Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
murasaki · 28/08/2025 14:44

Someone's spent too long in their mum's basement.

myplace · 28/08/2025 14:44

But that isn’t true, is it? None of it.

I remember because I was here at the time, already forming my own opinions.

She made a statement about women. She was jumped on for wrong think, so she graciously apologised and went away to educate herself as instructed.

And fascinatingly, all she discovered agrees with her initial concern for the rights and welfare of women and girls.

So she kindly, courteously explained why she felt the need to hold the line for women and girls- and was jumped on again, declared persona non grata, witch, burn, smash silence at all costs.

At which point it became clear that there was no point trying to discuss and courteously explain, as the TWAW sheep had their fingers in their ears as they shouted about burning and raping and running down.

So she ran out of fucks and spoke her mind.

Huzzah. 🎉

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 28/08/2025 14:44

BeLemonNow · 28/08/2025 14:42

Where's my bingo card? Do I get one if I join this JKR cult no one's invited me to join yet?#sadtimes

I’ve got ‘white feminism’ on mine

<raises dabber expectantly >

myplace · 28/08/2025 14:47

Imnobody4 · 28/08/2025 14:43

You were warned it was a little too long for some people; perhaps the implication was a touch on the subtle side.
'Long' maybe 'subtle' don't make me laugh.

To be fair, he didn’t. I’m not laughing. Are you? Dozing off maybe. Gathering eyeballs off the floor when I accidentally over rolled them. Not laughing though. Not me.

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 28/08/2025 14:48

Oh god when do the kids go back to school??

just use the men's & stop making such a testerical fuss about everything!

Screamingabdabz · 28/08/2025 14:48

People can’t change sex I’m afraid. 🤷🏻‍♀️ nowt to do with JKR.

SprayWhiteDung · 28/08/2025 14:49

She did indeed share her opinion to begin with - an opinion that historically (and still now) virtually everybody would agree with, to the same extent as the 'opinion' that grass is green.

It was basically because the trans activists couldn't respect her having a different opinion from them, and plenty of them brutally set about her online - with threats, doxxing her and much more - which mobilised her into fighting so fiercely for the cause of women's safety and rights.

However much the activists want to simply tell women what to do and believe, and expect them to roll over and kowtow to their whims, they sometimes discover that they've seriously picked the wrong person to target and victimise.

Igneococcus · 28/08/2025 14:49

So much condescension in the first two lines already, blimey.

BeLemonNow · 28/08/2025 14:50

if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing

Is this a conclusion? If so I don't think anyone is blindly following around here. It isn't 'X'.

I've heard that suggestion a few times. OP have you read any TERF literature? I've read both sides.

Or are you blindly following one side of the debate and coming on here to lecture? Please state your credentials before continuing.

BackToLurk · 28/08/2025 14:51

Jeez. Just go in the gents

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 14:52

"For JKR specifically, it probably also helps that she can grift more social media attention and money out of being the figurehead for the movement."

Attempt at humour? Immersive performance art? What is this?

unwashedanddazed · 28/08/2025 14:52

Jkr didn't even get involved until about 5 years ago. I've been at this 10 years and there's many more been fighting it longer.

Just fuck off you know nothing arsewipe.

Namelessnelly · 28/08/2025 14:52

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

Do you feel better now?

Namelessnelly · 28/08/2025 14:53

unwashedanddazed · 28/08/2025 14:52

Jkr didn't even get involved until about 5 years ago. I've been at this 10 years and there's many more been fighting it longer.

Just fuck off you know nothing arsewipe.

What she said @CSIRCP

Igneococcus · 28/08/2025 14:53

I think we need a roll call of the posters who've been here before JKR got involved in this debate. I mean I was here since the legendary langcleg (albeit under a different name).

MyAmpleSheep · 28/08/2025 14:54

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:37

You were warned it was a little too long for some people; perhaps the implication was a touch on the subtle side.

But let's make it clearer for you.

What JKR has done is create a kind of "activism dopamine"; a hate activity which makes people feel like they're doing something without actually doing anything (or actually helping the thing they should be fighting against, in this case the patriarchy).

TERFism generally appeals to women who are enraged at the patriarchy but too comfortable with our current patriarchal society to try to make any changes by deconstructing the concept of gender, by portraying trans people as an acceptable lower class that they can punch down on and feel like they're doing something when actually they aren't. Talia Bhatt has some good writings on this in her book Trans/Rad/Fem.

For JKR specifically, it probably also helps that she can grift more social media attention and money out of being the figurehead for the movement.

But let's make it clearer for you.

Can't be bothered to read your screed, but if we're playing mansplaining bingo, I just crossed off another square.

Obviously this difficult topic needs someone like you (male) to explain things to the silly wims.

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 14:54

And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Obviously Rowling has made a huge contribution... but weren't we here first?

timesublimelysilencesthewhys · 28/08/2025 14:55

This post will likely be a little too long for most

A TRA being self indulgent? I'm shocked.

Namelessnelly · 28/08/2025 14:56

murasaki · 28/08/2025 14:44

Someone's spent too long in their mum's basement.

It’s cos it’s uni holidays innit.

SidewaysOtter · 28/08/2025 14:56

We haven't had a good scolding for a while, have we wims?

I think we'll all be glad when the schools go back Hmm

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/08/2025 14:57

Sure, whatever you say, OP.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/08/2025 14:57

Merrymouse · 28/08/2025 14:54

And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Obviously Rowling has made a huge contribution... but weren't we here first?

Yes. OP doesn’t know their audience.

timesublimelysilencesthewhys · 28/08/2025 14:57

What JKR has done is create a kind of "activism dopamine"; a hate activity which makes people feel like they're doing something without actually doing anything

Taking the SC ruling well, are you?

Duckyfondant · 28/08/2025 14:58

Well of course it's not a debate if you lecture people with no intention of listening in return

HashtagLurky · 28/08/2025 14:58

I have to refer to the classic reply:

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.