Excellent!
This is the bit where I thought NHS Fife put their metaphorical head on the chopping block when - in response to SP’s ET Claims about allowing DU to access the female CR - they said they only allow it on a case by case basis.
I believe that these case by case checks are required by the EHRC…
But of course, it’s already in evidence that no one had checked DU before they used the female CR. And there was no policy on the website on how staff would even carry out the check.
So I’ve always assumed the judge would find in SP’s favour on this because the evidence (of absence of checking) was so clear.
… And for NHS Fife to flag it in their first response to SP’s claims seemed like an own goal to me - because if they’d not denied that charge by saying it was policy to do checks, then I’d never have noticed. It’s just like when I sat up and listened every time JR spoke because it flagged when something was going badly for her case)