Posie’s back!

[Whatthechicken]

love her, or hate her, we need her…and not a moment too soon.

twitter.com/theposieparker/status/1605663118402600961?s=21&t=PWXzDYgfqtMOfbm25dj7Mw

Well, I guess she's not an academic, but I bet she knows what a book is.

So now we're onto attacking KJK for being something she's never claimed to be?

Yes, Alf Up a Tree did a video explaining this: m.youtube.com/watch?v=1eUXHb8qM5U

She also boiled all her kids' pet rabbits, lunches regularly with Hitler, and despite claiming to be an atheist, agrees with the Pope that the sky is blue.

Wicked woman!

So, she didn't really know who sawn off runt Timmy Robertson was, when she first realised that some of their views were similar.

So that makes her a right wing religious extremist who sucks his cock.

OK. I see.

Did you ever wonder why people who want to believe TWAW, people like you and @wokebro , are NOT called all sorts of nasty names because your icons (you know, people who also want to believe TWAW) are convicted pedophiles, rapists, flashers, liars, frauds, etc etc?

Not my icons. You have the wrong end of the stick.

😁

Yes samphire, remember there are some posters who profess to be ‘feminists’ who will say they are not extremist activists, while their posts seem to replicate the dishonest and cognitive distortions that those activists use as tactics, to dismiss issues against violence against women.

Including resorting to effectively name calling in their efforts.

She didn't say that some of their views are similar.

She said he's an opportunist, and probably a racist yob, who capitalised on the void caused by the left's refusal to speak about the grooming gangs.

'If you can't talk about these things you leave them open for people with ill motives to talk about them and make it their cause, and that's exactly what happened.'

Yes, but my point is that some people are accusing her of being in bed with the little hate goblin, but they never answer how / why they say she is.

Yes I get that and sorry to be picky but it's important to point out she has never said she has similar views.

OK. Then why do people lie about it? Has she been on an interview panel with him, or something?

Why do people lie about KJK? That's the big question isn't it?

If you are seeking intellectual discourse, KJK is not going to be the person that you will go to.

This situation isn't a theoretical thought experiment, we just need plain speaking at this point.

LangClegsInSpace

Why do people lie about KJK? That's the big question isn't it?

Well, I know why in general, but it seems to be quite specific. I just wonder where it comes from, to have whatever it is twisted. Is it something like,

"Starmer was on Question Time with Farrage, therefore, Starmer is a right wing racist too!"

JHC so many people talking about KJK and actually her biggest strength is that she gets things done. She's all about actions, not pontificating from afar.

Thank you KJK for all you’re doing to protect women and girls if you are reading this thread!

Kind of. My understanding is that she holds events in public that are open for everyone and anyone to attend, therefore KJK is in league with anyone "far right" who attends.

Yes and cut through

Waffle is no help

Ah, thanks for that. I've watched quite a few of her videos and read some of her articles and just couldn't see where the accusation was coming from. And obviously, none of the people saying it give any real explanation.

There have been half a dozen threads trying to find out exactly why some people don't like her.

TRAs don't like her, obviously, because she's damned effective. But some intellectual feminists don't like her, either, because well, who the fuck knows.

However, her actual campaigning is spot-on and it's almost impossible to criticise, because all she does is give a platform to women. Any women.

So any criticism ignores the actual content of her activism, is often superficial and largely the result of a tortuous dot joining process, including disgruntlement over the colour of her hair, the size of her house, and the condemnation of the politics of one of the employees of a security firm she hired.

When you're trying to discredit somebody, because of the opinion of a security firm employee, that you've had to hire, because people criticising you are putting you in danger, you know it's not being done in good faith.

Too many 'yous' and not enough 'she's' in that comment, but you get the drift

Thanks for the explanation, Datun.

TRAs don't like her, obviously, because she's damned effective. But some intellectual feminists don't like her, either, because well, who the fuck knows.

I think it boils down to the same reason. She's more effective than they are and it rips their knitting.

Intellectual feminists? You mean ones who understand that promoting the right wing does not benefit girls and women?

antelopevalley · Today 14:05

Intellectual feminists? You mean ones who understand that promoting the right wing does not benefit girls and women?

Could you please provide us with some concrete examples of her promoting the right wing? Thanks in advance.