Oh, Pedro. The Supreme Court made the judgment, which was to clarify the existing Equality Act. No laws have been changed, no one has been oppressed. JKR supported For Women Scotland but she did not make any laws. She merely smoked a cigar in celebration of the confirmation of women’s sex-based rights. Pedro didn’t like that. He wants to protect the ‘dolls’ from ‘heinous loser’ women like JKR.
A heinous loser who survived domestic abuse and made a fortune writing bestselling books that got a whole generation reading; a heinous loser who helped women flee from Afghanistan, saving their lives; a heinous loser who funded a single-sex rape crisis centre in Scotland as no other such provision existed; a heinous loser who has tirelessly fought for women’s sex-based rights, understanding all too well how important these provisions are as a survivor of male violence herself.
What is a doll anyway? An inanimate object with blank staring eyes. Feminists raged against words like this being used to describe women. Do TW really want to be called dolls? If so, their misogyny is showing.
You can protect the dolls, Pedro, by making male spaces more safe and inclusive for gender nonconforming men. The dolls don’t need protecting from women, though. Even if those women might be heinous losers.