Kayla Lemieux caught dressing as a man when not teaching!

[MeanCanadianLady]

I know on your part of the world you’re all still asleep but I couldn’t resist this story just got so much more interesting!!!

nypost.com/2023/02/17/kayla-lemieux-ditches-her-z-size-breasts-outside-the-classroom/

Hands up who's shocked that this is a perversion?

Shame on the head for exposing the children to this dangerous man

Honestly breasts that size are so impractical even if they aren’t heavy I feel like it would be frustrating going through everyday life like that. I’m not surprised he takes them off.

Every woman I know who had breasts larger than a DD wanted a reduction as they were lowering the quality of their lives, drawing unwanted attention and causing them severe back pain!

I’m not surprised he takes them off.

They aren't real. They are props which he deliberately and religiously puts them on to parade in front of the pupils.

"dressed as a man" = "sweatpants, trainers, a gray T-shirt and a navy puffer vest without breasts, makeup, glasses or wig."
I didn't realise that when I wear my trackies and gilet and fail to don my prosthetic giant breasts, makeup, and stringy blonde wig that I was going out as a man.
It's all so progressive I could weep.

Yeah I mean it's verging on the trans-abled.

If you don't go out in fetishistic, fake mammary props and don a wig you're a dude!

She's wearing pretty much the spring "uniform" at our school gates

Didn't realise were were all men

No wonder "let clothes be clothes" struggles to catch on.

I knew what you meant. I hope this gives all who sanctioned his behaviour in front of children wake the fuck up to themselves.

Ha! Mine made no sense either. Just desperate to agree with you, OP!

Glad we are on the same page. 🙂

Oh no, I wasn't having a go at you! Just pointing out the ridiculousness of the wording in the article.

Glad we cleared that up. Lol. I simply misunderstood. ☺️

Well colour me shocked! The question is now, has he just been doing this as a massive perversion, or was he trying to force the school board into firing him?

The impression I get is that it's the same motivation as men who flash. It's about using sexual aggression to deliberately shock. Flashers tend to target the young and the old, in order to increase shock and upset. And this person is choosing to do this in a school, to young adolescents. I don't think that's a coincidence.

It seems fairly obvious that the same standards of professional dress should be required of Transwomen as are required of women. I can't imagine a female teacher being supported in wearing Z size breast prosthetics or sexualised clothing. What are the school leadership thinking?? Why on earth does all ability to think and apply good judgement disappear as soon as it relates to anyone Trans.

Why was this ever allowed in school? He’s not even hiding under the trans umbrella?

I feel you are right.

‘“He put the whole outfit on and just walked up and down Guelph Line — no bags, just walking.’

This implies that whether sexual or otherwise he just enjoys getting reactions out of people. It’s really gross that he’s involving children though. It’s so creepy! He’s got to be a huge narcissist considering he didn’t stop or change what he was doing when the bomb threats started rolling in. What he has done to the kids and parents is indefensible. I don’t see how the school can rightfully continue to defend him now that this information is public.

However I know that canadian law has put the school in an impossible position too. They are essentially damned if they do and damned if they don’t. I think they are trying to avoid going to the human rights tribunal but I have a feeling they were doomed to be on that path no matter how things turned out.

Fucking men, this world gets more and more depressing

We don't know yet, I imagine one day we'll find out his motivation.

I think he's being awkward, trolling people. The initial walk up and down was getting his courage up, working out what the reaction was going to be.

I think he's doing it to annoy the authorities, wind up whatever school grievance he has, and generally point the finger at woke culture.

I don't think it's a fetish.
It's still abusive to those children, and a disgusting parody of women.

Are you deliberately missing the point?

You’re all women because you are biologically female. So whatever you wear at the school gate, you’ll always be women.

The let clothes be clothes concept is impossible in a genderist world because all the markers of ‘gender’ are stereotyped or outright offensive.

Why is it that this person chooses to wear the ridiculous fake breasts to work in a school but requires no breasts outside of it? Seems a curious choice.

Get what you meant, OP. Thanks for posting.

This man publicly dresses up in an overtly sexualised woman suit BUT only in front of children.

That sounds like something.....

hryllilegur

Why is it that this person chooses to wear the ridiculous fake breasts to work in a school but requires no breasts outside of it?

I can only imagine it's because he gets a thrill out of doing it in front of a captive audience of unhappy children. He doesn't wear his costume out of school, as it's tiring and he's not really deluded into thinking that he's an actual woman and probably gets shit if he does parade round like that.

This was my feeling on Dylan Mulveney and his Barbie Pouch, woodland giggles and Tampax adverts but I was wrong unfortunately.

Imagine a female teacher standing in front of a class of children wearing an ENORMOUS erect strap on penis.

He’s trolling. The school had called him out on toxic masculinity last year and now he dresses as a woman at work to highlight the ridiculousness of self id and gender fluidity.