Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

[Jellysweets13]

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

But specifically at risk from this behaviour? Not, should we act preemptively so when the baby is born we protect it from mother’s inability to safeguard effectively.

Is this baby safe right now, with the mother’s behaviour? Is it already at risk from STIs or health issues its mother is deliberately exposing herself to? Or from the men she’s exposing herself to? I’d suggest she’s at general physical risk from her life style. Women who work in high risk environments often get moved to a less risky department. A friend had to leave her work with disruptive boys while she was pregnant, too high risk.

I wonder if they would do this. But having multiple sexual partners, sex working and exploring fetishes whilst pregnant, whilst distasteful, are not child abuse. Stis are a risk but can be managed with medication and testing, it's not the same as drug use (mentioned above) which is 100% guaranteed to affect the child.

I guess there are demonstrable concerns about whether she is able to put a child before her own needs and her boundaries between her life as a sex worker and her private life which would justify an assessment. It's not as clear cut as some people seem to think though, they don't remove babies at birth for this alone, porn stars and sex workers having children is nothing new, but I suppose being quite so public about it is what marks her out.

If she is pregnant, she should be done for child endangerment. I’m not sure if that is an option as the child isn’t born. She can’t be for real. Time will tell.

Have a look at MaddyLucyDann on Instagram. She did an excellent post about this.

Sex isn't inherently risky to a baby and she's less likely to catch an STI than a lot of women. If she posts the baby's image publicly that would be problematic - not sure it would meet the legal threshold of significant harm.

Is she having unprotected sex? And pee is unsanitary but doesn't transmit STIs!

But that’s the same with sleeping around while pregnant etc, social services have no authority on that.

The bizarre thing is that apparently her mother and father are involved in promoting her so called career. Deeply disturbing . Money really is the root of this particular evil .

Why don’t you direct your energies at the rampant pornography industry?

I haven’t voted on your poll because I think it’s both. It’s her body and her choice, but the consequences of her choices means that it’s appropriate for social services to be involved for the welfare of the baby (if she is genuinely pregnant).

i believe everyone lives their life the way they want but not for all to see. we do not all want to see what this disgustng female is up to

This. She's only interested in money and views.

It'll be stunt after stunt.

Thanks @Plump82

I’ve posted it as she makes very good arguments.

https://www.instagram.com/maddylucydann/reel/DZNeLJ1MTOZ/

I am sure by page 2 someone might mention that the baby can catch STDs and even become blind if infected with syphillis, chlamydia, herpes or ghonorrea, most of which are on the rise in UK.

Where have you seen anything reported about who the father is?

Men are so gross

I don’t really get how this is a safeguarding risk or anything else. The feutus doesn’t have any rights and isn’t exposed to either urine or penis in this process.

there are women in sex work who will unfortunately be doing similar on a daily basis. Generally I’d be more concerned about them being exploited than the feutus, if you asked me outside the context of BB

I’m not medically trained, but a quick google tells you that there are health risks involved in urinating on a pregnant woman.

I think the woman on Instagram makes very good arguments as to why the behaviour is risky and why if you make the choice to continue with a pregnancy you also have responsibilities to the person you are bringing into
the world.

But this in the context of BB.

I could talk about other children and safeguarding risks, but I am talking about a woman who has chosen to use her baby for a sexual stunt. She didn’t need to do it.

Just an aside, if she isn't sure who the baby's dad is, I bet those 1k men are shitting themselves! DNA, what a time to be alive...

BB’s parents are her pimps! Of course she’s going to monetise the baby.

I find Bonnie fascinating. I think she is a sociopath. The men who take part, well, they are scum.

She did a Podcast with Louise Perry (Maiden Mother Matriarch) which was interesting.

I don't know if SS should be involved at this stage or not. Yes, she is putting the baby at some risk, but women can do what they want with their bodies. Women smoke in pregnancy, eat high risk foods etc, drink alcohol.

I can see them needing to be involved when the baby is born though if she keeps going on like this.

Whilst desperately unappealing, BB’s sexual activities are little to do with SS. Anyone can catch STIs and I would imagine she is rather less at risk as testing brings early treatment and fewer consequences. I presume you don’t actually mean that you want all sex workers and porn actresses to have their babies removed? Or all pregnant women with multiple sexual partners to have their children removed? Would you like a point score so women can be graded on the degree of their depravity?

I find her case alarming and think it desperately unwise for her, for her children and for women full stop but she is correct-she is miles ahead of many much more vulnerable women who don’t get SS involvement (or even the support they might like).

I would rather focus my contempt on the men involved, on the media that exploits this and the witless idiots who position the removal of a baby as a thing of great simplicity.

There is plenty of historical evidence that witches were generally accused by other women - the handmaiden’s of the patriarchy trying to finish the job the men started.

Placing baby at risk of stds which can be deadly for them

But in the context of BB it’s still a fetus and doesn’t have any rights.

@MferMonsterSearchingForRedemption i saw a TikTok from a medic who watched her ch4 documentary and said the same. Cold dead shark eyes, can’t compare her to a normal person.

Not removed, but it’s a red flag that monitoring and assessment is required to check baby is safe