Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Kelly v Leonardo Employment Tribunal 29th September 10am

1000 replies

ickky · 25/09/2025 16:30

Hello

Don't know much about this case other than Naomi Cunningham is representing Ms Kelly.

If you want to observe send an email to

[email protected]

Subject line

Ms BM Kelly v Leonardo UK Limited Employment Tribunal – hearing Case number: 8001497/2024

Ask for the link and pin to observe.

State you are a member of the public and give your full name and the email address you will use to access the tribunal.

Anyone interested?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
NotNatacha · 01/10/2025 13:05

It works with Google Chrome Version 140.0.7339.213 on my MacBook Pro running macOS Monterey 12.7.6

Thank you, @PrettyDamnCosmic .

MyrtleLion · 01/10/2025 13:06

From TT

MK - more would use if they knew
J - what % on site are women?
MK - about 20%
NC - any changes since Jan this year.
MK - Jan 25 sign went up to lock outer door. Last week, hard to explain. Have to go through outer door to get to cupboard and loos. The sign and lock are now on

Boiledbeetle · 01/10/2025 13:07

Breaking for lunch.

Back at 2.07

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 01/10/2025 13:07

Break for lunch until 14:07.

Boiledbeetle · 01/10/2025 13:07

Very precise from judge there on timings!

MyrtleLion · 01/10/2025 13:08

From TT

MK - inner door. The toilet badge has been moved, the poster has moved. I expected that to be done a year before
NC - does that satisfy you
MK - no.
NC - lunch?
J - more than half an hour?
NC - yes, content with 30-45 mins
ST - tight on time.
J - breaking lunch resuming at 14:07

Mmmnotsure · 01/10/2025 13:08

Women's Rights and Secret Toilets

We truly are back in the days of the Suffragettes.

GoldThumb · 01/10/2025 13:09

She is really fantastic. Extremely clear, and is getting straight to the point of all the issues

MyrtleLion · 01/10/2025 13:09

Cross posted.

OP posts:
FeralWoman · 01/10/2025 13:10

What’s the reasoning for locking the external door of the Secret Squirrel toilets? That’s a whole extra loo unavailable to women.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 01/10/2025 13:10

Boiledbeetle · 01/10/2025 13:07

Very precise from judge there on timings!

Let’s see if she sticks to it, or if she’s a bit more loosey goosey, like Big Sond!

CriticalCondition · 01/10/2025 13:12

How interesting that last week the Respondents moved around the locks, the poster and the signage on the secret toilets. Oh dear.

Boiledbeetle · 01/10/2025 13:12

FeralWoman · 01/10/2025 13:10

What’s the reasoning for locking the external door of the Secret Squirrel toilets? That’s a whole extra loo unavailable to women.

Presumably so her employer can say to the tribunal "look we gave her a fully enclosed lockable toilet and she still won't stop bloody whinging" as they roll their eyes and cock their head to one side.

Londonmummy66 · 01/10/2025 13:13

I'm just fuming that again a woman has to discuss periods and menstrual flooding etc just to ask that an employer complies with the law.

CriticalCondition · 01/10/2025 13:14

Do we know what the poster on the secret toilets said?

lnks · 01/10/2025 13:15

Just to clarify, the secret toilet which was previously female has been made into mix sex toilet, which means the company couldn't even allow women once single female only toilet?

Mmmnotsure · 01/10/2025 13:15

CriticalCondition · 01/10/2025 13:14

Do we know what the poster on the secret toilets said?

And what, if anything, Leonardo would have done/will do if a trans identifying male used/uses it.

lnks · 01/10/2025 13:16

Boiledbeetle · 01/10/2025 13:12

Presumably so her employer can say to the tribunal "look we gave her a fully enclosed lockable toilet and she still won't stop bloody whinging" as they roll their eyes and cock their head to one side.

Am I right in thinking though that the EHRC said that this still might not be adequate?

ICouldHaveCheckedFirst · 01/10/2025 13:24

Londonmummy66 · 01/10/2025 13:13

I'm just fuming that again a woman has to discuss periods and menstrual flooding etc just to ask that an employer complies with the law.

Too right.

CriticalCondition · 01/10/2025 13:24

I think, having looked through TT, that the poster was directing the user to lock the door. It was originally on the outer door that gave access to the toilets and the cleaners' cupboard (so the cleaners would be locked out while the toilet was in use) and then was moved to the inner door that gave access to two cubicles (thus creating a single occupancy space but halving the number of available toilets).

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 01/10/2025 13:25

Look at the hoops all the women have to jump through for these entitled men!
Made even more galling since they are breaking the bloody law.

AutumnyCrow · 01/10/2025 13:25

CriticalCondition · 01/10/2025 13:24

I think, having looked through TT, that the poster was directing the user to lock the door. It was originally on the outer door that gave access to the toilets and the cleaners' cupboard (so the cleaners would be locked out while the toilet was in use) and then was moved to the inner door that gave access to two cubicles (thus creating a single occupancy space but halving the number of available toilets).

That’s unsafe.

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 01/10/2025 13:30

AutumnyCrow · 01/10/2025 13:25

That’s unsafe.

So unsafe! What if someone had a medical crisis in the loo behind the locked door?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 01/10/2025 13:35

Londonmummy66 · 01/10/2025 13:13

I'm just fuming that again a woman has to discuss periods and menstrual flooding etc just to ask that an employer complies with the law.

💯

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread