Some further context
Venice Allan AT roseveniceallan
This young boy and his friends have been repeatedly calling me for months. I just had two more abusive calls this evening, so I thought I’d post this funny video of our exchange at the recent LGBA conference.
https://x.com/roseveniceallan/status/1728552616219586840
Wylde Magazine AT WyldeMag
That’s the revolting “Sophie” Brooks, who’s recently been emboldened by winning his court case that he was “attacked” at a LWS meeting. (Someone pushed his phone away). I wondered when he’d resurface.
9:22 AM · Nov 26, 2023
REPLY to this tweet on Thursday this week
Does Sarah Vine know about Sophie's previous mobile phone pushing court win?
Wylde Magazine AT WyldeMag
Yes, Glinner knows.
Another REPLY
When where?
Wylde Magazine AT WyldeMag
It was the LWS meeting at Speakers Corner in April ‘23. The court case in Oct ‘23. I testified as a witness. Thames Pilgrim was also called but didn’t have to testify on the day, but that started Tarquin’s campaign of hatred towards him that was mentioned in court yesterday.
Another REPLY
So was this a claim for damage to his phone and Sarah Philimore know about it?
Wylde Magazine AT WyldeMag
He kept changing the charge.. it was originally Transphobic Assault, but ended up as Criminal Damage.
Another REPLY
So his pristine phone was damaged?
Wylde Magazine AT WyldeMag
He brings 2 phones to each event he wants to make money from: the battered one from 2020 and the one he uses in case that gets actually broken. Why would anyone doubt the evidence of a baby-faced teenager that the battered one was his only phone?
Remember reasonable doubt - Glinner only has to create reasonable doubt that he didn't cause criminal damage.
If its his only phone and he's ALREADY had a successful claim for criminal damage on his only phone which is 4 years old...
This is why Sarah Vine was asking questions about this.
Nick Wallis twitter transcript:
SV points out SB's phone has a cover on in MM's video [missed what SB said in response]
SV goes to the Apple estimate for work which shows it was bought in 2020.
SB yes
SV you emailed the police in November and told them you were going to have your phone assessed for any damage
... Mr Linehan had caused.
SB yes
SV Apple Genius called the damage an impact point and a dent [SV takes him to his statement]
SV you describe a "deep dent" on the top left had side and on the bottom. - where's the deep dent - show us on the photos
SB they're poor quality
SV show us where the housing has come away
SB which part of the bundle J tab 3
SV is there a photo
SB Yes!
SV which number
SB 2 SV show us
SB holds up phone
SV whereabouts - where has the housing come away
SB partly
SV four year old phone
SB yes
SV pristine before that
SB yes - kept in a case with a screen protector
SV any photos
SB people don't usually take photos with their phones
We have an 18 year old, with documentation that they bought a phone in 2020.
The same 18 year old, has previously been successful in getting a conviction for criminal damage on his phone in 2023.
The phone he was using at BoI in 2024 was 'pristine'.
Hmm. Interesting.
Nick Will tweets:
SB I didn't follow him I approached him
SV and you put your phone in his face
SB I did not put my phone in his face
SV what did you think he was going to do
SB I don't know maybe walk off
SV by the third time you approached him did you not think he was angry at you SB no
Footage from Brooks's phone
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15066121/Moment-Father-Ted-creator-Graham-Linehan-damages-trans-womans-mobile-phone-harassing-series-X-posts-shown-court.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=social-twitter_mailonline
Quick Verifiable timeline for you.
Brooks buys phone 2020.
JKRowling and Suzanne Moore eat at Il Portico. Restuarant vandalised in June 2022. Apparently not in the public interest to persue.
Fake Reviews on Google including one from a Sophie Brooks. Restaurant response saying 'fake review' timestamped as over 2 years ago. Brooks's post is time stamped as 'edited over a year ago'. This hasn't been mentioned by the court, but fuck me it took me all of three seconds to find on Google and retrospectively this raises some questions about the police. (Of course it could be a fake, fake review but someone went to a lot of trouble in 2022/3 to set that up)
LWS Conference in April 23 where Brooks has an incident with someone and reports them to the police for criminal damage to phone.
Court Case in 23. Brooks wins.
Venice Allen posts above tweet in Nov 23.
Trans Kids Deserve Better Protest at the Dept for Ed - seems to be the start of their activity. Group is supposed to be for under 17 year olds. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_Kids_Deserve_Better Aug 24
Trans Kids Deserve Better Cricket Gate 12 Oct 24.
Battle of Ideas 19 Oct 24. Glinner reported to police for criminal damage to phone.
SB Admits under oath to harassing Thames Pilgram with a sock puppet account on twitter. Also admits to saying he wish KJK had acid in her face not soup. Says has had a long running dispute with Thames Pilgram (Seems like this dates back to TP reporting SB to the police). Comments about it being 'deserved'. Thinks cricketgate was 'funny'. Admits to sending out requests for support in court to the group. Is escourted from court by masked men (they don't look like under 17 year olds to me it has to be said) who act aggressively to journalists as the leave court.
No wonder Glinner is feeling rather hard done by at this point.