Guardian: weaponised emotional blackmail from 14yo 'trans' athlete

[teawamutu]

The Guardian's rearguard action on reality continues. Apparently the problem is not the parents and authorities who conspired to lie to this boy, coddle his delusions, disadvantage all girls around him in the service of his own wishful thinking etc etc etc: it's definitely the people who pointed it out:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/17/trans-athlete-no-one-should-face-vicious-attacks

I am prepared to feel a little sorry for the kid, who couldn't have been exposed like this if the useful idiots around him had done their fucking jobs. But the Grauniad can fuck off with the tired 'beee kiiiind' shit as a solution. Been there, binned the t-shirt. We want our shit back.

Of course no 14 year old should have to read negativity about themselves in a newspaper. But then again, no 14 should be used by adults , which is what is clearly happening to this child, to promote lies .

Humans can not change sex.

Sex is not the same as gender.

A 14 year old boy on the point of puberty has no reason to run in a race for girls. If he wants to run competitively he should be running against other boys.

I DO wish we lived in a world where demi-gerbils, trans-condas, pans-condas, non-binary gerbils, and everyone else all lived and loved in harmony. Why shouldn't the tiger enjoy sewing, just because she has big clumsy claws and everyone says that sewing isn't something that tigers should ever do? Why should she be defined by her stripes? She didn't ask for them. And why should the bunny be sweet all the time, just because he looks harmless? He might be hiding a criminal mastermind under all that fluff. Looks can be deceptive.

So, is Medusa a demi-girl or a demi-snake?
Also, the Minotaur: demi-boy or demi-bull?

Plus, why demi-girl/boy rather than demi-woman/man?

But how can we tell? If our reality is actually all in their minds, I'd really like to know how we can tell "genuine trans people" from "non-genuine trans people." It's important for me to be able to correctly identify what my actual reality is, or else how will I know if I'm living in reality or not?

I don't suppose we'll ever get a useful answer to this, but I live in hope.

In any event, it would be a lot more interesting than the usual "I'm still living in 2020" tripe that keeps being rolled out.

Demi cats

And if anacondas who identify as gerbils eat gerbils at the same rate as other anacondas should they still go in with the gerbils?

I want whatever they are smoking please. With a soft padded cell for sleepies.

Hi, Dumpy, glad you're back.

Re your previous post

DumpyVictoria · Today 21:36
Since they are criminals who are convicted of rape, they've forfeited their right to be believed that they are who they say they are.

I'd really appreciate an answer to my questions I posted upthread, thanks:

But if people are the sex they say they are, and that is 100% reality, how can you "forfeit" reality just because you've committed a crime? Either it is or it isn't reality. Reality cannot be changed just because someone thinks it should.

So, which is it? Has this person actually changed sex until they commit a crime, after which they miraculously revert back to being their original sex? Or is the reality that they never changed sex in the first place?

I dunno.

I may have had some wine.

I want a gerbil now.

These are EXCELLENT questions!

I will consult the demi-oracle.

Are you sure? That didn’t end so well for Richard Gere.

As I've said many times already, if the anaconda is really a gerbil, of course it wouldn't eat gerbils

Until it got really really hungry. Because it's biologically designed to eat gerbils.

It's nice to see Dumpy finally admit that they were spouting utter tripe.

Oh damn it, I forgot to ask about the demi-horse/demi-bird. Maybe the demi-oracle can answer that one too?

Is not my gibberish. It belongs to the interwebs.

Wow- transitioned at 4 years old! Poor child.

Dumpyvictoria is spouting stuff that has been heard before! On these boards, by all of us. Nothing new at all.
Sex isn't assigned at birth and cis is neither necessary nor helpful.

The absolute gall of someone telling the well-informed and educated women here a load of bull is something to see.

DV thinks convicted rapists shouldn't be locked up with female prisoners. So that's something.
or is DV having a laugh? (possibly) and been nominated by friends to "go on MN and wind 'em all up" ?

Peace, lovely fellow beings. Peace.

The problem is that, if you say we must believe the nice boy who says he’s a girl, @DumpyVictoria, we must also believe the convicted rapist who says he is a woman, or the predatory man who says he’s is a woman, or the intact male who says he is a woman and a lesbian, and that other lesbians are transphobes and bigots if they won’t let him have penetrative sex with them. They are different ends of the matter, but the trans rights activists use the nice trans ‘girl’ who just wants to play his sport to force us to accept the more extreme parts of their ideology. You will not be allowed to say that the trans women rapists are not real women, or that they should not be locked up with women.

This is the ideology you are espousing - I choose to accept none of it, and will not accept any male bodied persons in women’s or girls’ single SEX spaces.

Women need and deserve single SEX spaces, away from male bodied individuals.

We do live in that world.

It’s just the anacondas refused to stop being anacondas and ate all the gerbils. Because anacondas are going to anaconda.

And the men refused to stop raping women and insisted they were perfectly safe and most definitely not rapists and then they went and raped women in women’s spaces. Because men are going to men and we can’t tell the non-rapey kind from the rapey ones.

So we stop all of the men and the non-rapey men are fine with our boundaries.

If being defined by your genitals is sexist then how do you feel about people using outdated male and female stereotypes to define their sexuality?

So does that mean a transwoman becomes a man again when they commit a crime? Or were they always a man, just pretending to be trans? If the latter, please tell me how we can tell the difference.

I find it much more offensive to be defined by skirts, long hair and make up than by my uterus.

indeed

Oh, well, this is disappointing. I thought we were finally going to get a proper answer from someone who had facts to back up their assertions. I suppose I will just have to chalk this one up to "has no idea what they are talking about, maybe once just heard someone say something like this." Very poor effort on your part, I have to say.

I will also now have to assume that all of your other assertions of "facts" also have no basis in reality. I can't say I'm surprised, but it is most disappointing.

I may have had some wine.

I actually prefer this answer. Thanks for being honest about that at least.

Although, I don't believe you have actually had any wine, because in my head, my reality is telling me that you haven't. And, of course, that's the truth because I thought it. In my mind.

Wine’s working :)