Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Who should go to work tomorrow?

266 replies

NotSureICanDoIt · Yesterday 20:02

Today was my first day at a new job - one I am very lucky to have. I probably wouldn’t find another one as good again. Not going in tomorrow will look very, very bad and potentially jeopardise my job.
DP is a GP and has a 30 patient clinic tomorrow.

DD3 is ill. Some sort of virus, fever, headache, sore throat, no appetite. There’s no way she’ll be well enough for nursery tomorrow.

DP thinks I should stay home with her and I think he should. Up until this point I’ve been a SAHM so things like this weren’t an issue. He has never ever had to cancel work before.

Who gets to go to work tomorrow?

OP posts:
worldshottestmom · Yesterday 21:30

Naunet · Yesterday 21:23

Not her husband.
She's already sacrificed 3 years of her career, but that's not enough if your partner (again, not husband) is a locum? Frankly he shouldn't have had a child if his job makes it so impossible to take time off when they're sick, it sounds completely irresponsible, and it is not down to OP to make all the sacrifice to enable his choices.

Exactly this. She just got a new job and he's clearly acting as if it is of no importance compared to him. what if she wants to leave him at some point? What if she just wants her own money? What if he suddenly passes away or leaves her? She'd find herself alone with a child and no job cos it was always her to take care of THEIR daughter and sacrifice her career and personal finances to do so. Having a child means 50/50 unless otherwise agreed.

B9b9b9 · Yesterday 21:31

@NotSureICanDoIt You wrote
“DP thinks I should stay home with her and I think he should. Up until this point I’ve been a SAHM so things like this weren’t an issue. He has never ever had to cancel work before.” … I do find it somewhat bizarre that both of you haven’t had this discussion before you went back to work and decided how you would both manage your child’s sickness!!! Reflecting my own household set up , I would say being self employed or a locum means worse consequences of taking time off then where someone is employed …but you both need to work out whose career/ earnings take priority, it’s not often that both parents have equitable access to carers leave without compromising income or career prospects . One parent often needs to take the hit.

dreamingofgoodhair · Yesterday 21:32

Jolty · Yesterday 21:04

@NotSureICanDoIt
Since you've told us your husband's job, you need to tell us yours, for balance.
So what's your job?
It matters because it will influence the answer.

She has , she’s a copy writer. It’s irrelevant if she misses her second day they could just let her go.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

worldshottestmom · Yesterday 21:32

Franjipanl8r · Yesterday 20:44

Do you honestly not have a single person in your support network who could help?

God I wish I had the life that enabled me to think like this. No shade you are so lucky

Mumofyellows · Yesterday 21:32

You! For sure. How can’t he see that?

MassiveOvaryaction · Yesterday 21:32

In a similar situation donkeys years ago I had to miss my very first day in a new job (dh wasn't in the country so I guess a bit different to you). My career didn't suffer.

I think more people are relying on your dh than they are on you so I'd take the hit and take the day with your daughter.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 21:33

Naunet · Yesterday 21:23

Not her husband.
She's already sacrificed 3 years of her career, but that's not enough if your partner (again, not husband) is a locum? Frankly he shouldn't have had a child if his job makes it so impossible to take time off when they're sick, it sounds completely irresponsible, and it is not down to OP to make all the sacrifice to enable his choices.

Partner and father of her child then, it makes no difference to what we are talking about.

Do you give a shit about 30 people who almost certainly won't get to see a doctor who they feel they need to see tomorrow if he doesn't turn up for work?

His future contracts depend on being reliable on turning up for his current contract. He has been financing the family until now and I doubt they can manage without his salary.

They have jointly been stupid not planning for this and even worse their future plan is that she will "work" from home while looking after a sick child.

He should go to work tomorrow.

Mamabear487 · Yesterday 21:34

Absolutely you should. That will look soooooo bad if you don’t go in and they will probably use it against you as your drill in your probation period. Your husband needs to get his priorities right and parent his sick child.

Musicaltheatremum · Yesterday 21:35

wanttokickoffbutcant · Yesterday 20:18

This - he can get a locum, you will not get a second chance and they will assume you are unreliable. Is there really no-one else who can help out? My DGD died two days after I returned to work after maternity leave - I got the side eye from my boss and I had been there ten years!

Chances of getting a locum for tomorrow are thin. Also he's the locum so he would need to contact the practice manager tomorrow morning. When my mum was dying I really struggled to get locums so I could go and see her. It was so difficult there were just no locums around. But the practice will have to manage. These things happen.

dreamingofgoodhair · Yesterday 21:35

Databreach · Yesterday 21:10

‘A local teen’? Sourced from where, exactly? With no plans tomorrow, and a complete stranger to your child? A sick child, at that?! What absolute bollocks.

You can bet that poster wouldn’t have left her kids with a random local teenager if she could even find one with 12 hours notice. Some of these suggestions are ludicrous.

Genevieva · Yesterday 21:37

Can he do telephone appointments?

MCF86 · Yesterday 21:37

HettyTagliatelli · Yesterday 20:48

Of course it’s his problem! He chose to be a doctor and along with that comes some responsibility.

he also chose to be a parent and husband.

Vinvertebrate · Yesterday 21:38

DH is a consultant and recently had to leave a clinic full of patients to collect vomiting DS, because I was in an important meeting. He'd had a 10 year run of no interruptions at work until then, so I did not feel guilty.

Your DH needs to take one for the team tomorrow. Calling on sick on day 2 of a new job would be mortifying and potentially reputation-damaging.

Agree with PP that you need a better plan than "I can be flexible in the future" because kids are rarely fucking well at this time of year ime!

redskyAtNigh · Yesterday 21:38

worldshottestmom · Yesterday 21:26

No employer will be impressed by this though tbh, and her daughter is generally ill and doubtful she needs 4 weeks in hospital. Was your friend a single parent? It irks me that this girl has 2 parents but the male is assuming it's the woman's automatic role to take time off from her brand new job to care for her.

He's been in his job presumably years, she started yesterday. Who is more likely to be penalised for taking a day off? I would say OP, surely.

Edited

I don't think people can assume that all employers would consider taking a day off to look after a sick child as a problem.
OP's already said they would be quite happy for her to work flexibly to accommodate a sick child at home when she's in a position to work without support. That doesn't sound like a draconian employer. I'm not saying it's the case for OP, but virtually no one on the thread has considered that taking day 2 of employment off might be other than an unmitigated disaster.

And who knows how long DD will be ill? And then it's not just a question of DH's absence being accepted or not, but how many days the family can survive without his wages.

(And in answer to your question, no my friend wasn't a single parent, and her husband also had the time off so they could cover being with a child in hospital and also looking after their other child).

Spaniels4Eva · Yesterday 21:38

Given you both have decent jobs OP I'd highly recommend looking for a nanny. There's no stress if children are unwell, and they're not getting the high exposure to viral infections like they would in nursery. That way, you can both go to work if your DC is unwell.

BitterTits · Yesterday 21:39

It doesn't matter that he's a GP. First and foremost he's a working parent.

Smallpoxy · Yesterday 21:39

You.
But you need a plan because this happen again and again.

Lotsofsnacks · Yesterday 21:39

NotSureICanDoIt · Yesterday 20:02

Today was my first day at a new job - one I am very lucky to have. I probably wouldn’t find another one as good again. Not going in tomorrow will look very, very bad and potentially jeopardise my job.
DP is a GP and has a 30 patient clinic tomorrow.

DD3 is ill. Some sort of virus, fever, headache, sore throat, no appetite. There’s no way she’ll be well enough for nursery tomorrow.

DP thinks I should stay home with her and I think he should. Up until this point I’ve been a SAHM so things like this weren’t an issue. He has never ever had to cancel work before.

Who gets to go to work tomorrow?

Your DH can say he might have what DD has, he really doesn’t want to give all his patients that

crowow · Yesterday 21:41

Databreach · Yesterday 21:29

Yeah, this reply aligns with your first post.

you have no idea what the child is ill with as, ironically, you are not a doctor. We have scarlet fever running rampant in our nursery, amongst other joys.

won’t even start on the rest of your post. Have a good eve, and if you have kids, long may they stay in good health

Oh please 😅

PepsiBook · Yesterday 21:43

He needs to stay home.
You will likely loose your job if you call in sick.

shuggles · Yesterday 21:44

Jesus Christ, only on this website do people prioritise one person's job above 30 sick people. "Me me me most important, me come first."

If OP's job gets rid of her for taking time off to look after a child, then that's not a job that she wants to have anyway.

LethargeMarg · Yesterday 21:46

ime it looks better saying you (or dh) are ill not that you’re off due to child being poorly. annoying that this is the case but that’s what i found.
as others have said have you thought about what to do the rest of the week incase your little one is poorly for a few days?

parietal · Yesterday 21:47

emergency childcare website should be able to sort you a nanny for the day. expensive but it would help.

WaitingforthatRain26 · Yesterday 21:48

Franjipanl8r · Yesterday 20:47

Yes it is hard to believe, sometimes I think people don’t have the guts to put themselves out there and ask for favours from others.

Maybe you live in a village? Or have lived in the same area for years? We live in London. No one knows anyone around here. People move in and out of the building all the time. We've been here 6 months and have new neighbours already. We are also not from here. Partner is from England but his parents are completely uninterested in their grandchildren. I'm an immigrant. Most of my colleagues at work have absolutely no one they could call on either. Everyone is from somewhere else.

At nursery, everyone drops off their babies and runs for the tube. No one is hanging around and chatting, no one. There is no opportunity to start a conversation. So you can't even make friends with other parents.

Followingthestars · Yesterday 21:48

You need another plan. It is your second day and you should go; but he is also a GP so I understand why he needs to go too.

How id this going to work with 3 children? And no additional childcare until you are able to work from home?