:44

Anyone can have anything (legal) they want if they can afford it. If it’s not affordable, can’t have it. Same concept applies to all

But they can’t afford it because they are disabled! So we exclude them from life because of that. Now apply that to women, gay people, black people.

Disabled people have the right to live the same as others. If life is 25% more expensive for disabled people you are saying it’s acceptable for them to earn the same as an able bodied person l, pay the same tax, but live less of a a life.

hedgeknight · 19/09/2026 20:49

nearlylovemyusername · 19/09/2026 20:46

Only because it's ultimately woman's decision to have a baby or not.

As to those denied benefits - maybe go and do the job which is currently done by imported low skilled labour? Fruit picking? or community services, e.g. cleaning parks?

Only women can get pregnant and being punished for it.

Will they get payed a proper wage for those jobs?

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:49

hedgeknight · 19/09/2026 20:40

You realise you are talking about people here?

And the ones that you 'reject'? Send them to the work house, asylum? Label them subhumans?

See previous posts re. the options they have.

Differentforgirls · 19/09/2026 20:50

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:00

It’s be peculiar for them to need to be in 12 hours a day. We both work demanding professional roles including travel, have no family support around (as we moved to find work), and my children aren’t in nursery for 12 hours a day.

5 days a week yes, 12 hours a day no.

and do you know what part of my drive to rationalise our welfare spend is about? It’s because I’d love to see my children more but instead of being able to reduce my hours, I’m having to work so that others can sit on their arse with their kids whilst shouting “tax the rich”.

I job shared when mine were wee. I can assure you that I wasn’t “sitting on my arse”.

Best days of my life. Skint but every day was a laugh.

NorthXNorthWest · 19/09/2026 20:51

Schlossadler · 19/09/2026 19:07

It is statistically dubious to have nearly 1 in 5 of the adults in an area on PiP - you agree, I hope.

I might agree with your fraud assertion if there weren’t numerous YouTube and Tictok videos on what to say at your GP and PIP assessment.

I suspect that for a significant number of people the benefit system has become their skill set. It has broken any link for them between productive activity & money. Until this is addressed, it will continue to get slowly worse.

There are real limitations in how accurate the fraud figure is. Our systems don't necessarily communicate with each other like they do in Denmark. So getting an accurate picture of the real scale is difficult. The figures quoted are best guess, at best.

ExpectMore · 19/09/2026 20:51

dreamiesformolly · 19/09/2026 20:38

You ought to be thoroughly ashamed of what you just wrote.

Why? Can you explain please?

it’s easy to promise everyone the world until you have to consider how to pay for it

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread