Bonnie blue risky sexual behaviour whilst pregnant

[Jellysweets13]

If you’re not interested in discussing this then feel free to scroll on by.

A lot of us will know who Bonnie Blue is. The porn star who slept with 1000 men and various other stunts. Loves to rage bait especially to women.

She’s now pregnant, probably around 4-6 months.

If she’s to be believed she’s still working and filming and her latest stunt was to hold a baby shower in which she invited strangers to urinate over her and then have sex with her.

Obviously this has created a lot of outrage and disgust and there are comments everywhere online saying that she is not only sexualising her baby but that social services should be involved.

I’m not completely convinced that she actually doing these things for real. She has an X page showing clips, but it could all be fake or AI.

But let’s say for a moment that she really is having sex with strangers and letting them urinate on her. Where is the line drawn between her body her choice and saying that she’s putting the baby at risk and social services should be involved?

I’m very much usually of the opinion of women having autonomy and choice, but it seems like very risky behaviour and the child is going to have to endure a lot of negative comments and attention because of the choices the mother is making. She doesn’t need to do these things whilst pregnant she is a millionaire.

Yabu - her body her choice
Yanbu - it’s a social services case

Yes, overt prostitution is inherently risky to the mother, in a way that porn performing isn't necessarily. But again, your hypothetical council estate mother being paid for sex, if the child was being cared for safely by an appropriate person, what do you think the risk is to the child? On what basis could social services intervene, legally?

If it was literally just doing a bit of porn within a ‘professional’ porn setting where things are controlled, or uploading videos with a partner? Fine.

But hundreds of men? This would be considered a MH issue for a normal woman. At the very least you’d expect a midwife/HV/SW to check everything’s alright with you?

Why? Sex isn't inherently risky when pregnant.

If that’s how you think then your standards must be in the bin.

Maybe when the baby is born she'll have an epiphany and drop the sex acts a d selling herself.

Ali Kingston? And some other guy went to the DailyMail too. Bet theres at least a few on Tik Tok

Guidance on sex in pregnancy is clearly based on the assumption of one partner and average amounts of sex across an elongated period of time, not a hundred odd men lined up for a hours of constant banging!

what guidance is this @JustSawJohnny ?!

Tbf one of the things I was mildly surprised to find out a couple of years ago is that she doesn’t seem to drink even when not pregnant so I doubt this is real

No idea if she’s actually pregnant because that woman couldn’t lie straight in bed, but if she is and is planning to carry her baby to term I imagine social services will be getting involved. My friend adopted a baby who was removed at 3 days old because as soon as she was born SS went to court to start proceedings to do so, due to birth mum’s risky behaviour (not related to parenting; she’d never abused her previous babies). A lot seemed to be down to her taste in awful men and how she was with them.

Monitoring and assessment can only happen with parental consent. Most people don't know this. Unless the threshold is met for legal proceedings, even a child protection plan is with consent. I highly doubt bonnie blue would be consenting to a social work plan.

Oh sorry, I hadn't heard. I stand corrected. I still think it's all fake though.

Why are people assuming she doesn't know who the father is? She said she had failed IVF previously. She probably has a partner and he's probably the father. Much more likely than a random co star!

What do you mean by on social services radar? What is the radar?

I judge ppl on how they care for their kids..

You are yet to tell me what evidence you have that she will abuse her child?

Can you elaborate on what type of abuse you think she will do to her child and what gives you that idea?

Haven't RTFT. Of course YANBU...if she was actually pregnant. I don't believe she is. I think it's all a hoax for engagement, which equals money.

If she was actually pregnant, Social Services would be all over her. Contracting STDs during pregnancy is a life-threatening risk for a baby. The common and usually-harmless herpes virus has a catastrophic effect on babies, for example.

No way is she pregnant.

A pre birth assessment must be completed with consent. The remit is to assess the situation with consent of the parents, and potentially take legal action at birth. That's not likely in this case. I can't see how threshold would be met

I’m not aware I’ve said that those things make her a good mother.

How do you know she doesn’t have the exact same involvement your regular working class woman does?

It's genuinely vile, from a human decency point of view. Does it harm the baby? No. The baby is safely cushioned away in the uterus.

She sounds psychologically disturbed. I would have thought this is mentally and physically dangerous for the unborn child as it is not giving consent and is therefore i would say being abused. I would definitely call this child abuse. I would imagine the baby whrn born should be removed.

She’s utterly vile, pregnant or not

If she is pregnant, poor baby indeed

SS might well be all over her. How would you know?

It might, it might not. It's not evidence that she will harm or neglect the baby.

As i said before, i think this probably constitutes child abuse..

Why though? I'm being devil's advocate and thinking it through professionally. What emotional harm, other than growing up the child of a famous porn actor will this baby experience as a result of its mother's sexual behaviour?