The “women’s march” that’s all about the men.

[BackToLurk]

I couldn’t see a thread about this, but I’m just here to share how annoying it is to see a so-called women’s march so concerned with placating men. This is the march in January.

As well as the highly predictable “this is for all women” (meaning including the ones who are men) and the ‘we don’t tolerate transphobia’ (meaning any concept of sex-based oppression), the Facebook group is full of posts reassuring men that of course they’re welcome and it’s not all men and obviously “not my Nigel”. It’s infuriating. Why do people do this?

What do these people think of men like Debbie Hayton admitting it's all a fetish?

Is Sarah Jane “kill all terfs” in their group? I’d not feel safe at a march that person was in.

Struggle session ongoing, I see.

The "poor woman", thinks TWAW, and she's the Mum of girls.
No sign of Sarah Jane Baker that I can see.

This person....

Oh jeez I missed that.

I think that person doesn’t do anything alone. There will be a group of these dangerous TRAs there, being enabled by the organisers

Absolutely, and a whole load of women who know nothing about him, many of whom are taking their children.

I missed that SJB will be going. If that is "the" SJB, i definitely will not be going. I cannot afford to be in the vicinity of that fruitcake.

I’m upset. These organisers don’t know what they are dealing with. They have surely not been on the reviving end of aggressive behaviour if TRas.

There will be sex realist women going to London but the difficulty is in finding each other.

I have never seen such a thing in all my life. X has exploded with it and this thread has been wild.
It has went from wanting to hit TERFs, wanting their followers to believe men can get pregnant, inviting hate groups, blocking trauma victims, controlling what people read and protest for to now inviting men who have been in prison for kidnapping and torture and inviting those who use serial killers names.
I have never seen quite a circus.

Sarah Jane Baker is a dangerous man.

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20230717/281672554418126?srsltid=AfmBOopnv6EhEm9XkIbsZUcqISm37nK7TRHDqttY5HUL1891SJvDDLoe

Content warning. The victim whom SJB kidnapped and tortured gives his account.

More on SJB here.

the-lies-they-tell.org/2023/05/20/profile-of-trans-activist-sarah-jane-baker/

I think the phrase 'dangerously uninformed' is the most polite way I can describe women who cape for him.

Ah, I've put the wrong article. This is the one that details the kidnap, torture, beating that he subjected a 19 year old to. Again, content warning.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12299927/Man-tortured-trans-activist-brands-dangerous-violent-individual.html

They are now advocating for Sarah Baker to be there....

Whoever you are, Jen, you are a fucking hero.

Obviously he is a political prisoner 😂😂

I can't actually believe what I'm reading. They are platforming a dangerous torturer who sexually abused his victim also. They've said not all women will be squeaky clean 🤦🤣🤣🤣 These are a bunch of dangerous imbeciles and what frightens me is a lot are parents but they have zero safeguarding ability.

To everyone that asked for screenshots, I'm just going to start sorting them. The admin deleted her post in the Feminist FB group because I'm guessing she couldn't provide that scientific evidence she was asked for. But I screenshot it before.

Sorry im shell shocked... These women are so f'in brainwashed they are turning a blind eye to a sexual abuser. He is EVERYTHING they are marching AGAINST. God give me strength!

Are these actually women? Or are they TRAs posing as women?

SJB will be loving having women stand up for him.

For a group of women who are so about centering trans women I love how they ignored an actual Man who identifies as one when he said he was uncomfortable with SJB. They just ignored him 😭 pretended they didn't see it.

It's OK, SJB is a lovely lady...