Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

[Jellysweets13]

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

Having sex with multiple men while pregnant and letting the men piss on you, isn’t actually proof that she wouldn’t take good care of the baby when it’s born. It’s nothing like taking drugs or drinking large amount of alcohol when pregnant (both of those substances impair judgment and likely result in some physical harm to the baby).

I can’t see on what basis SS would be involved with her pregnancy.

It could.

Any kind of extreme behaviour could affect how you parent.

...which they definitely will. Poor kid ..

See some people think it is more concerning to repeatedly do this publicly and put yourself and baby at risk of serious STDs and lifelong illness without being drunk or drugged up...

‘Risk of future emotional harm’ can be used to place a child on a child protection plan and in some cases is even enough for removal. I would say that her baby, if she really is pregnant is definitely at risk of this .

Exactly.

Most women would not put their baby at risk in this way.

I don't understand why she's still doing this shit. Apparently she's worth millions....???

I’ve got mixed feeling about this.

Obviously her choices are vile and feed into the worst instincts of men. It basically promotes the misogynist idea that women are just warm holes to fuck and abuse. But in a world of extremes and AI she’s making a living and promoting herself and would probably say that if she didn’t do it, someone else would. Good for her if she’s making plenty of bank with a view to a short career and long retirement.

My question would be for how she’ll feel about it all once she’s a mother. And if she’s the mother of a little baby girl? Will she feel differently about what the female body is for? Many of these extreme porn stars are left physically and emotionally damaged for the rest of their lives. It is so tragic to hear their stories later when they’ve lost their youthful looks and they are incontinent and bitter. The men get all the fun, and these naive young women think they’re doing something harmless but it takes its toll. How will that child feel then? Would it have been worth it?

My other reflection is that I work in education where I see and hear of plenty of families where women are pregnant (multiple times) in circumstances where they are living with the worst kind of abuse, addictions, chaos and violence. They are usually trapped and in poverty. And they condemn their children to that too. Bonnie Blue is just the tip of the iceberg about what some women do in a society where the power lies with men.

Whats the graphic content, theres nothing on there?

It’s beyond weird.

I can just about get my head around the fact that t that she just has no sexual limits and the love of the money. But to pit it over and above the health of the baby she claims she wants just makes me think she’s either mental or it’s all AI.

I do wonder whether she will disappear and change her identity because the child won’t be able to escape it otherwise.

If it was a regular working class woman doing a golden baby shower and eating semen mixed with baby food, who conceived her child in a 400-man orgy, this would absolutely be used for SS involvement.

My worry for the child in utero is how many men she's going to allow to shag her.

Guidance on sex in pregnancy is clearly based on the assumption of one partner and average amounts of sex across an elongated period of time, not a hundred odd men lined up for a hours of constant banging!

I'm sure she makes them use condoms but they break. If she's taking risks with STIs then so is her unborn child. Plus you can catch UTIs, parasitic infections and herpes etc from infected human urine.

WHY isn't her instinct to protect the baby kicking in?

I genuinely hope SS take that child at birth and there are VERY few situations I'd openly hope that. It is absolutely brutal to take a child from birth but the kid is not safe.

Better to grow up with an adopted family and to be oblivious to the hideousness of their birth Mother.

I know, I know, her body, her choice. It is my choice to feel she is disgusting, she’s part of the problem in society, hiring college kids to fuck her on camera, penis after penis. She is acting like a horny man with a vulva. 🫣

Just to be clear I think some of the stuff BB is planning to do/has done is utterly gross. But from a safeguarding perspective until the baby is born it is not a separate entity and has no rights. Social services can do a pre birth assessment but can’t stop her from doing anything, even distasteful stuff that might put her and the baby at risk of infection because whilst pregnant it is very much mothers body, mothers choice.

Pregnant women are allowed to have sex with multiple partners, even without condoms. Just because some people feel social services should be involved, doesn’t mean there’s actually any basis for them to be involved.

If you think turning a pregnancy into a publicity stunt and an opportunity for pornographic 'content' to make money are signs of a good mother to be then you are deluded and you need to have a good look at your morals.

This woman is vile.

If she is genuinely pregnant then she needs to grasp this is not just about her anymore and her pathetic need for attention. She needs to start thinking about how her behaviour will affect her child for years to come.

Yes they can. I am a child protection social worker and I'm pondering on what basis we would get involved. Sex for money while pregnant - no, unless it was inherently risky IE she was involved in street prostitution or being pimped in a brothel somewhere. Emotional harm? Yes, being the child of bonnie blue will absolutely cause emotional harm. Is that enough to initiate a social work plan? I am not sure. I think probably not. Even if her child was removed they would still be her child. That damage is done. If she's making porn away from the child whilst the child is being cared for by someone safe and appropriate - I don't think there is anything we could do about that.

I reckon we've all been taken for fools and it will eventually come out its all AI.
What really baffles me is that not one of the "participants " (sad bastards) who attended the orgies, not one of them have sold their story. I completely realise they're probably not proud, but money talks.

That woman clearly has some kind of disordered way of thinking. She is an adult and unfortunately can do as she wishes but there is no way she should be allowed keep her baby. She is a safeguarding nightmare.

Yes I know. But the act of having sex whilst pregnant isn't inherently risky to the baby. It's not like being a drug user.

You can still catch STIs when using condoms. Yes, the risk is less but it’s still possible, especially for herpes.

I caught chlamydia the very first time I had sex whilst using a condom and it didn’t split.

But why?! Why on earth WOULD you have sex with multiple partners whilst pregnant? It's the epitome of grim. 💀

Whilst I think what she is doing is abhorrent I am not sure what you are advocating for here.

Are you proposing that the fetus should be granted legal rights in order for state intervention as that I don’t agree with at all. She is free to do what she wants to her body. Once the baby is born, the state is free to intervene with the baby as it sees fit.

Nope as having sex doesn't mean she is a bad parent.

What is it about being sexually active that makes her a bad parent?

Does she not feed the child when it is born? Will the child go unwashed? Will it go without childcare? What is your concern and what evidence suggests she will:
neglect said child
abuse said child
harm said child
not meet their needs?

She revolting but I’m not sure policing who pregnant women have sex with is the answer. This isn’t the handmaids tale. What do you want to happen? Lock her up?