Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

[Jellysweets13]

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

This child will have serious issues if they ever find or become aware of these films

I think most people here are worried about the potential baby, rather than trying to throw shade on BB particularly. Not knowing who your father is while also having grandparents who publicly pimp out their daughter, a mother who is as recklessly self-ebasing as to put you at risk in the womb for money and potentially give you long term health complications surely would be a concern to most people? Who is to know if she has something STD wise and they just don't want to pull her fame and fortune by announcing it?

Can you imagine being her midwife? I know they shouldn’t judge but…

Also, actually being her child when he/she grows up and finding out what your mum did. Does she even know who the father is? Surely it could be all manner of folk, who knows what genetic issues they may have.

She’s so grim. I remember when she came to uni’s to encourage freshers to sleep with her. As an academic I was grateful she dodged Manchester.

I would be very worried one of these weirdo men would find out where I live if I were her but that is a risk for all OnlyFans creators I imagine. There's been a few cases I've read of women being stalked and/or attacked by "fans".

I don’t think she is she’ll be in SS radar
unprotected sex with multiple partners ids a high risk sexual activity
std’s are a risk to the unborn baby hence putting it at risk
yet another attention grabbing hoax ( I hope and pray )

I agree with pp that she seems the type to monetise the baby too. I can't stand people putting their kids out on the public internet, those mummy bloggers and such are just as bad.

An unborn baby has no legal rights so at present SS have no remit

My major concern is that making the most recent video ‘baby shower’ themed is centering the baby. It’s rapidly moving away from her pregnant body and onto the baby.

At what point are the adults involved / consuming the content engaging in paedophilia?
I would’ve originally thought only once an actual child is involved, after all pregnant women have sex every day and it’s totally normal.

But my spidey senses are seriously screaming at how everything is being framed.

She needs psychiatric help.

SS do get involved with pregnant women.

It’s very common. They also can and do remove babies at birth if they are deemed to be at risk.

I’m not saying that that will happen in this case, it it’s incorrect to simply say that the unborn baby has no rights therefore SS have no remit.

Agree it’s walking a very fine line. She isn’t just having sex as a pregnant woman.

She has made a baby shower into a pornographic film.

Wikipedia informs me that she is married. I would imagine her husband is the main candidate for father of the baby, although if I were him I would be asking for a DNA test.

She is absolutely the most revolting creature and that baby should be removed at birth.

I don’t think she does at all. A personality order, I imagine- psychiatric help doesn’t help
with that.

TBH I think the SS conversation is a red flag. There is no doubt SS will be, and probably have already been, in contact with her and her baby when it’s born. The public will be making daily reports about her.

i bet she knows who the dad is. It’s someone she decided to have a baby with. She obviously uses contraception in her work

I didn't say they didn't remove at birth, I know they do, I have worked in maternity care myself.

You were asking people if it is her body her choice - yes it is

You said "Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved"

The line / action occurs for the baby when the baby actually has legal rights, after they are born.

I think that if you make a choice to continue with a pregnancy then you should make reasonable attempts to protect the fetus from harm.

You may have the legal right to do what you choose however I would question whether one is fit to parent if they cannot make reasonable attempts to protect the person they are choosing to bring into the world.

So women who have sex when pregnant all need reporting to social services? Why?

This - if she is pregnant and is planning to auction the name etc and have sex whilst pregnant with high numbers of men plus filmed or whatever I imagine the baby will be taken into care.

I saw a video of the drinking shots. FAS is horrific. She must be a sociopath, it is horrifying.

Are you being deliberately obtuse? 🙄

Do you not think that there is a difference between.

Pregnant women having sex

Pregnant woman hosting a baby shower during which she invites multiple strangers to urinate over her and then have sex filming it for public consumption.

If a relative of your was pregnant and inviting strangers over to a hotel to piss on her and have sex while pretending it was her baby shower.

Would you not be ever so slightly concerned about the baby and her ability to parent?

Objectively she has done nothing to harm the fetus. How and why you have sex has very little to do with being a good parent in a day to day basis.

I feel so sorry for the kid..

She also admitted there were significant failures with the use of condoms in her stunts with many slipping off, breaking or being sucked inside her and having to be manually removed (bleugh). The very first guy didn't even have one on.

Google delightfully tells me that "In February 2026, she hosted a "breeding mission" stunt with roughly 400 men where she intentionally did not use protection, later announcing a pregnancy"

The whole baby food element is also forgotten. It’s no different to putting that in a bottle and drinking it (let me not give her ideas), it’s not just about a pregnant woman having sex, now it’s fetishising the baby.