Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 05:58

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:46

Ok serious question what you have me do instead? What does you world with Trans people look like?

There are male people with transgender identities who exist in the world without accessing any provision that is designated as female single sex.

Some of us have told you this already.

It is your choice.

You either choose to respect women’s and girl’s needs and not access female single sex spaces. This may include using the male provisions or finding alternative solutions to your needs.

or.

You choose to not respect women’s and girl’s needs and instead ignore them and make every female single sex provision mixed sex because you have used it.

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:00

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 05:56

You need to QUOTE to reply. Otherwise no one knows who you are replying to.

A 'mate' is a standard greeting in the UK. Also in Australia and New Zealand.

It is indeed.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:01

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:42

Then indeed you know nothing about Norway or the rights of women there.

it seems when countries are successful with self ID you are unable to accept this and assume things which are wrong but fit your narrative.

Bless ❤️

No country is ever successful for women when men are allowed to self-ID and enter female only safe single sex spaces.

Having MALES in female only intimate spaces is NEVER successful for any woman or girl. It's common sense. We keep males and females separate for a reason. No male gets to self-ID into womens OPPRESSION.

BezMills · 29/08/2025 06:02

There shall always be at least one thread on FWR to tell the silly women off.

Oh OP, to have the confidence of a mediocre male, to walk into this place and give it Billy Big Balls Mansplains as if you're the first to try or even in the top hundred.

Thanks for your visit, hope you enjoyed it, probably won't see you next time

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:03

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:43

I am in my mid 30s . The 16 and babes are related to something else.

I do find in the U.K. since I have been here that almost all the Gender Critical women are much older second wave feminists.

Older and wiser women who have lived experience and wisdom. Maybe you should try listening to and respecting your elders who know far more than you ever will.

TheKeatingFive · 29/08/2025 06:04

How can countries that incarcerate men in women's prisons be 'successful for women'? The hatred of women from these posters is off the charts.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:05

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:46

Are you seriously saying one transwoman is reflective of all transwomen? Seriously? That’s like saying all black men are murderers or all women are like Rosemary West. That is a childlike view of the world.

I am certainly not a supporter of any individual who murders children whichever group they belong to

You're the one saying Trump and Musk are reflective of all Gender Criticals. You're a hypocrite!

TheKeatingFive · 29/08/2025 06:08

It is common for women not to fully understand how badly patriarchal socoety treats them until they get to a certain age. The period between my early 30s and mid 40s has opened my eyes.

OldCrone · 29/08/2025 06:09

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 01:35

If anything my take away from my interactions is here is simply I do know who I am and what I want. Despite the fact I want to be loved and accepted for who I am by everyone I know now more so that it’s down to me to find and forge that.

But that will be as me and I’m not a man whatever you all think.

You want to be loved and accepted for who you are by pretending to be something you are not?

Who you are is a man. If you want to be loved and accepted for who you are you first need to accept yourself for who you are and stop pretending to be a woman.

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:11

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:05

I’m going to say this.

I’d still rather be a heavily modified man who looks nothing like a man or less of a man. Than be a man. It’s so much of a relief to look in the mirror and see myself looking less like a man.m with time.

I said on your thread more than once that you need to get different mental health support. You need to find a therapist that helps you deal with your specific issues.

You have just shown us all that you really do understand that your issue is how much you hate being a man.

You have not once acknowledged though the harms that you, personally, are now creating through your demand that society treats you as being female by allowing you to access female single sex provisions. On your thread, you even told us and a rape survivor who asked you about accessing single sex rape crisis groups, that you would access a female single sex crisis group because you wanted to.

Please seek therapy for your self hatred (as per your own posts) and trauma related issues.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:15

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:00

Universal support? Nothing had universal support. Racists exist, homophobic people, misogynists, misandrists, anti trans etc.

The majority support self ID in Norway. Please educate yourself

On another thread you said and I quote:

"I’m reading these posts and it’s clear that women today think they can have it all.
the highest divorce rates amongst couples is lesbian couples. The lowest is gag couples. Women also initiate most divorces.
lets be clear - there is only one conclusion any logical person who is not a misandrist can draw from these figures.
women are more intolerant of things within relationships than men. That is clear. Every other explanation is just women trying to absolve blame from themselves.
I see many women today have a huge list of things they expect in a man but actually offer very little what the man wants in return.
The dating scene is so woman centric now that’s all we hear about is what ‘women want and need’.
men’s needs seem irrelevant. No wonder gay male marriages have the lowest divorce rates."

It's all about 'misandrists' and how men are kept down by women.

You show your own agenda. You feel sorry for the men folk and blame women for everything. You're as much a 'feminist' as Trump is the Pope.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:21

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:08

Just woken I know personally. But if you look at studies most woken are not TERFs. They just simply are not.

There is no such word as 'woken'.

Please speak in English.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:23

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:11

Battle?

That’s one study from Yougov which is a polling company funded by the right wing.
even in that poll most women say they agree that a person should be able to identify themselves as the gender they chose.

The fact you see this as a battle is sad and suggests your perspective is flawed on this subject

Get your facts right. YouGov is actually left wing - centre. Not right wing.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:26

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:12

Transwomen in these countries are women.

A male with a cock and balls is not any kind of woman, ever, no matter what country you are in.

And yes, this is the battle of the sexes. It's a battle for WOMENS RIGHTS.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/08/2025 06:26

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 15:12

As a woman and feminist I strongly disagree. The vast majority of women are not Gender Criticals. Gender Vriticals use feminism as a shield to justify their bigotry. If you think transwomen are the problem regarding women’s rights you are no different to Trump, Musk and the rest of the far right fools,

The vast majority of women have no idea that it is even controversial to say that men aren't women.

You aren't a feminist if you think "women" is a mixed sex category.

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:28

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

Because the material reality exists for everyone and always will.

It is you who is attempting to bend reality to suit your personal needs which seems to me to be to escape being a male person.

The material reality is this:

You are a male person.

Female single sex provisions exist for female people only.

You accessing any female single sex provision removes that provision from being single sex for female people. You are a male person so your access makes that provision now mixed sex.

There is no way to change the material reality of your sex class.

Not even through extreme body modifications, not even through postmodernist theory where you declare yourself to ‘be’ something and therefore ‘are’ that something.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/08/2025 06:28

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:12

Transwomen in these countries are women.

They're not women in any country, hon.

There are just countries where people are more willing to pretend they are women.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:31

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:16

The majority 51% of Norwegian people have a positive attitude towards trans people with 30% ambivalent and 19% negative.

Trans hate from Gender Criticals like yourself has led to an increase in violence and abuse administers people unfortunately.

you do realise you are responsible for this as a hate group?

https://outrightinternational.org/our-work/europe-and-central-asia/norway

You do realise you can have a positive attitude towards trans people ,WHILE STILL SUPPORTING FEMALE SINGLE SEX SPACES, right?

That does not address the question of self ID or female only spaces. It really says nothing at all about that.

Do a poll in Norway asking if female only single sex spaces should be for born female people, and unless human beings in Norway are a completely different species to every one else, I promise you, the answer will overwhelmingly be that female only spaces should be for born female people only.

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:33

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:32

I give you an article from a person who literally worked on the Equality Act saying it was supposed to trans inclusive and your response is simply ‘so what’.

So the point is we did have those rights till the ruling and that is how the act was intended to be. As literally stated by somebody who worked on the Equality Act.

Because there are other people who also worked on the same Equality Act who have said the same thing that the Supreme Court and the EHRC are saying.

This is one man’s opinion and you seem to be grasping onto this opinion to justify your choice to act in a way that is contrary to the law. And act in a way that is certainly contrary to female people’s needs.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/08/2025 06:34

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

Reality is not subjective. There is just reality and fantasy.

You are complaining that we won't accept your fantasy in preference to reality. Not our reality, actual reality.

As I explained to you on the other thread, there is no moral equivalence between asking someone not to lie and asking someone not to tell the truth.

The truth has an inherent value, which is why it is important to speak it even if it upsets some people.

Lies are generally destructive even if they make the speaker or the listener feel better about themselves.

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:42

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:35

Everything you say is about not feeling like a man. But why does that mean you are a woman? Not just a man who likes different things from the mainstream? You've never answered that. Not manly in a blokey way does not equal woman.

It becomes clearer and clearer.

For these male people this is the meaning of being a woman:

Woman = not being a man

After this week of reading male people’s posts on FWR, it clearer than it ever was.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/08/2025 06:44

Helleofabore · 29/08/2025 06:42

It becomes clearer and clearer.

For these male people this is the meaning of being a woman:

Woman = not being a man

After this week of reading male people’s posts on FWR, it clearer than it ever was.

As if they think the words "men" and "women" divide humans into "men" and "other".

But this is "feminism", apparently.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:53

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:38

You are obsessed with what is a woman,

Why is that more important than life itself?

your opinion of what a woman is differs to some others. I believe like millions of others that transwomen are women ( just like the majority of people in many western democracies do). You believe differently as do millions of others.

That’s fine

It's important because you can't DEFEND THE RIGHTS OF what you can't define.

Do you agree that it's important to define African Americans and to defend their rights based on them as a defined group? It's the same thing.

The overwhelming majority of the world believe in women having sex-based rights, even if misogynists like you who call women 'misandrists' don't.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/08/2025 06:53

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

In preference to infringing our rights, yes, if that's what it takes.

ThatBlackCat · 29/08/2025 06:57

Sammybabes16 · 28/08/2025 16:39

Yes but dime animals are capable of changing sex and the biggest driver of this is hormones.

The same can be applied to humans

Humans cannot change sex. It's biologically and anatomically impossible. Humans are not fish or animals.

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.