Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"Darlington Nurses" vs County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust Tribunal Thread 8

1000 replies

ThreeWordHarpy · 11/11/2025 11:44

Thread 1, 7-Oct to 23-Oct; pre-hearing discussion, KD (day 1 of evidence) and BH (day 2).
Thread 2, 23-Oct to 28-Oct; BH (day 2), CH, JP, MG (day 3&4), TH, SS, ST, LL (day 4), JS, AT (day 5)
Thread 3, 28-Oct to 29-Oct; AT (day 5&6), TA (day 6&7)
Thread 4, 29-Oct to 31-Oct; TA, AM (day 7) JB (day 8)
Thread 5, 31-Oct to 04-Nov; JB (day 8), SW, CG, JR (day 9)
Thread 6, 04-Nov to 05-Nov; RH (day 10), SW (day 11)
Thread 7, 05-Nov to 11-Nov; SW (day 11), closing submissions

Five nurses working at Darlington Memorial Hospital have filed a legal case suing their employer, an NHS trust, for sexual harassment and sex discrimination. The nurses object to sharing the women’s changing facilities with a male colleague, Rose, who identifies as female. The hearing started on October 20th, with evidence now complete. Submissions are being made on November 11th. To view the hearing online requests for access had to be made by October 17th. The hearing is being live tweeted by Tribunal Tweets who have background to this case on their substack. An alternative to X is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

The Judge made clear at the start of the public hearing on Day 1 that only TT or press have permission to tweet. If online observers see/hear something in the court that isn’t reported by TT, we don’t mention it until the next time there’s a break. This is a very cautious approach to avoid any accusations of “live reporting” on MN. Commentary on the content of TT tweets is fine as soon as they’re posted on X.

Key people:
C/Ns - Claimants, the Darlington nurses
R/T/Trust - Respondent, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
J/EJ – Judge/Employment Judge Seamus Sweeney
NF - Niazi Fetto KC, barrister for claimants
SC - Simon Cheetham, KC, barrister for respondents
RH - Rose Henderson, trans identifying nurse
CG – Clare Gregory, NHS ward manager
SW - Sue Williams, NHS Trust HR
KD – Karen Danson, first claimant to give evidence.
BH – Bethany Hutchison, claimant
AH – Alistair Hutchison, husband of Bethany
CH – Carly Hoy, claimant
JP – Jane Peveller, claimant
MG – Mary Anne (aka Annice) Grundy, claimant
TH – Tracy Hooper, claimant
SS – Siobhan Sinclair, witness for the claimants, retired from Trust
ST – Sharron Trevarrow, witness for the claimants, retired from Trust, former housekeeper and wellbeing officer
LL – Lisa Lockey, claimant
JP – Professor Jo Phoenix, expert witness
JS – Jane Shields, witness for the claimants
AT - Andrew Thacker, NHS trust Head of HR
TA – Tracy Atkinson, NHS trust HR.
AM – Andrew Moore, NHS Head of Workforce Experience
JB – Jillian Bailey, NHS Workforce Experience Manager
AT – Anna Telfer, NHS Deputy Director of Nursing
SW – Sandra Watson, Matron for General and Elective Surgery
JR – Jodie Robinson, manager of Rose

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
ProfessorRedshoeblueshoe · 16/01/2026 11:18

Fantastic

littlbrowndog · 16/01/2026 11:19

They won it 💃💃💃💃💃💃

ThatBlackCat · 16/01/2026 11:19

My hands are still shaking and I feel breathless! I cannot begin to imagine how those poor women felt waiting.

Orangemintcream · 16/01/2026 11:19

Fucking YES !!!

VeggieParishLunch · 16/01/2026 11:19

Slightly weepy here. Great news!

DrBlackbird · 16/01/2026 11:20

BBC update:

Rose's "very presence was seen as provocative".

Words fail me.

Cheetham said the nurses' treatment of Rose had been "unkind and unjustified", with their allegations about conduct "exaggerated".

Nothing. Absolutely nothing could be worse than a woman being unkind. It’s how to tell the biological kind from the feeling kind. No expectations for anyone who simply feels womanly to be kind. Strange paradox.

Babyboomtastic · 16/01/2026 11:21

Brilliant! Though I'm going to stay cautious until the BBC update in case there are some caveats which Christian Concern failed to mention.

Come on beeb...

fanOfBen · 16/01/2026 11:21

ThatBlackCat · 16/01/2026 11:18

This will be good news for the Peggie appeal, won't it? Does anyone think so?

Technically it has no effect - first tier tribunal decision is not binding on anyone but the parties to this case - but informally, yes, having at least one sensible judgement made can't hurt.

ArabellaScott · 16/01/2026 11:21

Oh my god.

Ramblingnamechanger · 16/01/2026 11:21

Well done to these determined brave and stunning women. Hopefully this will now be used to enforce single sex facilities throughout the NHS

DrBlackbird · 16/01/2026 11:22

BBC not reporting it yet

littlbrowndog · 16/01/2026 11:22

It was on 5 live

Datun · 16/01/2026 11:22

Thank fuck.

well done those bloody sterling women

littlbrowndog · 16/01/2026 11:22

As breaking news

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 16/01/2026 11:23

DrBlackbird · 16/01/2026 11:20

BBC update:

Rose's "very presence was seen as provocative".

Words fail me.

Cheetham said the nurses' treatment of Rose had been "unkind and unjustified", with their allegations about conduct "exaggerated".

Nothing. Absolutely nothing could be worse than a woman being unkind. It’s how to tell the biological kind from the feeling kind. No expectations for anyone who simply feels womanly to be kind. Strange paradox.

Sorry what?! Why are women meant to be kind to men violating their boundaries exactly?!

Meldrewreborn · 16/01/2026 11:23

Verdict has restored some belief in common sense over these matters.

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 16/01/2026 11:23

Come on beeb

I wonder if they are struggling to spin it?

ArabellaScott · 16/01/2026 11:24

'The Tribunal’s judgment concludes: “We were unclear what was meant by the submission that the policy was ‘lawful’ and deeper consideration of the argument led us to conclude that the policy of permitting biological males who identify as women to use a female changing room was not ‘lawful’.” The judgment then points out that the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 requires an employer to provide changing facilities which “include separate facilities for, or separate use of facilities by, men and women where necessary or reasons of propriety”.'

Datun · 16/01/2026 11:24

In their ruling, Employment Judge Sweeney and Tribunal members Denise Newey Malcolm Brain declared:
By requiring the Claimants to share a changing room with a biological male trans woman… the Respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to sex and gender reassignment which had the effect of violating the dignity of the Claimants and creating for the Claimants a hostile, humiliating and degrading environment.

“By not taking seriously and declining to address the Claimants’ concerns of August and September 2023 and of 04 April 2024, regarding that part of the Transition in the Workplace Policy that afforded biological males access to the female changing room, the Respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to sex and gender reassignment which had the effect of creating for the Claimants a hostile and intimidating environment.”

Chrstian concern website.

TheAutumnalCrow · 16/01/2026 11:25

I want to see the actual judgement tbh, not a press release from CC.

Did the EJ really rule that the policy to let a TiM into the women’s space was itself an act of harassment and discrimination? Because that’s big. Huge.

OH GOD I’M SO BEHIND

DrBlackbird · 16/01/2026 11:25

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 16/01/2026 11:23

Sorry what?! Why are women meant to be kind to men violating their boundaries exactly?!

No they’re not. I was quoting from the NHS Trust lawyer who claimed the nurses were being unkind. I was noting how only one side is meant to be kind.

ProfMummBRaaarrrTheEverLeaking · 16/01/2026 11:25

Our LGBTQ+++ desk need to calm down from their shaking and crying tantrum with some support animals and smelling salts, but once they've emerged bleary eyed and very very sad from their safe space room, we'll try and do some reporting.

*Plus, we need time to think about how on earth we're going to spin it

"Darlington Nurses" vs County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust Tribunal Thread 8
SexRealistic · 16/01/2026 11:26

Amazing! Well done Fetto and team.

But most of all - the Darlington wonder women!

teawamutu · 16/01/2026 11:26

Hang on, are the Grauniad going to have to report on this too? This could be hilarious.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread