I'm so confused.
You're supposed to be. There are a couple of posters who turn up to threads and over post endlessly, working to turn the whole thread into a personal conversation with them about anything at all other than the actual subject. Obsessing on a throwaway word endlessly is a favourite tactic. (Look up: Cowbag bitches. That was a good one.)
You'll notice in those posts there is no logic, no exchange of information, no discernible point of any kind, no aim other than to dominate the thread and a lot of protesting about how rotten and horrible MNetters are and how disgusting and pointless these conversations are (while continuing to post and post and post here, often investing hours and hours of their time into it, go figure), but the basic vague point is that women are big old meanies for saying no to men and deserve all they get.
The probable point is to try and bore and confuse people into giving up following the thread, and to fill it as fast as possible to hit 1000 posts. Quite interesting to note which kinds of threads attract this attention and then to consider the agenda behind it. ie: why is it so threatening that women are telling other women about this particular subject and who does it threaten? And also to consider why this tedious nonsense has to stand in place of any coherent information or lines of debate or argument. (Which you can find freely in almost every other post.)