Wouldn't it be good to point out to every publication, twitter poster and commentator that, according to the judgement,
*CGD were guilty of "oppressive and high-handed conduct in the public statements "
They "overstated judicial observations about the Claimant’s belief, and suggested that her belief could be equated to bigotry."
The discriminatory acts undertaken by CGD ... affected the Claimant’s status within the Respondents’ organisation and in the eyes of the wider professional world.”
The Tribunal criticised CGD’s conduct during the four-year court battle, finding that it had made inflammatory and inaccurate public statements .. which contributed to the abuse on social media, and the professional and personal shunning, experienced by Ms Forstater.
The employment tribunal stated that Judge Tayler had not in fact characterised Maya Forstater’s words as offensive or as causing harm to trans people.
In today’s judgment the Employment Tribunal made clear that:
“The EAT had not suggested that the Claimant had harassed or discriminated against anyone." *
I would like to see every publication who misrepresented the conclusion of the EAT taken to account over this.