Posie’s back!

[Whatthechicken]

love her, or hate her, we need her…and not a moment too soon.

twitter.com/theposieparker/status/1605663118402600961?s=21&t=PWXzDYgfqtMOfbm25dj7Mw

There are loads of posters who are left politically but are GC on here.

It’s one of the things that many women along the political spectrum can agree on.

I know genderists like to do the far right thing but it’s baseless. A bit like gender versions of man and woman.

Absolutely, Marsha. Anyone fancy telling Julie Bindel or JK Rowling that they're far-right (or even just Tories)?

Yes, she just lets them reveal themselves for what they are and laughs at them

No no no no @Onnabugeisha

We know she is a woman with her won opinions. Some of which some of us agree with, some of which some of us disagree with.

Have you ever pondered why KJK is vilified for having SPOKEN to/about some issues and soanyone who says they agree with anything she says is equally vilified? In short: woman speaks, gets vilified.

Did you ever wonder why people who want to believe TWAW, people like you and @wokebro , are NOT called all sorts of nasty names because your icons (you know, people who also want to believe TWAW) are convicted pedophiles, rapists, flashers, liars, frauds, etc etc?

Could that be because we, women, GC women, feminists, MNers, aren't as desperate to discredit people like you using vacuous, illogical, slanderous, libellous claptrap?

Because very single time someone like you @Onnabugeisha or @wokebro post such gibberish all that happens is many of us reading have a little laugh at your expense, knowing you have fuck all left in the commonsense cupboard, are bereft of rational thought!

You really must try to do better.

Catching up...

Christ poise, you broke mumsnet.

Keep it up luv 👍

Have you ever pondered why KJK is vilified for having SPOKEN to/about some issues and soanyone who says they agree with anything she says is equally vilified? In short: woman speaks, gets vilified.

Did you ever wonder why people who want to believe TWAW, people like you and @wokebro , are NOT called all sorts of nasty names because your icons (you know, people who also want to believe TWAW) are convicted pedophiles, rapists, flashers, liars, frauds, etc etc?

Misogynists gonna misogyny.,

It's the same old story.

As said up to thread, they reveal themselves daily.

Misogynists gonna misogyny.

Indeed, Warrior. For now, as the great philosopher Taylor Swift advised, women will just have to "Shake it Off". But there will eventually be a reckoning for all this hateful shit.

@Glinner is back too!

twitter.com/Glinner

I was just coming on to share that. Fantastic news!

Yes here he is:

twitter.com/glinner/status/1606053380169744386?s=46&t=89NIxqU9_aoEwxTQCN44KA

Great news!

We owe Elon a beer!

Brilliant! Merry Christmas!

Not to derail, but I noticed some dude mansplaining to PP on her return to Twitter that "adult human female" is grammatically incorrect because "there’s a rule about graduating from smaller to larger scale categories which every dictionary will observe [and] 'Adult female human’ is the definition. ‘Adult human female’ is your brand."

This is actually a misunderstanding of the relevant grammatical principles, but never mind that. Let's follow through this mansplainer's argument, meaning that to be grammatically correct (in his mind), the last category ('female') should be the largest.

Which... it is. Are many adult human males actually unaware that there are inordinately more females than there are humans, and that female is the "larger scale category"? How do they think sexual reproduction works in non-human species? Over 99.9% of eukaryotes reproduce sexually. Large gamete = female.

What's going on with biology teaching that people don't know this?

Indeed! Has someone explained this to him?!

He's a mansplainer. Doubtful it would go in.

Came to also set glinners back! Hoorah!

It's all interesting timing....

I support her overall message on protecting women's space. but I find her to be a smug pseudo-intellectual with a massive ego. I can't bear to watch most of her stuff.

I hear she speaks quite kindly about you Overandunderit

I keep seeing that Posie Parker is associated with Timmy Robertson, here and in other places. What I've never seen is an explanation. Just an assertion. Has she been on telly with him, or something similar?

I've tried looking on Google, but just get ranting nut jobs, banging on about her.

Any ideas?

Hatchet job.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3489450-Jean-Hatchet-new-blog-post

January 2019! No wonder we're all bored shitless with this crap.

I find her to be a smug pseudo-intellectual
Posie? She makes no claims to be an intellectual.

Transcript of what she actually said about Timmy:

www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3489450-Jean-Hatchet-new-blog-post?page=5&reply=84427389

Thank god she is not an 'intellectual' or she would be sitting around writing lengthy wordy articles that such a tiny proportion of the population can and will read that they basically have zero affect on the outcome of anything.

Instead she's on the streets handing the mic out to women and giving them a voice.

I find her to be rather anti-intellectual. What makes you think she is attempting anything intellectual?

She appeals to many people’s raw emotions. She speaks words that many people wish they could say in public. She puts words to people’s thoughts that they are unable to pull together as they are in the beginning of processing their opinions.

If you are seeking intellectual discourse, KJK is not going to be the person that you will go to.

That is not to say that she hasn’t got that ability, I would say she does if she wanted to. I am saying that her strength is not to be positioning herself as an intellectual or even a pseudo intellectual.