Macrons to offer 'scientific' court evidence to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says

[SerendipityJane]

Quite unsettling it has to go this far.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg3llj5nxdo

TRAs will hate that there is a way to define legal sex.

This is why the BBC put apostrophes around the word scientific in that headline.

Exactly, I was just gonna say this - seems to be a US MAGA "thing" about women they don't deem 'feminine' enough.

It's absolutely batshit. Brigitte Macron is obviously a woman. It's really not difficult to tell

I don't disagree that the origins of her relationship with Macron are highly questionable. Separate issue entirely. It doesn't make this sensible or even rational. And I've no doubt they've only reported it on the BBC to try to link it to the trans thing ("this is what those nasty terfs who are all funded by MAGA want to do to you all - aren't they evil and batshit?")

The right to work is very, very different to blood test results etc? I resent being asked to prove that I am a wiman because I don’t look “womanly enough”.

That works both ways. The facts as they stand are that photos of the brother stop at the same time as photos of Brigitte start. How hard is it to produce a photo of Brigitte holding a baby? And the only photo she produced of her as an older child was proven by technology to be her daughter (who they claim she is the father of)

I heard a theory that Macron's wife is actually his biological father who came back to find him via school then developed an incestuous homosexual relationship...🙄

who the fuck are ‘they’?😂

The right to work is very, very different to blood test results etc? I resent being asked to prove that I am a wiman because I don’t look “womanly enough”.

No-one is being asked to have blood tests.

I didn’t believe any of it at first either but the more I read the more I’m convinced there’s definitely some sort of identity switch going on. But old rich families are weird and now we have AI technology and all sorts of advanced stuff trawling through archives it’s harder to hide those dubious histories!

So what proof do you accept as enough to prove that someone is a woman?

It's actually that now we have AI proof becomes redundant because almost anything can now be proved, whether it's true or not.

Book on Amazon, Becoming Brigitte by Xavier Poussard. He is a journalist who has spent years researching this.

I don't know what Macron is providing, but athletes are doing it via a cheek swab.

So you think it’s acceptable to demand such tests to prove someone is a woman?

I didn't actually know mich about them except that he was much younger, until just now.

Blimey.

In some circumstances absolutely, yes, to keep women safe and sport fair.

No one's demanding Macron proves anything, and I suspect the evidence she's prepared to provide won't prove anything anyway.

That thing with the daughter's photo is very odd....isn't it?

& who has even heard of …the ‘influencer’, (name already 4gotten after looking online).

…slight interest to see the Macrons have children but I’d never have looked& found out otherwise😺.

So what proof do you accept as enough to prove that someone is a woman?

Most people accept a simple cheek swab.

TRAs insist there is no way to prove if someone is a woman. If a man says he is then he is, that's it. Acceptance without exception (so that includes convicted rapists and paedophiles). No debate. That is their legal and scientific stance. Even Nicola Sturgeon supports this.

No, I don’t think so. I think families get busy, and that this is an insane conspiracy theory

How is this pressure by social media keeping women safe?

If you’re interested in learning more do a Google image search of Brigitte macrons family portrait. The little girl on the mother’s knee is meant to be Brigitte. The boy on the left of the photo (with the dimple) is her brother. Then compare to modern photos. I can usually figure out celebs from their baby photos but in this instance we’re not meant to believe our own eyes.

Historically athletes had to take their clothes off in front of a panel of doctors to prove it so I imagine most are happy enough to undergo a cheek swab to keep cheating men out of their sport.

No one is making Brigitte sue anyone or provide evidence. It’s all smoke and mirrors. Look over here.

I wish she'd not risen to this. Candice Owens is an absolute idiot. There have also been lots of rumours circulating that Michelle Obama is a man.
The best way to treat this is with contempt, it will just encourage them.

Has she not had two kids?

Then the macrons shouldn’t have asked Trump to warn Owens and they shouldn’t have sued. The other side claim they have evidence historical archives have been tampered with. People in power can’t just go changing history and we shouldn’t be okay with that.