Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How to leave DP when I’m a SAHM.

1000 replies

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 11:17

SAHM. Two children under the age of 5.

My partner does nothing other than work and pay for everything.

I do 100% of the childcare and housework, even at weekends. Anytime I ask for help with anything around the house, it’s met with huffing and puffing and although it’s never been said out loud, I know he expects that this is my job as he goes to work. I genuinely mean that I do 100% of everything house and child related.

I am completely fed up of this.

I had our first DC right after finishing university (there is an 19 year age gap between us). Unfortunately I am no longer qualified to go back into what I trained as, and would need to start back from the beginning with a new career. However I have no time to train in anything as I do 100% of the childcare. DP will not pay for any childcare nor would he reduce his house to help with this.

I would like to make a plan to leave but I’m stuck. We are not married. Looking for ideas and advice on my next steps.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:02

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 14:05

I'm sorry this won't please you, but I do. He thinks that's what you agreed to. He thinks that what SAHM means.

It's exactly what SAHM meant when I was growing up with a SAHM and it works well for many couples, especially when the kids are in school.

It sounds like it's you that's changing the agreement, not him.

Edited

Do you genuinely think it’s ok that at the weekend, when we’re both in the house, that I am still expected to do every single thing that is required around the house and with the children? Really?

OP posts:
JHound · 18/07/2026 20:02

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 18/07/2026 15:30

He does that during his working day, which he finishes and then comes home to relax. He’ll have a pension. He has valuable assets. He can take a sick day if he needs to. He can take annual leave if he wants to. His time is completely his own. His money is his own. He controls the bills. He controls the money for the shopping. He has a younger woman to have sex with and to raise his children for him. He comes home to a clean and tidy house. She does everything but wipe his arse for him.

She works from the minute she wakes up, to the minute she goes to bed, and as she has two under five, I’m guessing there’s the odd occasion where she’s up in the night with them too. That’s seven days a week, 365 days a year. She has no pension. No contributions to her NI. She has no access to money to spend on whatever she wants. No sick days. No annual leave. No weekends. She has less rights than a lodger. He could throw her out at 3am and there’d be nothing she could do.

He’s not asking her to do her share, which would be entirely reasonable. He’s organised it so she’s in indentured servitude. And once the children no longer need caring for, and if he decides to trade her in for a younger model, she’ll be unemployable, homeless and won’t even qualify for a state pension.

Do you think that’s fair? Do you think each of them is contributing equally to the relationship?

Applause

LiveLuvLaugh · 18/07/2026 20:03

Lifevans · 18/07/2026 11:24

Have you any family?
Whose idea was it to have a family?
Do you feel controlled, targeted?
Do you feel you have free will in all of this?
Do you know what Coercive control is?
Read up about it.

Reach out to family and Women's aid or Domestic abuse charities near you for advice and help.

Did you want children this young, if so, why?

OP was a 21 year old graduate, who chose, in 2021, to have children, become a STAH mum with a rich property owning man 20 years her senior , instead of getting a job. Why are you assuming she’s a victim?

JHound · 18/07/2026 20:06

RedRock41 · 18/07/2026 15:40

Pointing out the unfairness and vulnerability of OPs position.

Her DP is a high earner. He will live a comfortable life whatever happens. OP doesn’t want to work at the moment but also doesn’t want to do 100% childcare.

Hard to square that conundrum whether she leaves or whether she stays which is up to OP.

Benefits are meant to be a hand up not a hammock or hand out and sorry but it does grate that the general tax payer will (and not OPs fault) have to potentially pay to support another high earner’s offspring whilst he pays only CMS… especially as issue seems to be he’s not stepping up as a partner or father.

Only one that ‘wins’ be DP in time and £ resource. Not fair on OP or DC either. Appreciate those are the rules but do think unmarried if they have children should have more rights/security.

Plus when she works, OP still be lions share carer and own breadwinner.

Edited

But she will have less resentment and will not have to perform any emotional labour for her indentured labour contract holder husband.

She will likely have more time for her self too.

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:08

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 18/07/2026 14:26

She probably does. The two children under five aren’t operating them though, are they? Is she supposed to just put them in a cupboard until she’s cleaned and tidied the entire house, done the laundry, cut the grass, done the shopping, organised dinner etc? Or just work til midnight each day so she can fit in enriching her children’s lives as well? When is her time to relax?

And he earns 14k a month because he owns the company. That doesn’t mean he’s doing backbreaking work each day. He could just as easily be sat in a swivel chair, taking the odd phone call, going out to lunch and having adult conversations while she’s up to her elbows in toddler deitrus. Hardly the same thing.

Yes this is more like his average day. He plays a lot of golf too.

OP posts:
Whatswrongherethen · 18/07/2026 20:09

Diamond7272 · 18/07/2026 19:58

When he started paying a 20 year mortgage for his home, she wasn't yet in primary school, she was barely even born...

Yet she should have half the house after knowing him 5yrs??? Nuts!!!!

They're supposed to be a family. It's a family home. It's not his. It's theirs. That's the whole point. I reckon people like you will never ever get the difference. I've known men like you. They end up alone because they cannot get to grips with the idea that family means no more my assets/ your assets. Family means having a joint vision and working towards it as a partnership with whatever resources you both have. Honestly, it's not easy. We've had ups and downs - better and worse - largely because of health scares. But however hard it is, it's absolutely impossible without a joint vision. If it's one person pitted against another. One with the power the other with no choice, then actually it's not going to work for either.

Marieb19 · 18/07/2026 20:09

TBF, when I was a SHM my husband did very around the house and I wouldn't expect him to. You've signed up for an affluent life style but you have little protection. Would your partner go for counseling or pay for help sk you coukd update your professional qualifications? Decide what you want but be prepared that life is unlikely to get easier but if you decide to leave, you can become your own person.

Whatswrongherethen · 18/07/2026 20:09

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:08

Yes this is more like his average day. He plays a lot of golf too.

Of course he plays golf. Of course he does.

JHound · 18/07/2026 20:10

Diamond7272 · 18/07/2026 19:54

She's never had a commute.

Never had a boss.

Never faced redundancy, restructuring, disciplining at work.

Jesus....

She's hardly being abused!!!!! Sheltered more like.

When did women trot out this word 'abuse' in the context of choices so often??????

She saw his life at 20years old, went "ill have a bit of that!" and the rest is history.... 5 years history, so in the scheme of things not much history or 'abuse'...

For women genuinely being abused, beaten, frightened, this thread is laughable...

She has no access to income and no say in how the money in their relationship is spent. That’s textbook financial abuse.

LiveLuvLaugh · 18/07/2026 20:10

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:02

Do you genuinely think it’s ok that at the weekend, when we’re both in the house, that I am still expected to do every single thing that is required around the house and with the children? Really?

No, but I know SAHMs whose partner’s expected that (I’ve known Mums who work part time who take most of the weekend load too, and serious conversations had to be had - full time working Dads often feel entitled to pursue their own interests at weekends - for some reason it’s often cycling). He is being completely unreasonable to expect you to have no downtime.

JHound · 18/07/2026 20:11

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 19:55

If he leaves her tomorrow she would be supported by you and me.

It is only if she leaves him that she has a big problem.

??? She would be in the same position if he leaves or she leaves.

Shinyandnew1 · 18/07/2026 20:12

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:02

Do you genuinely think it’s ok that at the weekend, when we’re both in the house, that I am still expected to do every single thing that is required around the house and with the children? Really?

I’m not the pp, but no, I don’t think that’s ok-but you did choose to have two children with this man.

There have been a lot of replies now. Have you thought about some of the suggestions made?

OneLimePombear · 18/07/2026 20:14

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 20:08

Yes this is more like his average day. He plays a lot of golf too.

You should be more concerned about being in a really financially vulnerable position than him not doing the hoovering.

hellisemptyandallthedevilsarehere · 18/07/2026 20:14

Sadly you sound like his mistress with kids. Will he pay you off generously? Why has he never offered marriage- or if he has, why haven’t you gotten married?

laurini · 18/07/2026 20:16

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 14:05

I'm sorry this won't please you, but I do. He thinks that's what you agreed to. He thinks that what SAHM means.

It's exactly what SAHM meant when I was growing up with a SAHM and it works well for many couples, especially when the kids are in school.

It sounds like it's you that's changing the agreement, not him.

Edited

Lol you have a low bar. Im a SAHM while my husband is at work, but in evenings and on weekends, we share everything.

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 20:17

JHound · 18/07/2026 20:11

??? She would be in the same position if he leaves or she leaves.

No she wouldn't. If she voluntarily makes herself homeless there will be a period which she has no money to cover before benefits kick in. If he hires a nanny and housekeeper in that time she's fucked.

Cheeseandolivesplease · 18/07/2026 20:17

@laurini Are your children at home with you in the day? Then fair enough.

Whatswrongherethen · 18/07/2026 20:19

LiveLuvLaugh · 18/07/2026 20:10

No, but I know SAHMs whose partner’s expected that (I’ve known Mums who work part time who take most of the weekend load too, and serious conversations had to be had - full time working Dads often feel entitled to pursue their own interests at weekends - for some reason it’s often cycling). He is being completely unreasonable to expect you to have no downtime.

Yup I've known these men too. To be honest, on some level I feel sorry for them. They have no real relationship..... Their partners resent them and their kids don't know them
They think their golf/cycling buddies respect them, but actually they don't give a shit about each other. The men like this I've known have ended up isolated and alone ultimately. A number of them separate when the kids are older (as spouse resented them for years). It's when it comes to grandchildren you see how alone they are. They go after a relationship with their kids in order to try and connect with the grandkids, but their children have none of it. Sometimes they marry again, but those relationships seem more convenient than anything else.

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 20:22

laurini · 18/07/2026 20:16

Lol you have a low bar. Im a SAHM while my husband is at work, but in evenings and on weekends, we share everything.

I personally don't have a low bar at all and would never have gone into that relationship.

But if she agreed with him at the time that's what would happen, then there's no reason why he would or should agree to change that now.

And there are plenty of women who would agree to that relationship if it gave them a lifestyle that other women would drool over.

Unfortunately we are being given no details of the likely holidays, lovely house, posh car , etc that goes with that kind of income, only that she's fed up with him not doing any child care or housework.

I suspect in the absence of any other information that she has fallen out of love with him and that has completely changed the dynamic of that relationship.

fashionqueen0123 · 18/07/2026 20:24

Optionsneeded · 18/07/2026 13:05

He hasn’t ever used our vacuum, put something into our dishwasher, taken the bins out, bathed our children, cooked our children a meal, changed the sheets, attended a kids medical appointment, tidied up our children’s toys. Do you honestly think that is ok?

So when you say things like ‘can you stack the dishwasher, bins need putting out.’ What does he do? Surely you don’t just do it all without saying anything?!

littleorangefox · 18/07/2026 20:24

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 18:37

Four children under 6 is not a representative situation. Two children, one in school is perfectly feasible and it's what she signed up for when she started this relationship with a much older and very wealthy man.

Nope. She didn't "sign up" to be a 24/7 maid and solo parent.

In that situation the person who works outside the home should still be contributing an equal amount to the parenting and running the household (and by that I mean tasks not financially) as the person who stays at home. Even when all my children are in school, I will not be taking on 100% of the parenting and housework or mental load all of the time. Not a chance.

Cheeseandolivesplease · 18/07/2026 20:27

@littleorangefox But yet you expect him to do 100% of going out and earning money?

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 20:32

littleorangefox · 18/07/2026 20:24

Nope. She didn't "sign up" to be a 24/7 maid and solo parent.

In that situation the person who works outside the home should still be contributing an equal amount to the parenting and running the household (and by that I mean tasks not financially) as the person who stays at home. Even when all my children are in school, I will not be taking on 100% of the parenting and housework or mental load all of the time. Not a chance.

But that isn't what she agreed to and the first child is school age before she decides she wants to change it. Something else has gone wrong in this relationship and my bet is that she no longer loves him.

There are lots and lots of relationships with very rich men that run on exactly the same basis. It suits some women, the OP is no longer one of them.

muggart · 18/07/2026 20:37

Diamond7272 · 18/07/2026 19:54

She's never had a commute.

Never had a boss.

Never faced redundancy, restructuring, disciplining at work.

Jesus....

She's hardly being abused!!!!! Sheltered more like.

When did women trot out this word 'abuse' in the context of choices so often??????

She saw his life at 20years old, went "ill have a bit of that!" and the rest is history.... 5 years history, so in the scheme of things not much history or 'abuse'...

For women genuinely being abused, beaten, frightened, this thread is laughable...

none of that is remotely comparable to raising small children which is a 24/7 job with no break. well most people do get a break because they have spouses, obviously, but not in this case.

having a job, a commute, a boss is NORMAL i can’t see why you’re making such a fuss about it. the husband also gets tea breaks, alone time, sick days, adult conversations, uninterrupted nights sleep.

your attitude is so bizarre honestly

Imdunfer · 18/07/2026 20:37

I wonder how many of the posters on this forum think how women with a partner away in the armed forces or working x weeks on x weeks off on ships or oil rigs, etc. cope with being totally responsible for the home? What about single parents scraping by on benefits?

What exactly is so uniquely dreadful about this situation when it probably comes with some very nice extras?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.