'Protect the Dolls' - doesn't that just say it all?

[Lottapianos]

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/apr/25/pedro-pascal-calls-jk-rowling-harry-potter-supreme-court-gender-ruling www.theguardian.com/film/2025/apr/25/pedro-pascal-calls-jk-rowling-harry-potter-supreme-court-gender-ruling]]]]

Pedro Pascal has called JK Rowling a 'heinous loser' - lovely. She can add that to 'bitch', 'fascist' and all the other offensive thoughtless nonsense that has been thrown at her

He was recently photographed wearing a t shirt that says 'Protect The Dolls'. Apparently 'dolls' is an 'affectionate' term for men who identify as trans within some parts of the LGBTQetc community

If ever we had any doubt that trans women were a sexualized fantasy version of what a woman actually is, doubt no more. How utterly grim

Agree with everything.

Thanks, I was going to write out his quotes but didn’t wish to offend anyone more sensitive. Andrea Long Chu is repellent, how he has won a Pulitzer for this says something about how far liberal America has gone, has fallen?

Why would we 'lose' either of them? Besides, Pedro Pascal, though a popular actor of a currently popular character, is still only one small cog in the vast (and unfortunately increasingly diluted and mediocre) behemoth of multimedia content that is Star Wars, whose contribution to this particular political debate seems to be to throw a couple of insults and wear a t-shirt. JKR on the other hand...

I wondered about this slogan too ... dolls are fake replicates of girls and women - often designed by men to not be true representations of females. Bit confused why that's an ideal transwomen think its great to be associated with - I would have thought its an insult for people who want to be seen as 'real' women?

@BabyOrca thanks that's an awful image but at the same time very revealing about what these people really feel about women. No wonder we don't want them in our spaces!!! It's beyond sick.

Oh that’s food for thought!

Exactly, very well put. I think they thought it looks good on a T-shirt, and that’s it. Many of these fashion types are like that, they rake around a little in the convenient history books or listen to some half baked ‘expert’ and run with it.

“Protect the dolls

actual women can fuck off”

we’re just not human to them

I was going to espouse the phase about uneducated actors and actresses but she went to Cambridge; she’s also a dyed in the wool communist and they are very much sex realist-types.

Just another one on the list to avoid, you can go off people very quickly.

These creatures disgust me at a visceral level and is nothing to do with their alleged 'trans' nature. It's the disgust I would feel for any creepy man parading kink in public. See also leather dogs getting 'petted' by small children in 'pride' parades.

There is no longer any pride in Pride to be honest. I literally don't know any gays or lesbians (friends or family members) living 'normal' lives who attend Pride now. It has become the preserve of fetishists, exhibitionists, handmaidens, beardy woke bros ('I'm your friendly local feminist nice guy - just don't check my laptop or chat logs!' ) and excitable teens cos-playing as 'queer' because straight is sooooo vanilla.

Thank you! This describes some family members who always try to guilt trip my husband and I into taking our children to Pride events when we say no, thanks.

‘handmaidens, beardy woke bros ('I'm your friendly local feminist nice guy - just don't check my laptop or chat logs!' ) and excitable teens cos-playing as 'queer' because straight is sooooo vanilla.’

This is them and their friends in a nutshell. They give me the creeps, not actual gay and lesbian people.

ProtectTheDolls is simply a more pornified misogynist version of BeKind isn’t it

There was no LGBTQ+ in the '70s and '80s.
I know 'cos I was there. Just the gays and lesbians back then. Not even the bi were much acknowledged then. And Transsexuals and transvestites were a separate thing. From gays and from each other.

Dolls is the perfect term for them. Dolls are not real, neither are women with cocks!

Anyone who believes a pornified version of a woman is not offensive is a sycophantic twat who really doesn’t understand the misogyny of this whole cult.

Gina Carano starred in The Mandolarian alongside Pedro Pascal, she was a cage-fighter previously.

She was sacked by Disney because she was an open Republican (and claimed to face discrimination), but she was previously heavily pressurised into putting pronouns on her social media profile and so she put "blip/bloop". Basically she didn't fit Hollywood.

I think Pascal was heavily involved, particularly around the pressure with the pronouns.

💥 💥 💥

In regards to Bella Ramsey, I believe that she is a lesbian, but again seems to be living under current societal pressures to self-describe as non-binary and use "theythem" pronouns instead.

It's strange that real lesbians feel pressurised not to use that term whilst men are desperate to use that term to describe themselves.

Oh wow, I don’t know of her but that’s a shame. I really dislike compelled speech.

Indeed. I mean, look at poor Ellen Page. I put whatever has happened to her fully on Hollywood’s homophobic/lesbophobic doormat.

It was a thought experiment. Like Desert Island Discs.

It would be great to see Snape vs a Jedi then teaming up with them against the Sith tbh.

(Elvis wasn't an original anything. Rip-off.)

Oh for fucks sake, she posted anti semitic bullshit online, she trivialized the Holocaust, it has nothing to do with 'being an open Republican' , Loads of actors are 'open Republican' and haven't been cancelled, Frasier 'Kelsey Grammer' has never been cancelled , Arnie 'I'll be back' has never been cancelled , same as Clint Eastwood whose always been a hard right Republican.

There's a line and Gina crossed it.

Sick fucking wankers each and every one of them.