Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another GC Employment Tribunal: Roz Adams vs Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre #4

1000 replies

nauticant · 23/01/2024 19:31

Roz Adams was employed by Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC) as a counsellor. She is claiming constructive dismissal for Gender Critical (GC) beliefs. The CEO of ERCC is a well known transwoman known for, among other things, controversial "reframe your trauma" remarks.

There's live tweeting from https://twitter.com/tribunaltweets or if Twitter doesn't show the tweets, look at https://nitter.net/tribunaltweets. There's an informative substack here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre

This post explains how to get access to watch the hearing: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4988632-another-gc-employment-tribunal-roz-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-2?page=24&reply=132419912

Abbreviations:
J: Employment Judge McFatridge
RA: Roz Adams, the claimant
NC: Naomi Cunningham, barrister for the claimant
ERCC or R: Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, the respondent
DH: David Hay KC, barrister for the respondent
KM or KT: Katy McTernan, ERCC Senior management
MR: Mairi Rosko, ERCC Board Member
MS: Miren Sagues, ERCC Board Member
KH: Katie Horburgh, ERCC Board Member
AB: ERCC staff member (name redacted)
NCi: Nico Ciubotariu, COO of ERCC
MW: Mridul Wadhwa, CEO of ERCC
BP: Beira's Place

RA gave evidence over 15-18 January 2024.

Witnesses:
Nicole Jones (NJ): 18 January 2024 (on behalf of RA)
Mairi Rosko (MR): 19 January 2024 (on behalf of ERCC)
Katy McTernan (referred to both as KT and KM): 22-23 January 2024 (on behalf of ERCC)
Miren Sagues (MS): 24 January 2024 (on behalf of ERCC)
Katie Horburgh (KH): 24 January 2024 (on behalf of ERCC)

Thread #1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4985570-another-gc-employment-tribunal-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crsis
Thread #2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4988632-another-gc-employment-tribunal-roz-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-2
Thread #3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4990903-another-gc-employment-tribunal-roz-adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-3

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Appalonia · 24/01/2024 14:34

I suddenly just feel really exhausted and upset that we are having to spend so much time and energy on defending our basic rights against this damaging nonesense. And these stupid women going along with it!

Boiledbeetle · 24/01/2024 14:34

I think I'm to annoyed at this point to be paying attention to what's actually being said right now!

In so angry with them.

ArabellaScott · 24/01/2024 14:34

Somanyquestionstoaskaboutthis Flowers* hope you're okay, and take care. This won't be easy listening for many women. *

Boiledbeetle · 24/01/2024 14:35

NC hysterical rage

😍

LarkLane · 24/01/2024 14:36

Appalonia · 24/01/2024 14:12

MW sees non white SU s

Non white is seen by many who are so described as quite an offensive descriptor. It assumes that being white is what every person yearns to be, and that having a different skin colour makes you a lesser person. Bit of an own goal there MW given how pure everyone has to be around the woo.

Mmmnotsure · 24/01/2024 14:36

MS problem is RA continuing to email AB to talk about her beliefs.

NC the subsequent emails are apologetic and careful. After AB asked to be removed from the chain, RA sends warm sincere humble approach to AB. You agree?

MS The first part of the email yes, but asking for conversation about it isn't necessary.

NC You are counting that as severe incident?

MS Yes cos AB felt hurt and humiliated

NC SU had every right to see if she was going to see someone m or f. This was a necessary question to ask.

MS SU was given an answer. We don't have men working at ercc

NC enquiry put with sensitivity and courtesy?

MS don't think so

NC ercc and AB replied with hysterical rage

MS no

NC that hysterical rage is how gi belief system replies to dissent.

MS no

nauticant · 24/01/2024 14:36

NC: Hyserical rage is a typical response by the gender identity belief system when it encounters dissent.

OP posts:
Boiledbeetle · 24/01/2024 14:36

ERCC seem to think the wrong people have the right to be angry and feel humiliated!

They can fuck right off

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/01/2024 14:37

NC is a real star.

Waitwhat23 · 24/01/2024 14:37

My husband is now wearing a resigned face as I repeatedly burst into the room where he's WFH to shout 'what the fuck! Listen to this latest bit!'

How anyone can justify gaslighting and withholding information from traumatised women, I just do not know.

And I can imagine it would be very difficult, if you were in a session with MH who had disclosed the information that MH is male, to stand up and say 'actually, that's not OK with me, I would like to speak to a female please.'

ickky · 24/01/2024 14:37

all those no's are very quiet

HarpQuartet · 24/01/2024 14:38

Witness saying "no" to every question from NC, but quieter and quieter...

lechiffre55 · 24/01/2024 14:38

This is very tough to listen to but try to see the good coming out of this process. These moreons are undergoing legal scrutiny, they are finding it very difficult as they rightly should, and their entire house of cards is being dismantled in front of us in a legal process on the record.
Right now NC is performing a very long direct attack on the gender belief system as a whole, not just ERCC. It's on the record in front of judges.

Boiledbeetle · 24/01/2024 14:38

Witness: it's about letting people have choice

Really?

Brefugee · 24/01/2024 14:38

Mmmnotsure · 24/01/2024 14:31

I think the muslim women bit is partly cos it's the team that MW is most likely to be involved with - minority service users

but surely also that for many Muslim women they are not allowed (or want) to be in a room alone with a non-relative male?

Appalonia · 24/01/2024 14:38

Misgendering can be seen as an attack

About letting pp be and have a choice

witness really struggling now

nauticant · 24/01/2024 14:38

Although these aren't really questions. They're statements to the panel and for them to watch how the witness cannot engage with them.

OP posts:
Mmmnotsure · 24/01/2024 14:39

NC everyone knows it's a lie, that humans can change sex.

NC It's why trans activists make misgendering an unforgivable sin.

MS don't know c unforgivable sin, but depending on intention can be seen as an attack

NC it states truth which is unacceptable.

MS it lets people have a choice

Hild0 · 24/01/2024 14:39

Fucking love NC. If I had a restaurant, which I don't, she could eat and drink there for free for the rest of her life.

Boiledbeetle · 24/01/2024 14:40

God witness is being dim

lechiffre55 · 24/01/2024 14:40

witness just said deliberate misgendering is an "unforgivable sin"

that she accepts the pharse unforgivable sin is appropraite is what NC is exposing

RedToothBrush · 24/01/2024 14:40

Note how the NB female responses with 'hysterical rage'. Not just rage. They are hysterical with rage.

Funny isn't it?

BlessedKali · 24/01/2024 14:40

why on earth did they send this woman as a witness?!

murasaki · 24/01/2024 14:40

Vaguely wonders if MW will sack MS for poor performance.....

nauticant · 24/01/2024 14:40

Scrolling through the attendees, it's really Tribunaltweets Assemble!

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread