Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour isn't Working - Thread 37

830 replies

NoWordForFluffy · 14/07/2026 14:37

In Nuthatch's absence, I've been asked to start the new thread!

A chat thread for those of us who don't like this Labour government.

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Previous thread: www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5548208-labour-isnt-working-thread-36?page=1

Labour isn't Working - Thread 37
OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
Pacificwave · 16/07/2026 11:32

This thread is just more interesting. 🤷🏻‍♀️

They can’t resist.

redange · 16/07/2026 11:34

For the last time: The one thing I cant get my head around is how after 35 years of the Premier League. Thus, thousands of world class Foreign imported Players coaches and ideas, England's retention percentage of keeping the ball continues to go down tournament by tournament ! I am sure in the dark ages of Wimbledon hoofing the ball up to Fashanu.

Secondly during the times when a goalkeeper could score at Oldham and QPR with two bounces on the shit 'plastic' pitches enabling QPR and Oldham to be 2-up before the game had started . However, am I imaging even around the dire straights football was in that England teams had better ball retention then today !

Bullandbear · 16/07/2026 11:43

Well, that was a brief moment of excitement….

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Bullandbear · 16/07/2026 13:51

Burnham’s in-tray is filling up nicely.

The US government is looking to participate in Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the BBC, in a move that would further complicate the flagship defamation dispute.

The president is suing the British broadcaster over a documentary that spliced together parts of his speech to supporters on January 6. He is seeking $10bn in damages.

According to filings seen by the FT, the US government told the court in Florida “that it is considering participating in this litigation”.

EasternStandard · 16/07/2026 13:54

I think we had a visitor because there’s some nerves over Burnham. If he crashes out it’s over for Labour.

Middlerage · 16/07/2026 13:59

that’s clear isn’t it, and AB is already saying taxes may have to rise…I’m sure only in entirely fair and non working class ways of course.

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 14:05

Bullandbear · 16/07/2026 11:43

Well, that was a brief moment of excitement….

Which I missed. Bugger! 🤣

OP posts:
Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 14:08

Why was I deleted?

Someone’s getting all worked up!

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 16/07/2026 14:10

What’s been going on? Has Starmer been posting on the thread?

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 14:11

His fan club, as usual.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 16/07/2026 14:18

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 14:11

His fan club, as usual.

What have the Starmerettes been saying? I mean in subject outline, not to repeat what’s been deleted.

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 14:46

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 14:08

Why was I deleted?

Someone’s getting all worked up!

I'm guessing because you broke talk guidelines!

But I didn't see your post, so wouldn't know.

OP posts:
NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 14:48

Oh, did you quote a Starmer fan? If they broke TG and you quoted it, you'll also be wiped out!

OP posts:
RosieHosie · 16/07/2026 14:57

PM

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 15:31

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 16/07/2026 14:18

What have the Starmerettes been saying? I mean in subject outline, not to repeat what’s been deleted.

Edited

Something along the lines of talking too much about football and not showing appreciation to the new leader.

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 15:32

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 14:48

Oh, did you quote a Starmer fan? If they broke TG and you quoted it, you'll also be wiped out!

I did quote it.

But I also might have added something for fun!

SpaceRaccoon · 16/07/2026 15:35

So a guy who wasn't party leader during the general election campaign (or even an MP) is going to raise taxes, whereas the manifesto specifically said this wouldn't happen?
Right, right...

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 16:39

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 15:32

I did quote it.

But I also might have added something for fun!

Edited

🤣

Dr House Oops GIF
OP posts:
NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 16:40

SpaceRaccoon · 16/07/2026 15:35

So a guy who wasn't party leader during the general election campaign (or even an MP) is going to raise taxes, whereas the manifesto specifically said this wouldn't happen?
Right, right...

Only of 'working people'...we need to wait for the loophole exploitation to be announced!

OP posts:
Bullandbear · 16/07/2026 16:57

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 16/07/2026 15:31

Something along the lines of talking too much about football and not showing appreciation to the new leader.

Yes, how very dare you!

Incidentally, similar to the Bollard nickname for Starmer, may I suggest Blakey for Burnham? Perhaps, I am behind the curve on this….

strawberrybubblegum · 16/07/2026 18:18

WildClover · 16/07/2026 10:11

Upping it?! WTAF

If Labour end up increasing aid to Pakistan, that will be a complete disgrace.

This government claim to be willing to make difficult choices, yet somehow always end up making the choice they find waaay too easy: stealing yet more money from working British people to give to someone - anyone - else.

It's pretty simple. The UK should immediately stop issuing any visas to countries who refuse to take back their citizens. Work visas, family re-unification, student, tourist, asylum. All stop immediately.

If we can't trust a country to take back their citizens, why the fuck would we allow any more in?!?

Shabir Ahmed was given a visa to come to the UK, aged 10. He is no longer welcome.

Of course, we will (and do) take back any UK citizens no longer welcome in countries they have moved to.

Dual nationals from birth are different - they are British and can't be expelled. It's ridiculous that we don't distinguish between people who were UK citizens from birth and those who have acquired nationality. Most other countries do.

Dual nationals from birth who are expelled from a third country are a bit trickier to repatriate, but it's hardly the biggest conundrum. When you live equally in 2 countries, governments manage to agree quite easily between themselves which country is your tax jurisdiction through a series of rules - it's no harder than that.

Somehow the government always find it very easy when it's about taking money from us, but suddenly impossibly hard when it's about fulfilling their obligations to us, such as keeping UK citizens safe.

SapphireCasino · 16/07/2026 18:31

@strawberrybubblegum oh they are going to do it. It was the first thing I thought when I heard that they needed to leverage something in order to deport that guy.

I try not to go on about this particular issue too much on this thread because it sends me into a spiral of "why do they hate us so much?" but yeah, I would be quite sure that's happening. This particular government don't care about British born people.

does anyone have the actual details of why Heather Herbert has been arrested by the way? I thought what he said was absolutely revolting, but surely he can't be arrested for that.

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 18:51

does anyone have the actual details of why Heather Herbert has been arrested by the way? I thought what he said was absolutely revolting, but surely he can't be arrested for that.

Potentially it's to do with a specific Scottish hate crime law (musings elsewhere on MN). It'll be interesting to have it confirmed though!

OP posts:
SapphireCasino · 16/07/2026 19:24

@NoWordForFluffy thanks

wonder what that's about. I was thinking they might have found out something else but tbh I thought that about Lucy Connolly and obviously that was wrong.

NoWordForFluffy · 16/07/2026 19:26

SapphireCasino · 16/07/2026 19:24

@NoWordForFluffy thanks

wonder what that's about. I was thinking they might have found out something else but tbh I thought that about Lucy Connolly and obviously that was wrong.

It wouldn't surprise me if there was something else, TBH! But I wouldn't like to speculate.

Apparently the Scottish court is really strict about contempt, so I'll just leave it there!

OP posts: