Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to not let my husbands family meet my newborn baby despite letting my family meet the baby?

1000 replies

hello1999 · 24/07/2026 21:46

This post is going to be short as I gave birth 2 days ago and I'm exhausted 😅. We got home from the hospital this morning, I had a few complications during birth so they kept me at the hospital overnight. But my daughter is healthy and she is perfect.

My family came to visit at the hospital yesterday. My parents, my older brother and my older sister all came to visit. I didn't mind them being there, we are a close family so I wasn't bothered by them visiting. My mum and dad are staying with me and my husband for another 2 weeks to help us. And my siblings visited my house today, they stayed for dinner, and it was nice to chat to them without worrying about the fact I feel awful right now. However, I have asked my husbands parents and his siblings to wait a week before visiting us. Mainly because I don't feel comfortable being around people who aren't my close family whilst I am still in pain and adjusting to motherhood. I need a week to atleast figure out my routine.

My husband has no issue with this but my mother in law and my sister in law have sent multiple texts telling me that I am being selfish. They said that the baby is their family too so they should be able to meet the baby at the same time as my family. Apparently my pain can't be "bad enough" to stop me from having visitors over. According to my mother in law, back in her day, people gave birth and just got on with life. No fuss.

AIBU?

Sorry this post is short and might be lacking context. I am so tired.

OP posts:
PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:16

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:14

I have said they shouldn't have sent the texts they did, but they wouldn't have been upset if OP hadn't excluded them and treated them differently to her own parents.

Hopefully OP doesn't ever expect her in-laws to come and help her out when her own family are busy or unavailable.

I doubt she wants anything to do with them after the way they treated her in pregnancy and after just giving birth. The ILs have made their bed.

PrettyLittleRose · Yesterday 11:16

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:10

I'm a mother of a son. I think she is being reasonable. I can't fathom the mindset of her in laws demanding they get to see the baby after 2 days and taking umbrage at being asked to wait a few days.

Good for you if you would allegedly be 'fine with it.' But the OP's family have been allowed to see the baby. It's only her IN-LAWS (her husband's family,) who have been told NO.

I don't believe ANYone would be OK with this. Being treated like they're third rate, like they don't matter.

I am also guessing your son has no children, and you have never been pushed out in favour of your daughter-in-law's family. Wait til it happens to you.Wink

MustardGlass · Yesterday 11:17

You might not think it’s offensive to treat your in-laws so differently to your parents but I guarantee your in-laws will still be offended. I would be.

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:20

MysticChevron · Yesterday 11:15

The child will still be around in a week. The ILs not seeing the baby til then doesn’t mean they aren’t part of the baby’s life. Also, the father has already made it clear he supports and understands OPs decision. And at this stage, it kind of is all about the OP. She’s carried and birthed the child. More power to her!

Power. Exactly that. One big power trip.

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:21

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:16

I doubt she wants anything to do with them after the way they treated her in pregnancy and after just giving birth. The ILs have made their bed.

OP started it by excluding them and shutting them out, while happily hosting her own family for dinners.

MysticChevron · Yesterday 11:21

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:20

Power. Exactly that. One big power trip.

Best pop back to the Sea, Bubbles. You’ve jumped the shark with that one 🦈

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:22

PrettyLittleRose · Yesterday 11:16

Good for you if you would allegedly be 'fine with it.' But the OP's family have been allowed to see the baby. It's only her IN-LAWS (her husband's family,) who have been told NO.

I don't believe ANYone would be OK with this. Being treated like they're third rate, like they don't matter.

I am also guessing your son has no children, and you have never been pushed out in favour of your daughter-in-law's family. Wait til it happens to you.Wink

The mil has been asked to wait one week. She has not been pushed out.

I am confident, because I am not insecure, self centred and selfish, that I can understand that in these early days my hypothetical daughter in law will want her own family, whom she has known all her life, around her and that they and my hypothetical daughter in law's wishes, are more important than me.

Nottodaythankyou123 · Yesterday 11:22

thatgreenjuniper · Yesterday 11:01

Inviting them to visit after a few days is NOT excluding them

Reasonable and normal grand-parents would be looking forward to meet the baby, happy for the couple, and absolutely fine with letting the family chill for a couple of days.

Not going on a raging fit because they don't have their way and they don't have priority over the woman who actually gave birth!

I completely understand a “no visitor” ban for a week, wouldn’t have been my choice but I can see why people do. I do think it’s disingenuous thought to pretend that allowing one set of grandparents to not only visit, but to live there for two weeks, whilst not allowing the other even a cursory hello, isnt unfair and unkind.

OP is completely free to make whatever choice she feels works best, but there will be a knock on effect in the future based on that choice.

Purplecatshopaholic · Yesterday 11:22

Hmm, a bit to unpick here. At the end of the day, you are entitled to your views op, and can have people visiting when you feel ready. However, your ILs have the right to feel aggrieved and upset that they have been treated differently. They defo do not have the right to send rude texts, and should have kept quiet. But you are hosting your family while excluding his. This is unfair - surely having them popping round and keeping it short could have been accommodated to help smooth future relationships. The reality here is this doesn’t bode well, and will likely cause rifts and unpleasantness going forward. That is just something you and your DH will need to deal with going forward op.

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:23

MysticChevron · Yesterday 11:21

Best pop back to the Sea, Bubbles. You’ve jumped the shark with that one 🦈

Wow bravo. That gets a slow clap.

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:24

Notmycircusnotmyotter · Yesterday 11:07

The OP is more important than the ILs. She's just given birth FFS. Her wishes matter!

She isn't more important.

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:24

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:04

It's not about having priority. It's about them being treated the same as the other set of grandparents. If OP can host her family for dinner she can have her in-laws over for a couple of hours to meet their grandchild.

They're reacting the way they are because they're being pushed out and treated differently. They're hurt, and understandably so.

I just can't imagine being so emotionally imature and childish that I needed to be treated 'the same' as the other set of grandparents. This is a real life baby, not a toy. Any grandparent who started being possessive of my newborn like this would be seeing them less, not more. The ILs strategy is going to back fire big time. After this carry on I doubt the parents will want them to be a big part of their DC's life. Have they actually done anything to support the new parents? Or just sent nasty messages to the new mother and had a tantrum about their 'rights'?

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:26

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:24

She isn't more important.

Of course the OP is.

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:26

Seabubbles · Yesterday 11:24

She isn't more important.

Ask the baby. She doesn't give a fuck about these grandparents, she just wants her mum. The one these ILs have been sending nasty messages to.

sittingonabeach · Yesterday 11:27

I would respect a DIL’s wishes after having a baby so wouldn’t barge in or send abusive texts, but I would feel hurt if all her family were able to be around and I couldn’t even have one cuddle.

The OP doesn’t even have to see the in-laws if she doesn’t want to. She has 5 other people around who can support her whilst visit is taking place, sort the house out etc. DH can manage his mum and if she becomes overbearing, rude etc usher her out and tell her that behaviour is not acceptable and will limit her time with grandchild

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:27

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:24

I just can't imagine being so emotionally imature and childish that I needed to be treated 'the same' as the other set of grandparents. This is a real life baby, not a toy. Any grandparent who started being possessive of my newborn like this would be seeing them less, not more. The ILs strategy is going to back fire big time. After this carry on I doubt the parents will want them to be a big part of their DC's life. Have they actually done anything to support the new parents? Or just sent nasty messages to the new mother and had a tantrum about their 'rights'?

I just can't imagine being so emotionally imature and childish that I needed to be treated 'the same' as the other set of grandparents. This is a real life baby, not a toy.

Same.

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:27

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:24

I just can't imagine being so emotionally imature and childish that I needed to be treated 'the same' as the other set of grandparents. This is a real life baby, not a toy. Any grandparent who started being possessive of my newborn like this would be seeing them less, not more. The ILs strategy is going to back fire big time. After this carry on I doubt the parents will want them to be a big part of their DC's life. Have they actually done anything to support the new parents? Or just sent nasty messages to the new mother and had a tantrum about their 'rights'?

It's not being emotionally immature to want to meet your grandchild, ffs. Besides, if OP had just allowed her in-laws to meet her baby in the first place, she wouldn't be in this situation.

Oh, and how can they "support the new parents" when they aren't even allowed to meet their own son's newborn baby? Confused

sittingonabeach · Yesterday 11:29

Are they allowed a look in to support the new parents. The other grandma has said no to visitors. What can they do?

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:30

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:27

It's not being emotionally immature to want to meet your grandchild, ffs. Besides, if OP had just allowed her in-laws to meet her baby in the first place, she wouldn't be in this situation.

Oh, and how can they "support the new parents" when they aren't even allowed to meet their own son's newborn baby? Confused

It's emotionally immature to not understand why OP might only want her family around at this stage.

Dhejeje · Yesterday 11:30

How entitled are the OPs family to think a new father wants to spend a fortnight hosting his ILs

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:30

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:21

OP started it by excluding them and shutting them out, while happily hosting her own family for dinners.

'Started it'...again just so childish. And the ILs hardly have grounds for claiming that after how they treated OP in pregnancy. But they can carry on with their childish tantrums if they like, they will be the only ones losing out.

BiteSizedLife · Yesterday 11:31

EverytimeItPours · Yesterday 10:58

Op why did you start this thread? The overwhelming majority of people have told you that you’re being unreasonable (most have told you kindly) but you’re just doubling down and insisting that you’re right.

I know! How embarassing

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:33

PhaedraTwo · Yesterday 11:30

It's emotionally immature to not understand why OP might only want her family around at this stage.

But it's not emotionally immature to exclude the entirety of your husbands' family? Give me strength.

vegemitesandwiches · Yesterday 11:33

PeachesxBDA · Yesterday 11:30

'Started it'...again just so childish. And the ILs hardly have grounds for claiming that after how they treated OP in pregnancy. But they can carry on with their childish tantrums if they like, they will be the only ones losing out.

The baby will also be losing out.

Topjoe19 · Yesterday 11:34

OP I'm no fan of my in-laws but I do think YABU. They are family to my children and despite any issues I may have had with them, I support them having a relationship with the DC. It's important to me that my children have as wide a family as possible.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread