Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Oscar Pistorius trial part 4

987 replies

Pennies · 15/04/2014 09:53

Here you go.

OP posts:
StackALee · 17/04/2014 10:05

I do hope this bloke is OK after all this, it can't be great being shown to be quite incompetent (At least in the tasks he was set) on a world wide stage :(

member · 17/04/2014 10:06

For a scientist, his methodology (and the documentation of such) is appalling.

FreeLikeABird · 17/04/2014 10:08

Oh dear Shock I feel awful for mr Dixon now, this is painful to listen too.

Nerf · 17/04/2014 10:09

I don't know if this is acceptable practice. It doesn't feel like it.
Unless OP has bought the judge off he must be terrified his case is over!

Roussette · 17/04/2014 10:10

Bloody hell. Mr. Dixon is saying he doesn't read newspapers, online news, doesn't have a TV, his excuse for not knowing about curtains opened and closed.

Yet he goes on twitter and facebook and posts about the trial on there.

He is really clutching at straws now and is making a complete fool of himself.

LouiseBrooks · 17/04/2014 10:11

I am not only appalled but also gobsmacked at the defence. Surely it would have been better not to have had Dixon testify at all and rely on the evidence of the other neighbours etc?

I'm still also wondering just how competent Dixon was considered when working for the State?

member · 17/04/2014 10:11

And don't forget searching for gunshot sounds on the internet ...

HowAboutNo · 17/04/2014 10:13

Money well spent, Pistorius. Painful.

StackALee · 17/04/2014 10:14

does he mean 22 feb 2013 or 2014?

noddyholder · 17/04/2014 10:14

The moon?

FreeLikeABird · 17/04/2014 10:15

This is just shocking, I can't believe they have paid and brought this man to stand in the box, I seriously think I would rather not have anyone, it's embarrassing, it needs to just stop now!

Roussette · 17/04/2014 10:16

He had done some light tests at the house prior to this but went and had the bloke kneeling to recreate OP at the window on 14th April this year. That's 3 days ago. Nel double checked the date and that's what he said.

FreeLikeABird · 17/04/2014 10:16

He used a man approx 20cm shorted than OP on his stumps, he didn't test the light in the bedroom with curtains not only closed but open, he did not see how much light came in with balcony light on Shock even OP said the balcony light was on, oh dear and on and on we go.....

Nerf · 17/04/2014 10:17

He's also just said he could see the outline if the bookcase in the passage way, hmm.

Nerf · 17/04/2014 10:18

And several led lights not just one

member · 17/04/2014 10:20

For a man not following the trial, he's retweeted quite a few comments on it

twitter.com/SunsetClivia

StackALee · 17/04/2014 10:35

OH DEAR. Even the Judge has taken pity on him.

Roussette · 17/04/2014 10:36

His tweets sound like he is absolutely desperate for work. I wonder if this has any bearing on this complete nightmare - perhaps he talked himself into this job. and is now very much regretting that

member · 17/04/2014 10:40

What happened Stack - missed the resumption of court?

Don't think Roux will do much in re-exam - this witness beyond redemption

AmIthatSpringy · 17/04/2014 10:40

Wow, I'm home now, so going to watch, is it really as bad as everyone's saying?

member · 17/04/2014 10:43

Yes AmI, it is painful - keep expecting Roux or the judge to stand Dixon down.

msrisotto · 17/04/2014 10:44

expert witness work does pay handsomely

Roussette · 17/04/2014 10:47

AmI this tweet just about sums it up -

andrew harding@BBCAndrewH
Nel, like a man whose opponent has brought a comb to a knife fight, continues to jab at his qualifications and credibility. #OscarPistorius

AmIthatSpringy · 17/04/2014 10:50

Why would such an experienced defence counsel allow a witness of that calibre.

It defies belief

shoppingbagsundereyes · 17/04/2014 10:55

Because all other experts found evidence to support the prosecution IMO. I reckon this guy was paid to lie because they couldn't find anyone to back up their argument. Such a foolish strategy though. Someone a year ago should have had the guts to tell this rich and famous man that he was going to have to tell the truth. Seems to me they've been happy to take his money and work on this nonsensical 'defence'.
I will be gobsmacked if he doesn't go to prison for a long time.

Swipe left for the next trending thread