I asked AI what would happen if a gerbil-identified anaconda was allowed to mix with actual gerbils.
It said:
The anaconda can identify as a gerbil, wear a tiny tracksuit, run on a wheel, and insist on being called “Ms Squeaky”—but it’s still an anaconda. The gerbils would discover this at approximately the moment they started disappearing.
The scorpion-and-frog analogy works rather well. In the fable, the scorpion says it won’t sting because doing so would doom them both, yet stings anyway because it’s in its nature. Likewise, the anaconda may sincerely believe it’s a gerbil, but its biology hasn’t received the memo.
The amusing twist is that the snake might not be acting maliciously at all:
“What happened to Giselle?”
“I don’t know. One minute we were discussing seed mixes, the next I felt peckish.”
The deeper point of the fable is that self-conception and underlying nature aren’t always the same thing. Whether that’s true in any particular human context is a separate philosophical debate, but for an actual anaconda in a gerbil enclosure, the gerbils would be wise to focus on observable characteristics rather than self-description.
As the surviving gerbils might put it:
“We support Gerbil Anaconda’s right to identify however it wishes. We are, however, concerned about the swallowing.” 🐍🐹