Oh, this thread has some bullshit, it really does.
Some of the posters defending MC/ the M&H threads were some of the worst bullies of other posters.
It's such bull to say "ohhh but we just want to discuss the history of the monarchy". There are plenty of threads were you can discuss the monarchy within its historic and contemporary sociopolitical context. The M&H threads were just sheer, gleeful "let's have fun throwing shit at Meghan" hatefests. If you want to discuss the RF, why chose a thread that regularly gets sidetracked into ten pages of 'Why Meghan's Acting Career Was C-List At Best'? Where posters seem far more interested in round 836,374 of "Remember that time in 2013 when Meghan wore an inappropriately sexual crop top" than debating anything current? Where the majority of posters and certainly the overall atmosphere is ferociously pro-monarchy and where you get absolutely torn to shreds for voicing even the slightest negative opinion on William or Kate? There's an active thread right now about Prince William - perfect place for those wishing to discuss the role of the RF in 21stC Britain - yet funnily enough those claiming to want such a debate are either absent, or actively defending William.
One thing I find very interesting. A few weeks ago I had a post about my personal experiences working with Netflix deleted (a post that didn't even mention Meghan), and MNHQ later re-instated the post as it'd been deleted due to a malicious false report. Going from comments here and elsewhere it's clear to me that the agenda in getting that post removed was resentment at the idea of a woman of colour - ANY woman of colour - having a successful entertainment industry career, and wanting to remove any post where I talked with authority and insider knowledge about Netflix because those posts damage the credibility of the whole "Froggy's obviously lying about working in TV" thing they're so keen to push.
Anyway, I pointed out that in addition to MNHQ's email I also had screencaps of posts on MC where posters were openly discussing the best lies to tell to fool "gullible" MNHQ into deleting posts.
And several posters jumped on me claiming that MC DID NOT EVEN EXIST. That I was a liar, that MC was all purely an invention of my sick mind. They exploited the fact MN board software automatically blocks any post containing MC's name or URL by saying "post a link to this alleged MC site, if you can't it's proof you're lying and making it all up."
And oh look. Some of the same posters who were all over that thread are now here, freely discussing how they posted on MC.
The same MC that only a couple of weeks ago they were swearing blind didn't exist at all.