@Hadmysay
Supposing somewhere in your arguments there’s a grain of truth. Suppose that a significant number of men are so physically, intellectually, ethically and morally weak and religiously deficient as to be unable to control their urges and desires and prioritise what is right.
Your ‘solution’ is to require women and girls to modify their dress and behaviour presumably. But why? Ask yourself if that’s because deep inside you think that women are less important - that they have a responsibility to accomodate men first - that they are just ‘support’ persons, rather than human beings with rights of their own.
The females aren’t hurting anyone else - why should they be the ones to change/ be restricted? They aren’t the ones going round shouting abusive comments at males, spitting or hissing at them, making assumptions about them based on the colour of their skins or ethnic or religious affiliations, or age or sexually assaulting or raping. They are not ‘causing’ crime.
Ask yourself why you are not suggesting heavy policing and criminal penalties for men including the banning of porn etc, possibly a curfew at night. Why are extreme religious regimes not controlling male movement and freedom to abuse/ rape? Where are the men being taught not to ogle women, to treat them with respect, or being blinded or castrated for sexual harassment and abuse, instead of the women being raped, whipped and stoned?