Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Taylor Swift is a big meanie for not releasing just 1 photo of her in her wedding dress?

158 replies

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 21:01

Before anyone says "maybe she just wants to keep her entire wedding - including dress - private"...

  1. She's made her whole career about her personal life

  2. Her fans are often young girls who idolise her. (I have 2 nieces age 10 and 12 who are really disappointed they have seen nothing).

  3. Said fans have made her a billionaire and essentially therefore paid for the huge wedding!

  4. It's been over 2 weeks since said wedding so plenty of time for her to have relaxed afterwards and then selected a single sodding photo to release

  5. It's not like she needs to sell the photos for money

I think it's quite mean of her tbh. It would be less bad if she TOLD these young fans either "you will see the dress in my forthcoming documentary" or "I've decided to keep it private". At lease then they would know.

Signed

A 43 year old woman who no longer believes in romantic love but remembers what it was like to be 10-12 years old and fascinated by weddings and wedding dresses.

OP posts:
Rondayvu · 19/07/2026 21:57

Why on earth would anyone want to be famous when the pressure of even a wedding photo cannot be allowed to be released more than three seconds after the vows. Honestly I hope she never releases one, she owes nobody a thing and deserves some privacy for once.

madaboutpurple · 19/07/2026 21:58

Maybe a magazine did a deal.

Empress13 · 19/07/2026 22:03

I heard somewhere she’s currently on her honeymoon and will release photos / photo afterwards. I’m guessing it will be a magazine deal hence why guests are always required to not take their phones in for photos

chillyputsomesockson · 19/07/2026 22:07

They will be having a honeymoon and taking some time for themselves as newlyweds I would think. I don’t think they’re being unreasonable at all. She will definitely release photos, but she’ll want to choose exactly what to release and how. I’m sure she’ll do that after their honeymoon.
Her real fans will know this and understand that they will get something fabulous as a release when she is ready.
This isn’t an album/concert/new music, the fans are not entitled, as pp have said , the fans need to understand that she’s having a personal life and she will let them into it when she’s ready.
She didn’t announce the engagement immediately either .

NewGoldFox · 19/07/2026 22:12

Surely the damage she does to the environment with her endless private jet use is worse?..

Monstershark · 19/07/2026 22:18

She probably doesn't want people criticising her dress choice and look. It's inevitable that some people love to tear others down and she doesn't want that about her wedding .

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:25

William & Catherine released official portraits within HOURS of their wedding. Sounds like they didn't bother with much editing!

OP posts:
WhatAMarvelousTune · 19/07/2026 22:27

This sort of thing (plus the drone shots of her at a friend’s wedding last week) is presumably why they felt like they had to get married at MSG.

Why is a 10 yr old obsessing over a celebrity’s wedding dress???

However - a picture will be released, a Dior spokesperson (it was a Dior dress) said so and I imagine they weren’t just guessing.

WhatAMarvelousTune · 19/07/2026 22:28

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:25

William & Catherine released official portraits within HOURS of their wedding. Sounds like they didn't bother with much editing!

That wedding was broadcast live around the world!

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:29

Out of 160 votes, 1/3 of you agree with me. As usual, the comments do not reflect the poll!

I think it's a bit like the thread about "what did you think was a common courtesy but apparently isn't" or whatever it was. Like I'm not saying she OFFICIALLY OWES US a photo just that it would be the DECENT thing to do.

Like if you do someone a big favour, you're not OWED a card and flowers (or whatever) but it would be a POLITE THING TO DO. And although the driver legally has to let you across the pedestrian crossing, it's decent to acknowledge that.

OP posts:
Empress13 · 19/07/2026 22:29

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:25

William & Catherine released official portraits within HOURS of their wedding. Sounds like they didn't bother with much editing!

Yes but being royalty is a different kettle of fish to being a pop star

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:31

@Empress13 correct. It's much more important, as a historical event. So if anyone was going to take extra care over the photos released, it should be the future King & Queen, not a pop star.

Anyway, I'm not comparing the weddings and whether they were broadcast or not (relevance?) Just how much editing was done/how long it took on on the wedding photo portraits.

OP posts:
plims · 19/07/2026 22:31

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:29

Out of 160 votes, 1/3 of you agree with me. As usual, the comments do not reflect the poll!

I think it's a bit like the thread about "what did you think was a common courtesy but apparently isn't" or whatever it was. Like I'm not saying she OFFICIALLY OWES US a photo just that it would be the DECENT thing to do.

Like if you do someone a big favour, you're not OWED a card and flowers (or whatever) but it would be a POLITE THING TO DO. And although the driver legally has to let you across the pedestrian crossing, it's decent to acknowledge that.

How has your ‘niece’ done Taylor Swift a favour?

Empress13 · 19/07/2026 22:31

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:25

William & Catherine released official portraits within HOURS of their wedding. Sounds like they didn't bother with much editing!

The whole world saw the dress the
minute she got out the car !

BennyHenny · 19/07/2026 22:32

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:29

Out of 160 votes, 1/3 of you agree with me. As usual, the comments do not reflect the poll!

I think it's a bit like the thread about "what did you think was a common courtesy but apparently isn't" or whatever it was. Like I'm not saying she OFFICIALLY OWES US a photo just that it would be the DECENT thing to do.

Like if you do someone a big favour, you're not OWED a card and flowers (or whatever) but it would be a POLITE THING TO DO. And although the driver legally has to let you across the pedestrian crossing, it's decent to acknowledge that.

Have you taken a step back and LOOKED at yourself? You are a grown adult grumping because someone wishes to keep something private for longer than a fortnight, it’s actually really sad that it bothers you so much.

WhatAMarvelousTune · 19/07/2026 22:34

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:31

@Empress13 correct. It's much more important, as a historical event. So if anyone was going to take extra care over the photos released, it should be the future King & Queen, not a pop star.

Anyway, I'm not comparing the weddings and whether they were broadcast or not (relevance?) Just how much editing was done/how long it took on on the wedding photo portraits.

I mentioned the fact it was broadcast because that meant everyone had already seen all the outfits - it was a live public event, not a private event. So pictures from it straight away made sense. They’d probably prefer the official pictures used in reporting, rather than screenshots of the ceremony, or paparazzi outside the cathedral.

Taylor Swift may well want to have a bit more time before half the internet starts slagging off how she looked.

plims · 19/07/2026 22:35

I genuinely don’t understand how a grown adult can get so upset about not seeing a pop stars wedding photos. It’s weirdly immature

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:36

It's really not that serious. They will almost inevitably get divorced so my fucks are limited. Also this is just MN, not Newsnight, it's you lot who are taking it all too seriously. I'm just bored whilst the TV is commandeered with the World Cup in this house.

I'm not usually one to indulge children but on this particular occasion I think Taylor is being a big meanie. One quick snap should have been released the day after.

Anyway thanks for your thoughts, let's all move on and maybe everyone will have lost interest by the time she does deign to show us the dress.

OP posts:
murasaki · 19/07/2026 22:37

If kids are upset that celebrities don't care about them enough to put out a wedding photo, their parents need to do better. How utterly insane.

plims · 19/07/2026 22:39

I agree with you that it’s not that serious. Which is why I don’t understand why you’re so upset that you haven’t seen her dress.

Dontgetstuckinthepast · 19/07/2026 22:40

I think we'll get a photo eventually. I'm sure a Dior spokesperson suggested so.

But if T&T want to keep it all private then fair play to them. It was their big day and choosing private MSG seems to have paid off beautifully.

pinck · 19/07/2026 22:41

ThereWeAreThensmileyface · 19/07/2026 21:09

Photography isn't just a point and shoot job I'm afraid.

The photographer will take photos and then has the after-event job of processing them before presenting them to the client.

This processing can take a considerable amount of time.
Of course, a few select prior peek look book images can be given as first glance - but ultimately at the end of the day its T&Ts perogative as to if and when they release that first image to the press & public.
Bottom line @GallopingConsumption - we will all have to wait, we are low on the list of their priorities ...

Lol, what? Have you ever actually been married or dealt with a wedding photographer? Most brides receive teaser images within days, sometimes even the same day. Photography is not “point and shoot,” obviously, but nobody suggested the full gallery should already be finished. Producing one polished preview photo does not require the photographer to disappear into a candlelit editing crypt for six weeks.

pinck · 19/07/2026 22:45

GeorgeMichaelsCat · 19/07/2026 21:10

It will come. Just be patient.

I genuinely don’t think it will. She announced the engagement, publicized the entire fucking MSG debacle, and has spent years turning her private life into a carefully scheduled marketing campaign, but now everyone is apparently supposed to pretend the wedding is sacred classified information because Princess Taylor has decided nobody may know anything.

mumumental · 19/07/2026 22:47

its all just marketing.

TheChosenTwo · 19/07/2026 22:47

GallopingConsumption · 19/07/2026 22:36

It's really not that serious. They will almost inevitably get divorced so my fucks are limited. Also this is just MN, not Newsnight, it's you lot who are taking it all too seriously. I'm just bored whilst the TV is commandeered with the World Cup in this house.

I'm not usually one to indulge children but on this particular occasion I think Taylor is being a big meanie. One quick snap should have been released the day after.

Anyway thanks for your thoughts, let's all move on and maybe everyone will have lost interest by the time she does deign to show us the dress.

I’m not even interested before she’s shown anyone a photo of her dress, I didn’t even know she got married 😂😂

but sure, it’s us that are taking this too seriously! Honestly op, this thread has given me quite the laugh!

Swipe left for the next trending thread